From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:23:04 +0000 Subject: [lustre-devel] Using loff_t or u64 for PFL port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8C539D08-D7F6-4B17-8A8D-01FEFF03BD2E@whamcloud.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org On Oct 28, 2018, at 21:49, James Simmons wrote: > > > While doing the PFL port I noticed a inconsistent use of loff_t and u64. > While in Greg's branch several patches landed to make the prototypes > match the function with changing any unmatching loff_t/u64 to use u64. > I don't know if using u64 solely as the proper solution. What is the > proper unit to use? James, could you please clarify what part of the code you are referencing? Cheers, Andreas --- Andreas Dilger Principal Lustre Architect Whamcloud