RE: [PATCH] i2c: imx: double check IIF in case interrupt lost

["fugang.duan-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org" <fugang.duan-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>]

From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:54 PM
>To: Uwe Kleine-König
>Cc: Duan Fugang-B38611; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: double check IIF in case interrupt lost
>
>On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:18:14AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:14:15AM +0000, fugang.duan@freescale.com
>wrote:
>> > I am sorry to tell you I don't have the reproduced platform for the
>> > issue since the Issue was found at one platform of customer of
>> > freescale, and I debug the issue with Customer, at last generate the
>> > patch for customer platform, test fine. So I want to
>> Does the customer use the -rt patch?
>
>Valid question.
>
No, customer don't use -rt patch.

>> > Submit the patch. In our platforms, it is not easy to reproduce the
>issue.
>> I tend to not want the patch in mainline. IMHO a wrong workaround that
>> fixes the issue only for 95% is worse than an unfixed driver.
>
>I agree. Yet, I'd like to keep the information we have so far. Anyone
>cares to send a patch adding a comment to the driver with what is known
>yet?
>
>Thanks,
>
>   Wolfram

I agree your decision.

Thanks,
Andy