From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423331AbXBHUfh (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:35:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423327AbXBHUfh (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:35:37 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]:38509 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423331AbXBHUfg (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:35:36 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l6YliAcxqFbKA4FLSCTSccTrp+5V/XAqtHXsmpVQRBPjfBF3tJUWBeOj3hItxEORuMSDzzr/unD2FzSbBhr0BjXhhGsbiJh6+VX8jcp3fnUOIwTJdD4Ku8dCk7VeZykPhakKE9epEzrj2PNwv/xIpG9AkORaCLQ2MSGkfFHQZr0= Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0702081235v2e083301g49c1950fa61d8113@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:35:34 -0500 From: "Mike Frysinger" To: "Oleg Verych" Subject: Re: + search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070208202535.GX22699@flower.upol.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200702080607.l1867c0D006861@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <8bd0f97a0702080628u5038191dm74139a7dd7bff909@mail.gmail.com> <20070208202535.GX22699@flower.upol.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych wrote: > > >proposition is to substitute: > > > "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)" > > >with > > > "mkimage" > > > > this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical > > mkimage-missing scenario ... > > You are interested in presents of `mkimage', but yet we discussing its > missing, or "Error -> Don't care" behavior. i'm interested in having the system work for the Blackfin port and that's it. if people want to redefine the current standard of how u-boot images are generated, then go for it and get the approval of all the existing arches. there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be taking some other form. so if you dont like the mkuboot.sh script, fine, have at it with rewriting the system ... otherwise the patch i proposed should continue on for inclusion. -mike