Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 5/5] tools/bpftool: add support for in-kernel and named BTF in `btf show`

[Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>]

> On Nov 9, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> wrote:

[...]

> ...
> 
> Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

With one nit:

> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> index c96b56e8e3a4..ed5e97157241 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> @@ -742,9 +742,14 @@ show_btf_plain(struct bpf_btf_info *info, int fd,
> 	       struct btf_attach_table *btf_map_table)
> {
> 	struct btf_attach_point *obj;
> +	const char *name = u64_to_ptr(info->name);
> 	int n;
> 
> 	printf("%u: ", info->id);
> +	if (info->kernel_btf)
> +		printf("name [%s]  ", name);
> +	else if (name && name[0])
> +		printf("name %s  ", name);

Maybe explicitly say "name <anonymous>" for btf without a name? I think 
it will benefit plain output.  

> 	printf("size %uB", info->btf_size);
> 
> 	n = 0;

[...]