From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mrout3.yahoo.com ([216.145.54.173]:21722 "EHLO mrout3.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759520Ab2C2QGR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:06:17 -0400 From: Kevin Graham To: "Myklebust, Trond" CC: Jim Rees , Vivek Trivedi , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , Namjae Jeon , "amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com" Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:52:57 -0700 Subject: Re: NFS: low read/stat performance on small files Message-ID: <8E325A03-6EE9-4303-AB52-8BA252E39325@corp.yahoo.com> References: <20120323114913.GB24489@umich.edu> <1332505002.20500.14.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> In-Reply-To: <1332505002.20500.14.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mar 23, 2012, at 5:16 AM, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > All these tasks have to be done in series (you cannot do them in parallel), and so the > latency of each task is limited by the round-trip time to the server. Will the v4 client at least collapse them into a single compound op?