From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] app/test_pmd: add tests for new API's Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:35:14 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C21A090B2D@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1475231418-30717-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <2850526.ogb5UjoHqb@xps13> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C21A090A8A@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <1615821.fhDo4YvI1t@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Shah, Rahul R" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "az5157@att.com" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C610F58D4 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:35:20 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1615821.fhDo4YvI1t@xps13> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] app/test_pmd: add tests for > > > new API's > > > > > > 2016-10-11 16:09, Ferruh Yigit: > > > > This will cause a compilation error for shared libraries. Because > > > > PMDs not linked against application when compiled as shared > > > > library but used as plugins. > > > > > > > > Since it has been decided to have NIC specific APIs, we need to > > > > re-work that approach to fix shared library compilation. > > > > > > If testpmd uses the ixgbe API, it must be linked with the PMD. > > > Is there any issue adapting the testpmd makefile? > > > Hope that dlopen an already linked PMD is nicely managed. > > > > The ixgbe API will be used by other apps, for example Virtual > > Function Daemon (VFD) Moving the following line in rte.app.mak solves > > the problem > > > > Line 117: _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) +=3D - > lrte_pmd_ixgbe > > > > To Line 103. > > > > Will this be acceptable? >=20 > I think we must not link PMD in the general case but let this responsibil= ity to > the application in case it uses some specific functions. > Does it make sense? Yes, ok, will just modify the testpmd makefile for this case. Regards, Bernard.