From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD761C7EE22 for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6cc-0007Qb-CP; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:46:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6cZ-0007Pr-5g; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:46:15 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6cX-0007co-3X; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:46:14 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 34BDdUbV020181; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:46:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=Mbwmr3RZdwYeePdOsgL2h9TMhBvswU6R/ZKssBXh554=; b=GsIhgc95LlPdgAeyCn06NCA5xw6q0wy4DSQG7Twag+cwkq3QMZ+6y6Tzz1DnCBnqASnX NBzp0ZowCDzsVyfTdoeq1A47ew9vu0KsqqtfVx8PGRci/NJRQDajWgw9yy5G8RNq7Exl p2tcHToX6uDL5YnlRXME6s5fze17JZDeH+R9gdbqM6RNG7yN4+2EPTgg9qS7mpZstD0d inoj3ExWBCWLhN8P8+8W7Pqy4te5PwybCb9gOh7zQAKNuQtl1nq6H3YZRiDFeJA/vEj4 migYN4m4xeMKaAiJc7nPnskFIeWMbxy1ksqmguEyPcP+oebQaORCyRa2lCpiuuh1VHe8 Kw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qgyydkt2k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 May 2023 13:46:09 +0000 Received: from m0356517.ppops.net (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 34BDeMYp028587; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:54 GMT Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qgyydks1b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 34BDfc8c002869; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:25 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qf7s8he1m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:25 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 34BDjNYC197200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:23 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070732004E; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906CE20043; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.171.14.79] (unknown [9.171.14.79]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:45:22 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <8c1e5072a92d3160d7f906208e0b9f4c78fdaf84.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux-user/s390x: Fix single-stepping SVC From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Michael Tokarev , Laurent Vivier , Richard Henderson , David Hildenbrand , Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 15:45:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20230510230213.330134-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> <20230510230213.330134-2-iii@linux.ibm.com> <10879612-818e-a1af-5994-56ef84c524cb@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ojwf2YlSBN7mKHFZx9di04fztfqLAA7D X-Proofpoint-GUID: pZCtbPumH8NbVVEKjZqp2Q5kzGSjf-as Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-05-11_10,2023-05-05_01,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=565 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2304280000 definitions=main-2305110117 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=iii@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 15:32 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 11.05.2023 14:20, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 13:55 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >=20 > > > Is it a -stable material? >=20 > > While I would personally love to see this in -stable, I don't think > > it > > fits the official criteria - it's not a security fix and it's not a > > regression. >=20 > I'm not sure I follow. It's definitely okay to include a bug fix into > -stable, this has been done countless times in the past.. >=20 > /mjt Okay, then let's include it into -stable. It's just that I'm not too familiar with the QEMU -stable process, so I read [1], and it sounded quite strict. [1] https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/stable-process.html