From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f72.google.com (mail-wm0-f72.google.com [74.125.82.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0896B0274 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:00:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f72.google.com with SMTP id u144so16325215wmu.1 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kb8si4206746wjb.260.2016.11.02.12.00.44 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Softlockup during memory allocation References: From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <89ee3413-71a3-403d-48fa-af325d40f8db@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:00:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Nikolay Borisov , Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner , Linux MM , "Paul E. McKenney" On 11/01/2016 09:12 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > In addition to that I believe there is something wrong > with the NR_PAGES_SCANNED stats since they are being negative. > I haven't looked into the code to see how this value is being > synchronized and if there is a possibility of it temporary going negative. This is because there's a shared counter and percpu diffs, and crash only looks at the shared counter. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org