From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752074AbZDRRvZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:51:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752219AbZDRRvP (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:51:15 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:5791 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751753AbZDRRvP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:51:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VKI7fViK+TYrkyywZqhKYcCg3oHOyXbiiCMfwA5TItVi71uBXb2G/fguGKknjQmoMv POE29X7AsJtKfCUApWyfLyh3cF8kVHpCYS4QRPW7LPwjVdlHwRWATRFz9Jy665MpAV9j z6d161R5dOroMeeXPeWfDgfeFpnrdiIHdUVHo= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090415154817.GC5989@nowhere> References: <1239753659-11790-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <8bd0f97a0904141917g3496f526ifc4fe0bd41c3d1c7@mail.gmail.com> <20090415154817.GC5989@nowhere> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:51:14 -0400 Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0904181051m4fe5c09dw3a727de46507767e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vsprintf: introduce %pf From: Mike Frysinger To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Zhaolei , Tom Zanussi , Li Zefan , LKML , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:48, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:38:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 20:00, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> > > - * - 'F' For symbolic function descriptor pointers >> > > + * - 'F' For symbolic function descriptor pointers with asm offset >> > > + * - 'f' For simple function symbol >> > >> > "asm" is weird here as it isnt an assembly offset (not that i have any >> > idea what an "assembly offset" even means).  just say "offset". >> >> Or perhaps better: function offset, as it ususally means the offset into >> the function. > > > Ok, I've tried to keep a balance between all your comments. > Tell me what your think about this v2: Acked-by: Mike Frysinger -mike