From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix typo in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant name Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:25:44 -0600 Message-ID: <8acaf8d7-17c9-e8ec-c60a-18a011b4c34f@kernel.dk> References: <20181006175114.GA10435@asgard.redhat.com> <20181025141927.GB19512@asgard.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181025141927.GB19512@asgard.redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eugene Syromiatnikov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexander Viro , Jeff Layton , "J. Bruce Fields" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Shaohua Li , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 10/25/18 8:19 AM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 07:51:14PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: >> Hello. >> >> This is a small fix of a typo (or, more specifically, some remnant of >> the old patch version spelling) in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant, >> which is named as RWF_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET currently. Since the name >> with "H" is used in man page and everywhere else, it's probably worth >> to make the name used in the fcntl.h UAPI header in line with it. >> Second follow-up patch updates (the sole) usage site of this constant >> in kernel to use the new spelling. >> >> The old name is retained as it is part of UAPI now. > > Hello, are there issues with the patches? I only got the 0/2 patch, none of the two others.. -- Jens Axboe