From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API bits Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 11:26:17 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C24E0CD93C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1525944544-13513-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <20180515162211.7030-1-adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C24E0CD20F@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <20180516143517.GA6497@6wind.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C24E0CD818@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <20180517112045.GE6497@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" To: Adrien Mazarguil Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180517112045.GE6497@6wind.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Adrien, > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API > > > > > bits > > > > > > > > > > The following commits lack MAINTAINERS entries for this mess. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 4d73b6fb9907 ("doc: add generic flow API guide") > > > > > Fixes: 19c90af6285c ("app/testpmd: add flow command") > > > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil > > > > > Cc: Bernard Iremonger > > > > > --- > > > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index > > > > > bd08d4292..187817fff > > > > > 100644 > > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > > @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ F: devtools/test-null.sh Flow API > > > > > M: Adrien Mazarguil > > > > > T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net > > > > > +F: app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c > > > > > +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst > > > > > > > > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > > > > Should be added to the list of flow related files. > > > > > > I did not add it because there is no way to split responsibility on > > > a documentation section basis AFAIK, and only a fraction of this > > > file contains information about rte_flow-related stuff. > > > > > > -- > > > Adrien Mazarguil > > > 6WIND > > > > There are already several maintainers for testpmd, adding another maint= ainer > for the flow parts of this file should be ok (I think). >=20 > True, however providing an exact file name instead of a directory or wild= card > makes me the main maintainer/contact for that specific file (e.g. "app/te= st- > pmd/cmdline_flow.c" vs. "app/test-pmd"), basically I do not want to be > responsible for the entirety of testpmd's documentation. >=20 > How about the following instead: another patch that extracts the flow > command documentation in its own file (testpmd_flow.rst?) using the inclu= de > directive (somewhat like cmdline_flow.c). This patch will update MAINTAIN= ERS > accordingly. >=20 > -- > Adrien Mazarguil > 6WIND Sounds good to me. Regards, Bernard.