From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753310AbcCVWxF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:53:05 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:54795 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752551AbcCVWxC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:53:02 -0400 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Inki Dae Cc: David Airlie , Mark Yao , Ajay Kumar , Javier Martinez Canillas , Doug Anderson , Jingoo Han , Yakir Yang , Andrzej Hajda , Joonyoung Shim , Seung-Woo Kim , Kyungmin Park , Thierry Reding , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-samsung-soc , Russell King , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Kurtz , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Kukjin Kim , Sean Paul , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Kumar Gala , Ajay kumar , Rob Herring , Andy Yan , Gustavo Padovan , Caesar Wang , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: Who is going to merge it [Was: Re: [PATCH v14 0/17] Add Analogix Core Display Port Driver] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:52:47 +0100 Message-ID: <8949624.HmxDpZAlt2@diego> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.14; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56F1CAEB.3080701@samsung.com> References: <1455534485-1154-1-git-send-email-ykk@rock-chips.com> <1919945.Y1tg0YzXlm@diego> <56F1CAEB.3080701@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae: > + Ajay kumar with Samsung email > > Hi, > > 2016년 03월 23일 07:12에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글: > > Hi, > > > > Am Dienstag, 22. März 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: > >> On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang > >>> > > > > wrote: > >> Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first time was > >> v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that has been out there for too long. > >> > >>> Tested-by: Douglas Anderson > >> > >> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > > > So we have 3 tests (Doug, Caesar and me) for the Rockchip side as well as > > Javier for the Exynos side based on the most recent drm state. > > > > As said by a lot of people it would be cool to get this merged soon - > > hopefully directly after -rc1. The only remaining question is through > > which > > tree it should go. > > > > I guess there are two basic options: > > - Inki takes the series - we could see the Rockchip-Ack being implied but > > maybe Mark can provide an explicit one > > - Mark takes the series with an Ack from Inki for the shared parts > > > > Inki, Mark do you have a preference? > > The problem would be that there is no drm bridge maintainer. I think the > most suitable person as the maintainer would be Ajay Kumar who is an author > of drm bridge framework. Of course, I could take them and have pull-request > again. But it seems a little late. Dave had already pull-request. I really meant that for 4.7, not for the current merge window. I just want to make sure it goes into a maintainer tree shortly after v4.6-rc1, before something else changes the exynos-dp again :-) . > To Ajay, > How about adding you as a drm bridge maintainer? DRM SoC driver maintainers > would need a person who can manage the drm bridge relevant pathes. The previous example (dw_hdmi generalization between imx and rockchip) did just go through the imx tree. So either the Samsung or Rockchip drm-trees might be enough? Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: Who is going to merge it [Was: Re: [PATCH v14 0/17] Add Analogix Core Display Port Driver] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:52:47 +0100 Message-ID: <8949624.HmxDpZAlt2@diego> References: <1455534485-1154-1-git-send-email-ykk@rock-chips.com> <1919945.Y1tg0YzXlm@diego> <56F1CAEB.3080701@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56F1CAEB.3080701@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Inki Dae Cc: David Airlie , Mark Yao , Ajay Kumar , Javier Martinez Canillas , Doug Anderson , Jingoo Han , Yakir Yang , Andrzej Hajda , Joonyoung Shim , Seung-Woo Kim , Kyungmin Park , Thierry Reding , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-samsung-soc , Russell King , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , emil.l.velikov@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 23. M=C3=A4rz 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae: > + Ajay kumar with Samsung email >=20 > Hi, >=20 > 2016=EB=85=84 03=EC=9B=94 23=EC=9D=BC 07:12=EC=97=90 Heiko St=C3=BCbn= er =EC=9D=B4(=EA=B0=80) =EC=93=B4 =EA=B8=80: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Am Dienstag, 22. M=C3=A4rz 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez C= anillas: > >> On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang > >>> > >=20 > > wrote: > >> Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first tim= e was > >> v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that has been out there for too = long. > >>=20 > >>> Tested-by: Douglas Anderson > >>=20 > >> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > >=20 > > So we have 3 tests (Doug, Caesar and me) for the Rockchip side as w= ell as > > Javier for the Exynos side based on the most recent drm state. > >=20 > > As said by a lot of people it would be cool to get this merged soon= - > > hopefully directly after -rc1. The only remaining question is throu= gh > > which > > tree it should go. > >=20 > > I guess there are two basic options: > > - Inki takes the series - we could see the Rockchip-Ack being impli= ed but > > maybe Mark can provide an explicit one > > - Mark takes the series with an Ack from Inki for the shared parts > >=20 > > Inki, Mark do you have a preference? >=20 > The problem would be that there is no drm bridge maintainer. I think = the > most suitable person as the maintainer would be Ajay Kumar who is an = author > of drm bridge framework. Of course, I could take them and have pull-r= equest > again. But it seems a little late. Dave had already pull-request. I really meant that for 4.7, not for the current merge window. I just w= ant to=20 make sure it goes into a maintainer tree shortly after v4.6-rc1, before= =20 something else changes the exynos-dp again :-) . > To Ajay, > How about adding you as a drm bridge maintainer? DRM SoC driver maint= ainers > would need a person who can manage the drm bridge relevant pathes. The previous example (dw_hdmi generalization between imx and rockchip) = did=20 just go through the imx tree. So either the Samsung or Rockchip drm-tre= es=20 might be enough? Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:52:47 +0100 Subject: Who is going to merge it [Was: Re: [PATCH v14 0/17] Add Analogix Core Display Port Driver] In-Reply-To: <56F1CAEB.3080701@samsung.com> References: <1455534485-1154-1-git-send-email-ykk@rock-chips.com> <1919945.Y1tg0YzXlm@diego> <56F1CAEB.3080701@samsung.com> Message-ID: <8949624.HmxDpZAlt2@diego> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Mittwoch, 23. M?rz 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae: > + Ajay kumar with Samsung email > > Hi, > > 2016? 03? 23? 07:12? Heiko St?bner ?(?) ? ?: > > Hi, > > > > Am Dienstag, 22. M?rz 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: > >> On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang > >>> > > > > wrote: > >> Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first time was > >> v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that has been out there for too long. > >> > >>> Tested-by: Douglas Anderson > >> > >> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > > > So we have 3 tests (Doug, Caesar and me) for the Rockchip side as well as > > Javier for the Exynos side based on the most recent drm state. > > > > As said by a lot of people it would be cool to get this merged soon - > > hopefully directly after -rc1. The only remaining question is through > > which > > tree it should go. > > > > I guess there are two basic options: > > - Inki takes the series - we could see the Rockchip-Ack being implied but > > maybe Mark can provide an explicit one > > - Mark takes the series with an Ack from Inki for the shared parts > > > > Inki, Mark do you have a preference? > > The problem would be that there is no drm bridge maintainer. I think the > most suitable person as the maintainer would be Ajay Kumar who is an author > of drm bridge framework. Of course, I could take them and have pull-request > again. But it seems a little late. Dave had already pull-request. I really meant that for 4.7, not for the current merge window. I just want to make sure it goes into a maintainer tree shortly after v4.6-rc1, before something else changes the exynos-dp again :-) . > To Ajay, > How about adding you as a drm bridge maintainer? DRM SoC driver maintainers > would need a person who can manage the drm bridge relevant pathes. The previous example (dw_hdmi generalization between imx and rockchip) did just go through the imx tree. So either the Samsung or Rockchip drm-trees might be enough? Heiko