From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33749C11F67 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2EE613CB for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233918AbhGAQAd (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:00:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:35373 "EHLO mail-pl1-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233585AbhGAQAb (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:00:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id b5so3909465plg.2; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y8RJ7NHLUH0UkXZQbqLTPlcYrodTSF7e3TMEWx7woGM=; b=hBSumFy8zhnstzAI41g+4dnLsD7YB10bmQ6//o5vOf9uKmAa5TIAFe0wA35h/ZVGK2 o569HGniyobCgsoHJPAVimX3544vYQSUk6WUjQmIdylortz51v1TI+RLzqttyE9bUNEY xdni7lv+pP6YqJ9ZM8Sm0loYXUhCjkvwx7g2qzZ+zBqsFFU7p08f2VAmZ0ioyJH1cwtQ S2+V0kxtfg8TFdtn3y+tJPcNvttqBk4VoUn3ETGwBFsQk+J004UFyg1zqCE7YePjIVKN 10I49Qb42I0zsaYzUFnoo4PnReyfiID/3vlkE9niBT5X3MkzsRCgSbQwRV44I/4xMqF/ 9PXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FbZsA/rTSKDa1uaPeArcStsXawlASQWMTyS0bA737jd1RJaRe ifjAlrAG7lS3ZRM4NkFGloM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVG+t6KRlrq32BvCj+MdsP5nTMwJW2oiZ8u2tKUXjf6dvTOkgsc5cIk2jTuqU8K/ihKx43kg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1944:: with SMTP id nk4mr420440pjb.66.1625155080441; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4000:d7:6a75:b07:a0d:8bd5? ([2601:647:4000:d7:6a75:b07:a0d:8bd5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t6sm9984750pjo.4.2021.07.01.08.57.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths To: Can Guo Cc: asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org, hongwus@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Stanley Chu , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Matthias Brugger , Bean Huo , Jaegeuk Kim , Adrian Hunter , Kiwoong Kim , Satya Tangirala , open list , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" References: <1621845419-14194-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org> <1621845419-14194-3-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org> <464097469b09752ce4ebb38c08f1a94a@codeaurora.org> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: <8971042b-e300-a1b4-7585-be9e0cf43030@acm.org> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 08:57:56 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <464097469b09752ce4ebb38c08f1a94a@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/28/21 10:41 PM, Can Guo wrote: > I am waiting for more infos/logs/dumps on Buganizor to look into it. > With above calltrace snippet, it is hard to figure out what is happening. > Besides, we've tested this series before go upstream and we didn't > see such problem. Hi Can, Jaegeuk has posted a fix as you may have noticed. Thanks, Bart. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79840C11F64 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BBE6141A for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:58:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 40BBE6141A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jjlkoJWyKgoG+yRo4iFoSLqyRe15bBCm9bUz33k5L5Y=; b=xy8j5ViQdyUVb74NqcvtTrevpD bBTr8Vwa9p2K4ytX06/gqbkf20WpmPEqnQAvmDjlbxFddWUe1yn65alY8ykeFbprP0lpHSKXnsZME ehFITZ1NCNOjS00JHpvm2ukyhOqDScGL/irluy4kqYVtb3uzaZRx0uQrW9QOg6dqb7SkfPj9NwVz5 P5iP/PNMgVaUIEmlCllcatVgWMfYEUAYERGXjeL8taoiukPD2sPdyPKkXWgqI+mhvQLSxDXIAdg8p Ke2anOB6dNx6OwMaLuXFhcF6i/FQWHCTjofBS0FrWyj+8Kk1t9JjyzuhK8QZhlCjYp3trn78d3vtq DaQdIfZw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lyz4m-000Kzj-Ql; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 15:58:04 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lyz4k-000Kz0-Tm; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 15:58:04 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b8-20020a17090a4888b02901725eedd346so1290482pjh.4; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y8RJ7NHLUH0UkXZQbqLTPlcYrodTSF7e3TMEWx7woGM=; b=lgKtrOTR354tIL484FZY5jhlhGr2OY+30iCkGKlUekblasixw+Y3S/gy46AfDYkp9i nzIbc6JGdWDS7ED30XpK3OlSVIP0dhSQ4j/oyvK93V8OusWqMQRd31kvfDW+fbqRajnG tlwvFHP1b4RnzkvWP4dxxadoiPML32G8zdGxVDGGSrHz2IlTWP0MtwR79AZ+4Ng2uwJd fqM/6L76+rPEKs1ZRimgbgxZhC2Hj+UKW0+ax/0MTIKAk4QC9j/lJLjCBDRL+J0MJxoT rWJJOcSV+R+bvfLNXtxYAK9vjAMNw28OMcGaFlztfP9YrxJY9lZBlrqFJ3lA2QGvSpGc kBWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iLocPvSIArhAPtDlGILM1kzIGTv+PHVYrmXPywYf4PhVFXsuU MXp2eK4O579Ty9Gbpmyo448JEhJd594= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVG+t6KRlrq32BvCj+MdsP5nTMwJW2oiZ8u2tKUXjf6dvTOkgsc5cIk2jTuqU8K/ihKx43kg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1944:: with SMTP id nk4mr420440pjb.66.1625155080441; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4000:d7:6a75:b07:a0d:8bd5? ([2601:647:4000:d7:6a75:b07:a0d:8bd5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t6sm9984750pjo.4.2021.07.01.08.57.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths To: Can Guo Cc: asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org, hongwus@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Stanley Chu , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Matthias Brugger , Bean Huo , Jaegeuk Kim , Adrian Hunter , Kiwoong Kim , Satya Tangirala , open list , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" References: <1621845419-14194-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org> <1621845419-14194-3-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org> <464097469b09752ce4ebb38c08f1a94a@codeaurora.org> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: <8971042b-e300-a1b4-7585-be9e0cf43030@acm.org> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 08:57:56 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <464097469b09752ce4ebb38c08f1a94a@codeaurora.org> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210701_085803_013079_3331031C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 6/28/21 10:41 PM, Can Guo wrote: > I am waiting for more infos/logs/dumps on Buganizor to look into it. > With above calltrace snippet, it is hard to figure out what is happening. > Besides, we've tested this series before go upstream and we didn't > see such problem. Hi Can, Jaegeuk has posted a fix as you may have noticed. Thanks, Bart. _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB93BC11F64 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7016F613CB for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:59:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7016F613CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HQ2JtVMOR7ZSv3ZXC7/InvJWJOvEmm9Wtom9+H5SA6g=; b=3berovV2S0y56SmfJIOlsvkYDt +XRgsOGj8psfGoPcl/MVO8ktc2iDXacZlLN/VdZH/BthqUfeBzjnfpPZzOwOitSkIUpcO1i7z3Owm 6a8nL8DDAJMC02ESXSw8rqmL/ctBz9xNgnp5GStF0AsJTkBvFV2y0b0y0pr2WI2z83rFUOEHmnink QXw8ZXN6Q84JRbqOh/NaudDLZfSE/Rtt1v7c9RgE3gD3cJUxE5OHpEn/K+5P/GfFZe0qVfY9aNelu yyQMg+6vxhh78mMkFUsM/F0mn3Kmxo1b+qHQkffVKUMVFy94qaMX/9D6aIayoLoTfZM1dwpu1TB1X 4UqvOUtg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lyz4o-000Kzr-JB; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 15:58:06 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lyz4k-000Kz0-Tm; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 15:58:04 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b8-20020a17090a4888b02901725eedd346so1290482pjh.4; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y8RJ7NHLUH0UkXZQbqLTPlcYrodTSF7e3TMEWx7woGM=; b=lgKtrOTR354tIL484FZY5jhlhGr2OY+30iCkGKlUekblasixw+Y3S/gy46AfDYkp9i nzIbc6JGdWDS7ED30XpK3OlSVIP0dhSQ4j/oyvK93V8OusWqMQRd31kvfDW+fbqRajnG tlwvFHP1b4RnzkvWP4dxxadoiPML32G8zdGxVDGGSrHz2IlTWP0MtwR79AZ+4Ng2uwJd fqM/6L76+rPEKs1ZRimgbgxZhC2Hj+UKW0+ax/0MTIKAk4QC9j/lJLjCBDRL+J0MJxoT rWJJOcSV+R+bvfLNXtxYAK9vjAMNw28OMcGaFlztfP9YrxJY9lZBlrqFJ3lA2QGvSpGc kBWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iLocPvSIArhAPtDlGILM1kzIGTv+PHVYrmXPywYf4PhVFXsuU MXp2eK4O579Ty9Gbpmyo448JEhJd594= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVG+t6KRlrq32BvCj+MdsP5nTMwJW2oiZ8u2tKUXjf6dvTOkgsc5cIk2jTuqU8K/ihKx43kg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1944:: with SMTP id nk4mr420440pjb.66.1625155080441; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4000:d7:6a75:b07:a0d:8bd5? ([2601:647:4000:d7:6a75:b07:a0d:8bd5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t6sm9984750pjo.4.2021.07.01.08.57.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths To: Can Guo Cc: asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org, hongwus@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Stanley Chu , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Matthias Brugger , Bean Huo , Jaegeuk Kim , Adrian Hunter , Kiwoong Kim , Satya Tangirala , open list , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" References: <1621845419-14194-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org> <1621845419-14194-3-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org> <464097469b09752ce4ebb38c08f1a94a@codeaurora.org> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: <8971042b-e300-a1b4-7585-be9e0cf43030@acm.org> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 08:57:56 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <464097469b09752ce4ebb38c08f1a94a@codeaurora.org> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210701_085803_013079_3331031C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 6/28/21 10:41 PM, Can Guo wrote: > I am waiting for more infos/logs/dumps on Buganizor to look into it. > With above calltrace snippet, it is hard to figure out what is happening. > Besides, we've tested this series before go upstream and we didn't > see such problem. Hi Can, Jaegeuk has posted a fix as you may have noticed. Thanks, Bart. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel