From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzTwb-0005hh-0R; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:38:05 +0200 Received: by wwj26 with SMTP id 26so2166380wwj.0 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.202.70 with SMTP id fd6mr1034885wbb.114.1314970388179; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.96] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y12sm1712152wbo.25.2011.09.02.06.33.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:33:04 +0200 Message-Id: <89FA71E7-9402-4458-BC9E-42655707B091@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314969543.5939.586.camel@rex> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:38:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 2 sep. 2011, om 15:23 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19, Richard Purdie > wrote: >>> I fully support this merge. >>=20 >> I'm not so sure rushing into this is a great idea. Speaking as = someone >> who has problems trying to figure out where patches are intended for = and >> who tracks whether they've been applied, I do find the split = useful... >=20 > This is a matter of improving the pull request script; avoiding > duplicated places allow for easy sharing of information besides many > OE devels and users are not in oe-core list making duplicated work and > not being aware of changes. That sounds like people should just subscribe to oe-core if they want to = be aware of changes instead of merging the 2 lists.= From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzTwb-0005hh-0R; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:38:05 +0200 Received: by wwj26 with SMTP id 26so2166380wwj.0 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.202.70 with SMTP id fd6mr1034885wbb.114.1314970388179; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.96] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y12sm1712152wbo.25.2011.09.02.06.33.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:33:04 +0200 Message-Id: <89FA71E7-9402-4458-BC9E-42655707B091@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314969543.5939.586.camel@rex> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:38:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 2 sep. 2011, om 15:23 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:19, Richard Purdie > wrote: >>> I fully support this merge. >>=20 >> I'm not so sure rushing into this is a great idea. Speaking as = someone >> who has problems trying to figure out where patches are intended for = and >> who tracks whether they've been applied, I do find the split = useful... >=20 > This is a matter of improving the pull request script; avoiding > duplicated places allow for easy sharing of information besides many > OE devels and users are not in oe-core list making duplicated work and > not being aware of changes. That sounds like people should just subscribe to oe-core if they want to = be aware of changes instead of merging the 2 lists.=