From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7D51F453 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727327AbfD3WzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:55:23 -0400 Received: from bsmtp7.bon.at ([213.33.87.19]:6855 "EHLO bsmtp7.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726190AbfD3WzW (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:55:22 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp7.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44txgr1jx2z5tlD; Wed, 1 May 2019 00:55:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9485949BA; Wed, 1 May 2019 00:55:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mingw: optionally disable side-band-64k for transport To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Eric Sunshine , Thomas Braun via GitGitGadget , Git List , Junio C Hamano , Thomas Braun References: <31aa7bfcab834b753cc9f52fc9cc187f65e2d964.1556575475.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <890578de-6286-1726-37fc-d05bf4b359df@kdbg.org> Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 00:55:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 01.05.19 um 00:33 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> Am 30.04.19 um 01:17 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: >>> You're right, this is confusing, especially since Git for Windows 2.x does >>> not have that bug. >> >> If there is no bug, why do we need the patch? > > I thought you of all people (building with the ancient MSys/MINGW > toolchains) would benefit from it :-) > > But if even you don't want it, I'll gladly drop it from Git for Windows' > patches and be done with it. Ah, this is only for the ancient MinGW! I do indeed not mind if you drop it as I have updated my toolchain to the one you provide long ago. Thank you for being considerate! -- Hannes