All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: cache common rates with sink rates
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:59:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89e4c2345fb21bc59fdb39c87d07d25b8286c6df.1490712890.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1490712890.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1490712890.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

Now that source rates are static and sink rates are updated whenever
DPCD is updated, we can do and cache the intersection of them whenever
sink rates are updated. This reduces code complexity, as we don't have
to keep calling the functions to intersect. We also get rid of several
common rates arrays on stack.

Limiting the common rates by a max link rate can be done by picking the
first N elements of the cached common rates.

v2: get rid of the local common_rates variable (Manasi)
v3: don't clobber cached eDP rates on short pulse (Ville)

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  3 ++
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index e4650f1625cc..1808af6d635d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -284,17 +284,29 @@ static int intel_dp_rate_index(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
-				 int *common_rates)
+static void intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
-	int max_rate = intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate;
-	int i, common_len;
+	WARN_ON(!intel_dp->num_source_rates || !intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
 
-	common_len = intersect_rates(intel_dp->source_rates,
-				     intel_dp->num_source_rates,
-				     intel_dp->sink_rates,
-				     intel_dp->num_sink_rates,
-				     common_rates);
+	intel_dp->num_common_rates = intersect_rates(intel_dp->source_rates,
+						     intel_dp->num_source_rates,
+						     intel_dp->sink_rates,
+						     intel_dp->num_sink_rates,
+						     intel_dp->common_rates);
+
+	/* Paranoia, there should always be something in common. */
+	if (WARN_ON(intel_dp->num_common_rates == 0)) {
+		intel_dp->common_rates[0] = default_rates[0];
+		intel_dp->num_common_rates = 1;
+	}
+}
+
+/* get length of common rates potentially limited by max_rate */
+static int intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+					  int max_rate)
+{
+	const int *common_rates = intel_dp->common_rates;
+	int i, common_len = intel_dp->num_common_rates;
 
 	/* Limit results by potentially reduced max rate */
 	for (i = 0; i < common_len; i++) {
@@ -305,25 +317,23 @@ static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
-				    int *common_rates, int link_rate)
+static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int link_rate)
 {
 	int common_len;
 
-	common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
+	common_len = intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(intel_dp,
+						    intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate);
 
-	return intel_dp_rate_index(common_rates, common_len, link_rate);
+	return intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, common_len, link_rate);
 }
 
 int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 					    int link_rate, uint8_t lane_count)
 {
-	int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
+	const int *common_rates = intel_dp->common_rates;
 	int link_rate_index;
 
-	link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp,
-						   common_rates,
-						   link_rate);
+	link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp, link_rate);
 	if (link_rate_index > 0) {
 		intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate = common_rates[link_rate_index - 1];
 		intel_dp->max_sink_lane_count = lane_count;
@@ -1506,8 +1516,6 @@ static void snprintf_int_array(char *str, size_t len,
 
 static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
-	int common_len;
-	int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
 	char str[128]; /* FIXME: too big for stack? */
 
 	if ((drm_debug & DRM_UT_KMS) == 0)
@@ -1521,8 +1529,8 @@ static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 			   intel_dp->sink_rates, intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("sink rates: %s\n", str);
 
-	common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
-	snprintf_int_array(str, sizeof(str), common_rates, common_len);
+	snprintf_int_array(str, sizeof(str),
+			   intel_dp->common_rates, intel_dp->num_common_rates);
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("common rates: %s\n", str);
 }
 
@@ -1560,14 +1568,14 @@ bool intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 int
 intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
-	int rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
 	int len;
 
-	len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, rates);
+	len = intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(intel_dp,
+					     intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate);
 	if (WARN_ON(len <= 0))
 		return 162000;
 
-	return rates[len - 1];
+	return intel_dp->common_rates[len - 1];
 }
 
 int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
@@ -1636,11 +1644,11 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	int link_rate_index;
 	int bpp, mode_rate;
 	int link_avail, link_clock;
-	int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
 	int common_len;
 	uint8_t link_bw, rate_select;
 
-	common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
+	common_len = intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(intel_dp,
+						    intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate);
 
 	/* No common link rates between source and sink */
 	WARN_ON(common_len <= 0);
@@ -1678,7 +1686,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	/* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
 	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
 		link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp,
-							   common_rates,
 							   intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
 		if (link_rate_index >= 0)
 			min_clock = max_clock = link_rate_index;
@@ -1686,7 +1693,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	}
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
 		      "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
-		      max_lane_count, common_rates[max_clock],
+		      max_lane_count, intel_dp->common_rates[max_clock],
 		      adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
 
 	/* Walk through all bpp values. Luckily they're all nicely spaced with 2
@@ -1722,7 +1729,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 				lane_count <= max_lane_count;
 				lane_count <<= 1) {
 
-				link_clock = common_rates[clock];
+				link_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[clock];
 				link_avail = intel_dp_max_data_rate(link_clock,
 								    lane_count);
 
@@ -1754,7 +1761,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
 
 	pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp;
-	pipe_config->port_clock = common_rates[clock];
+	pipe_config->port_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[clock];
 
 	intel_dp_compute_rate(intel_dp, pipe_config->port_clock,
 			      &link_bw, &rate_select);
@@ -3715,6 +3722,8 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	else
 		intel_dp_set_sink_rates(intel_dp);
 
+	intel_dp_set_common_rates(intel_dp);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -3726,8 +3735,10 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 		return false;
 
 	/* Don't clobber cached eDP rates. */
-	if (!is_edp(intel_dp))
+	if (!is_edp(intel_dp)) {
 		intel_dp_set_sink_rates(intel_dp);
+		intel_dp_set_common_rates(intel_dp);
+	}
 
 	if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SINK_COUNT,
 			     &intel_dp->sink_count, 1) < 0)
@@ -3950,7 +3961,6 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
 	int status = 0;
 	int min_lane_count = 1;
-	int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
 	int link_rate_index, test_link_rate;
 	uint8_t test_lane_count, test_link_bw;
 	/* (DP CTS 1.2)
@@ -3979,7 +3989,6 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	/* Validate the requested link rate */
 	test_link_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(test_link_bw);
 	link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp,
-						   common_rates,
 						   test_link_rate);
 	if (link_rate_index < 0)
 		return DP_TEST_NAK;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index f8140b06679d..ec8985b20616 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -956,6 +956,9 @@ struct intel_dp {
 	int num_sink_rates;
 	int sink_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
 	bool use_rate_select;
+	/* intersection of source and sink rates */
+	int num_common_rates;
+	int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
 	/* Max lane count for the sink as per DPCD registers */
 	uint8_t max_sink_lane_count;
 	/* Max link BW for the sink as per DPCD registers */
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-28 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-28 14:59 [PATCH v3 00/14] drm/i915/dp: link rate and lane count refactoring Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] drm/i915/dp: use known correct array size in rate_to_index Jani Nikula
2017-04-04 19:16   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] drm/i915/dp: return errors from rate_to_index() Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 19:16   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-29  7:17     ` Jani Nikula
2017-04-04 19:17       ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] drm/i915/dp: rename rate_to_index() to intel_dp_rate_index() and reuse Jani Nikula
2017-04-04 19:19   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] drm/i915/dp: cache source rates at init Jani Nikula
2017-04-05  1:17   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] drm/i915/dp: generate and cache sink rate array for all DP, not just eDP 1.4 Jani Nikula
2017-04-05  1:20   ` Manasi Navare
2017-04-06 11:41     ` Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] drm/i915/dp: use the sink rates array for max sink rates Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 14:59 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-04-05  1:21   ` [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: cache common rates with " Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] drm/i915/dp: do not limit rate seek when not needed Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 21:02   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-29  9:23   ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2017-04-05  1:24     ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] drm/i915/dp: don't call the link parameters sink parameters Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 21:11   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] drm/i915/dp: add functions for max common link rate and lane count Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 21:47   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] drm/i915/mst: use max link not sink " Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 21:51   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] drm/i915/dp: localize link rate index variable more Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 22:00   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-29  7:22     ` Jani Nikula
2017-04-05  1:26       ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] drm/i915/dp: use readb and writeb calls for single byte DPCD access Jani Nikula
2017-04-05  1:28   ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] drm/i915/dp: read sink count to a temporary variable first Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 16:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: link rate and lane count refactoring (rev3) Patchwork
2017-03-29  9:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: link rate and lane count refactoring (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89e4c2345fb21bc59fdb39c87d07d25b8286c6df.1490712890.git.jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.