On 6/2/21 3:03 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Andrew Morton (2021-06-01 17:26:59) >> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 06:45:55 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: >> >> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled' >> > if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled)) >> > ^ >> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled' >> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled' >> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 'slub_debug_enabled' >> > >> mm/slub.c:4464:6: error: invalid argument type 'void' to unary expression >> > if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled)) >> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Thanks. Stephen, how about this? > > Looks good to me. Thanks for the quick fix! > >> >> --- a/mm/slub.c~slub-force-on-no_hash_pointers-when-slub_debug-is-enabled-fix >> +++ a/mm/slub.c >> @@ -117,12 +117,26 @@ >> */ >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG >> + >> #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON >> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(slub_debug_enabled); >> #else >> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(slub_debug_enabled); >> #endif >> -#endif >> + >> +static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void) >> +{ >> + return static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled); > > To make this even better it could be > > return static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON, &slub_debug_enabled); > >> +} >> + >> +#else /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */ >> + >> +static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void) >> +{ >> + return false; >> +} >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */ >> >> static inline bool kmem_cache_debug(struct kmem_cache *s) >> { >> @@ -4493,7 +4507,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void) >> slub_max_order = 0; >> >> /* Print slub debugging pointers without hashing */ >> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled)) >> + if (__slub_debug_enabled()) A minimal fix would be to put this under #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG and use static_key_enabled() as we don't need the jump label optimization for init code. But the current fix works. > > It would be super cool if static branches could be optimized out when > they're never changed by any code, nor exported to code, just tested in > conditions. I've no idea if that is the case though. > >> no_hash_pointers_enable(NULL); >> >> kmem_cache_node = &boot_kmem_cache_node; >