From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1423317Ab3CVVY7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:24:59 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:50818 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1423298Ab3CVVY5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:24:57 -0400
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/34] arm: Use generic idle loop
References: <20130321214930.752934102@linutronix.de>
	<20130321215233.826238797@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:24:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20130321215233.826238797@linutronix.de> (Thomas Gleixner's
	message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:53:02 -0000")
Message-ID: <87zjxv9lga.fsf@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Thomas,

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:

> Use the generic idle loop and replace enable/disable_hlt with the
> respective core functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>

I gave patches 1-5 + this a quick spin on ARM (specifially some OMAP3 and
OMAP4 platforms, with and without CPUidle enabled.)

The OMAP stuff needed a couple minor compile fixes (below), but
otherwise it passes the quick "seems to work" test.

So at least for ARM/OMAP:

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>

Kevin


diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
index 23c653a..db37f49 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 #include <asm/fncpy.h>
 #include <asm/system_misc.h>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
index 3a6c6b8..2f17f95 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/bootmem.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 #include <asm/system_misc.h>