From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: mail@danrl.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id fc79c2cb for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.sealand.io (mx1.sealand.io [193.160.39.68]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8a45ef44 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: openwrt route_allowed_ips is inprecise From: Dan Luedtke In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:38:52 +0100 Message-Id: <89D5D16F-84AF-4FC6-9AA1-55EFCB6A3B9E@danrl.com> References: <20161220011334.GB16814@tuxmachine.polynome.dn42> To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > On 20 Dec 2016, at 04:14, Jason A. Donenfeld =20 > https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=3D5838c950859f1b55ad344e81b77a0= b71917ffd61 >=20 > Unless there are objections, that will ship with the next snapshot No objection but a remark: It is now even more complex and I think shell scr= ipt is not the right solution. This is pretty straightforward with netlink b= ut a pain to solve in shell. Regarding LEDE, netifd should track the routes being added and the extra rou= tes do not really do harm.=