From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer
	queues	than bonding device
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:26:53 +0000
Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219FB2C51@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1449249260-15165-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20160203112854.GA13036@bricha3-MOBL3> <56B219EF.7040105@intel.com>
 <2402415.75bQrkATMT@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF053C342
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:26:59 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <2402415.75bQrkATMT@xps13>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Stephen,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 3:21 PM
> To: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues
> than bonding device
>=20
> 2016-02-03 15:17, Declan Doherty:
> > On 03/02/16 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > Hi Eric, Stephen, Declan,
> > >
> > > all patches of the set apart from this one and the next (nos 6 & 7)
> > > have no comments and have been acked. Is there a resolution on these
> > > two patches, so they can be acked and merged?
> >
> > Hey Bruce, Eric, Stephen, sorry about leaving this patchset hanging
> > around. Can you apply patches 1-5 & patch 8 in this patch set. I've
> > reviewed and acked all of those patches and I believe they are good
> > tof go. I need to give further feedback on patches 6 and 7, as I would
> > like to avoid bring further rte_ring buffering into the bonded device
> > if possible and I think this should be possible but I haven't had time
> > to prototype any alternatives but that shouldn't stop the other
> > patches being applied.
>=20
> Picking some patches in a series makes tracking confusing.
> The better solution is to re-send the series with only the desired patche=
s.
> When re-sending, do not forget to embed the acks from the previous
> version, thanks.

Could you send a V2 of this patch set without patches 6 and 7.
The other 6 patches have been acked  already.

Regards,

Bernard.