All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: lrhorer@satx.rr.com
Cc: 'Linux RAID' <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Requesting replace mode for changing a disk
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 05:27:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zldhvg0v.fsf@frosties.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090513012112681.IEFQ19662@cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com> (Leslie Rhorer's message of "Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:14 -0500")

"Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@satx.rr.com> writes:

>> This is one of many things proposed occasionally here, no real
>> objection, sometimes loud support, but no one actually *does* the code.
>
> 	At the risk of being a metoo, I would really love this feature.
>
>> You have described the problem exactly, and the solution is still to do
>> it manually. But you don't need to fail the drive long term, if you can
>> stop the array for a few moments. You stop the array, remove the suspect
>> drive,
>
> Um, how, exactly?  That is to say, after stopping the array, how does one
> remove the drive?  From the next step in your suggestion, it doesn't seem
> tome you are talking about physically removing the drive, so how does one
> remove a drive from a stopped array for this purpose?  I didn't think that
> either
>
> 	mdadm -r <drive> <array>
> or
>
> 	mdadm -f <drive> <array>
>
> could be used on a stopped array.  Am I mistaken?
>
>> create a raid1 of the suspect drive marked write-mostly and the
>> new spare,
>
> But doesn't creating the array with the drive wipe the contents?  If so, it
> doesn't seem to me this provides much redundancy.
>
>> then add the raid1 in place of the suspect drive.
>
> Before starting the array?  If so, how?  Or should one do an assemble
> including the newly minted RAID1?  I thought mdadm would take the newly
> added drive to be blank, even if it isn't.
>
>> For any
>> chunks present on the new drive the reads will go there, reducing
>
> Huh?  Are you saying any read which finds one chunk missing will
> automatically write back the missing data (doing a spot rebuild), or
> something else?
>
>> access, while data is copied from the old to the new in resync, and
>
> See my query above.  It seems to me you are saying the RAID1 can be created
> without wiping the drive.
>
>> writes still go to the old suspect drive so if the new drive fails you
>> are no worse off.
>
> I think I would expect the old drive to be more likely to fail than the new.
>
>> When the raid1 is clean you stop the main array and
>> back the suspect drive out.
>
> OK, basically the same question.  How does one disassemble the RAID1 array
> without wiping the data on the new drive?

I think he ment this:

mdadm --stop /dev/md0
mdadm --build /dev/md9 --chunk=64k --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/suspect /dev/new
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/md9 /dev/other ...

MfG
        Goswin

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-13  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-08 22:15 Requesting replace mode for changing a disk Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-09 11:41 ` John Robinson
2009-05-09 23:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-10  1:22   ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-10  2:20   ` Guy Watkins
2009-05-10  7:02     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-10 14:33     ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-10 15:55       ` Guy Watkins
2009-05-13  1:21   ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-05-13  3:27     ` Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2009-05-13  4:36       ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  7:37         ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-13 11:02           ` Neil Brown
2009-05-14 10:44         ` David Greaves
2009-05-14 12:00           ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  4:31     ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  4:37       ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-13  4:54         ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  5:07           ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-13  5:21             ` NeilBrown
2009-05-13  5:31               ` SandeepKsinha
2009-05-13 10:51                 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-13  7:28       ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-13  4:08 Sandeep K Sinha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zldhvg0v.fsf@frosties.localdomain \
    --to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrhorer@satx.rr.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.