From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752706AbcHQO2T (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:28:19 -0400 Received: from mail.etorok.net ([62.210.252.135]:42942 "EHLO mail.etorok.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751539AbcHQO2R (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:28:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=etorok.net; h=subject:to :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=ml; b=E9+k1Ra9 fkU3TMOvFIsan+eWww3NexXJ/atLoZ/H1eNmxAsXQr4nsByOnf/ZpIByebGjQPTs eC9ZtmlAExwuDc2Wz+e3IFES9hfBVtZVOehLvpE0wtFpT73AvdPkpQsyrgX7dcMy MiJ8qmvzi5dzHfUoiUUZjUt+Ts8WgxT9b2U= Subject: Re: 4.7.0-rc7 ext4 error in dx_probe To: "Darrick J. Wong" , "Theodore Ts'o" , Johannes Stezenbach , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <20160718141723.GA8809@sig21.net> <7849bcd2-142d-0a12-0a04-7d0c3b6d788f@etorok.net> <20160805103544.kbt7znbzypvi5ofx@sig21.net> <20160805170228.GA19960@birch.djwong.org> <20160805181136.mcjnnvuo5m6kpxzb@sig21.net> <20160805191548.GD19960@birch.djwong.org> <20160808035634.GA16193@thunk.org> <20160808062810.GC8590@birch.djwong.org> From: =?UTF-8?B?VMO2csO2ayBFZHdpbg==?= Message-ID: <8b8fff2d-5c89-856a-65d2-f6962b875f8f@etorok.net> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:27:25 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160808062810.GC8590@birch.djwong.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016-08-08 09:28, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:56:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:15:48PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >>>>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/ext4/inode.c?id=b47820edd1634dc1208f9212b7ecfb4230610a23 >>>> >>>> I added the patch, rebuilt and rebooted. It will take some time >>>> before I'll report back since the issue is so hard to reproduce. >>> >>> FWIW I could trigger it reliably by running a bunch of directory traversal >>> programs simultaneously on the same directory. I have a script that fires >>> up multiple mutts pointing to the Maildirs for the high traffic Linux lists. >> >> Hmm, I wonder if we should request that this patch be backported to >> -stable. Darrick, what do you think? > > Seems like an excellent idea. Hi, I see 4.7.1. was released, however before testing it in the changelog I can't see the inode.c commit with the checksum fix. Is there another commit that would provide an equivalent fix, or is the fix not part of 4.7.1? Best regards, --Edwin