* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah, jakub.kicinski,
quentin.monnet
Cc: guro, jiong.wang, sdf, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
v3 changes:
* (maybe) better cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin
* added special case in bpf_program__pin for programs with single
instances
v2 changes:
* addressed comments/style issues from Jakub Kicinski & Quentin Monnet
* removed logic that populates jump table
* added cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin
This patch series adds support for loading and attaching flow dissector
programs from the bpftool:
* first patch fixes flow dissector section name in the selftests (so
libbpf auto-detection works)
* second patch adds proper cleanup to bpf_object__pin which is now being
used to attach all flow dissector progs/maps
* third patch adds special case in bpf_program__pin for programs with
single instances (we don't create <prog>/0 pin anymore, just <prog>)
* forth patch adds actual support to the bpftool
See forth patch for the description/details.
Stanislav Fomichev (4):
selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
libbpf: bpf_program__pin: add special case for instances.nr == 1
bpftool: support loading flow dissector
.../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++-
tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 ++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 11 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
9 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
v3 changes:
* (maybe) better cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin
* added special case in bpf_program__pin for programs with single
instances
v2 changes:
* addressed comments/style issues from Jakub Kicinski & Quentin Monnet
* removed logic that populates jump table
* added cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin
This patch series adds support for loading and attaching flow dissector
programs from the bpftool:
* first patch fixes flow dissector section name in the selftests (so
libbpf auto-detection works)
* second patch adds proper cleanup to bpf_object__pin which is now being
used to attach all flow dissector progs/maps
* third patch adds special case in bpf_program__pin for programs with
single instances (we don't create <prog>/0 pin anymore, just <prog>)
* forth patch adds actual support to the bpftool
See forth patch for the description/details.
Stanislav Fomichev (4):
selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
libbpf: bpf_program__pin: add special case for instances.nr == 1
bpftool: support loading flow dissector
.../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++-
tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 ++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 11 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
9 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
v3 changes:
* (maybe) better cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin
* added special case in bpf_program__pin for programs with single
instances
v2 changes:
* addressed comments/style issues from Jakub Kicinski & Quentin Monnet
* removed logic that populates jump table
* added cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin
This patch series adds support for loading and attaching flow dissector
programs from the bpftool:
* first patch fixes flow dissector section name in the selftests (so
libbpf auto-detection works)
* second patch adds proper cleanup to bpf_object__pin which is now being
used to attach all flow dissector progs/maps
* third patch adds special case in bpf_program__pin for programs with
single instances (we don't create <prog>/0 pin anymore, just <prog>)
* forth patch adds actual support to the bpftool
See forth patch for the description/details.
Stanislav Fomichev (4):
selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
libbpf: bpf_program__pin: add special case for instances.nr == 1
bpftool: support loading flow dissector
.../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++-
tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 ++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 11 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
9 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah, jakub.kicinski,
quentin.monnet
Cc: guro, jiong.wang, sdf, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
Makes it compatible with the logic that derives program type
from section name in libbpf_prog_type_by_name.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
index 107350a7821d..b9798f558ca7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static __always_inline int parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __be16 proto)
return BPF_DROP;
}
-SEC("dissect")
+SEC("flow_dissector")
int _dissect(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!skb->vlan_present)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
index c0fb073b5eab..d23d4da66b83 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ else
fi
# Attach BPF program
-./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s dissect
+./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s flow_dissector
# Setup
tc qdisc add dev lo ingress
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
Makes it compatible with the logic that derives program type
from section name in libbpf_prog_type_by_name.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
index 107350a7821d..b9798f558ca7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static __always_inline int parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __be16 proto)
return BPF_DROP;
}
-SEC("dissect")
+SEC("flow_dissector")
int _dissect(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!skb->vlan_present)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
index c0fb073b5eab..d23d4da66b83 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ else
fi
# Attach BPF program
-./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s dissect
+./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s flow_dissector
# Setup
tc qdisc add dev lo ingress
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
Makes it compatible with the logic that derives program type
from section name in libbpf_prog_type_by_name.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
index 107350a7821d..b9798f558ca7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static __always_inline int parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __be16 proto)
return BPF_DROP;
}
-SEC("dissect")
+SEC("flow_dissector")
int _dissect(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
if (!skb->vlan_present)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
index c0fb073b5eab..d23d4da66b83 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ else
fi
# Attach BPF program
-./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s dissect
+./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s flow_dissector
# Setup
tc qdisc add dev lo ingress
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah, jakub.kicinski,
quentin.monnet
Cc: guro, jiong.wang, sdf, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 11 ++
2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d6e62e90e8d4..db84c85554e7 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1699,6 +1699,34 @@ int bpf_program__pin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path,
return 0;
}
+int bpf_program__unpin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path,
+ int instance)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (prog == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid program pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (instance < 0 || instance >= prog->instances.nr) {
+ pr_warning("invalid prog instance %d of prog %s (max %d)\n",
+ instance, prog->section_name, prog->instances.nr);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = unlink(path);
+ if (err != 0)
+ return -errno;
+ pr_debug("unpinned program '%s'\n", path);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int make_dir(const char *path)
{
char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
@@ -1737,6 +1765,64 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
if (err)
return err;
+ for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%d", path, i);
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin;
+ }
+
+ err = bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_unpin;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_unpin:
+ for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%d", path, i);
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ }
+
+ rmdir(path);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
+{
+ int i, err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (prog == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid program pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (prog->instances.nr <= 0) {
+ pr_warning("no instances of prog %s to pin\n",
+ prog->section_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
char buf[PATH_MAX];
int len;
@@ -1747,11 +1833,15 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
- err = bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ err = bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, buf, i);
if (err)
return err;
}
+ err = rmdir(path);
+ if (err)
+ return -errno;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1776,6 +1866,28 @@ int bpf_map__pin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
}
pr_debug("pinned map '%s'\n", path);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf_map__unpin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (map == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid map pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = unlink(path);
+ if (err != 0)
+ return -errno;
+ pr_debug("unpinned map '%s'\n", path);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1803,14 +1915,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
bpf_map__name(map));
- if (len < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
- else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
+ }
err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
}
bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
@@ -1819,17 +1934,56 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
prog->section_name);
- if (len < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
- else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
+ }
err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
}
return 0;
+
+err_unpin_programs:
+ for (prog = bpf_program__prev(prog, obj);
+ prog != NULL;
+ prog = bpf_program__prev(prog, obj)) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+ prog->section_name);
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
+ }
+
+err_unpin_maps:
+ for (map = bpf_map__prev(map, obj);
+ map != NULL;
+ map = bpf_map__prev(map, obj)) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+ bpf_map__name(map));
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_map__unpin(map, buf);
+ }
+
+ return err;
}
void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
@@ -1918,23 +2072,20 @@ void *bpf_object__priv(struct bpf_object *obj)
}
static struct bpf_program *
-__bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+__bpf_program__iter(struct bpf_program *p, struct bpf_object *obj, int i)
{
- size_t idx;
+ ssize_t idx;
if (!obj->programs)
return NULL;
- /* First handler */
- if (prev == NULL)
- return &obj->programs[0];
- if (prev->obj != obj) {
+ if (p->obj != obj) {
pr_warning("error: program handler doesn't match object\n");
return NULL;
}
- idx = (prev - obj->programs) + 1;
- if (idx >= obj->nr_programs)
+ idx = (p - obj->programs) + i;
+ if (idx >= obj->nr_programs || idx < 0)
return NULL;
return &obj->programs[idx];
}
@@ -1944,8 +2095,29 @@ bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
{
struct bpf_program *prog = prev;
+ if (prev == NULL)
+ return obj->programs;
+
+ do {
+ prog = __bpf_program__iter(prog, obj, 1);
+ } while (prog && bpf_program__is_function_storage(prog, obj));
+
+ return prog;
+}
+
+struct bpf_program *
+bpf_program__prev(struct bpf_program *next, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ struct bpf_program *prog = next;
+
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ if (!obj->nr_programs)
+ return NULL;
+ return obj->programs + obj->nr_programs - 1;
+ }
+
do {
- prog = __bpf_program__next(prog, obj);
+ prog = __bpf_program__iter(prog, obj, -1);
} while (prog && bpf_program__is_function_storage(prog, obj));
return prog;
@@ -2272,10 +2444,10 @@ void bpf_map__set_ifindex(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 ifindex)
map->map_ifindex = ifindex;
}
-struct bpf_map *
-bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+static struct bpf_map *
+__bpf_map__iter(struct bpf_map *m, struct bpf_object *obj, int i)
{
- size_t idx;
+ ssize_t idx;
struct bpf_map *s, *e;
if (!obj || !obj->maps)
@@ -2284,21 +2456,39 @@ bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
s = obj->maps;
e = obj->maps + obj->nr_maps;
- if (prev == NULL)
- return s;
-
- if ((prev < s) || (prev >= e)) {
+ if ((m < s) || (m >= e)) {
pr_warning("error in %s: map handler doesn't belong to object\n",
__func__);
return NULL;
}
- idx = (prev - obj->maps) + 1;
- if (idx >= obj->nr_maps)
+ idx = (m - obj->maps) + i;
+ if (idx >= obj->nr_maps || idx < 0)
return NULL;
return &obj->maps[idx];
}
+struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ if (prev == NULL)
+ return obj->maps;
+
+ return __bpf_map__iter(prev, obj, 1);
+}
+
+struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__prev(struct bpf_map *next, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ if (!obj->nr_maps)
+ return NULL;
+ return obj->maps + obj->nr_maps - 1;
+ }
+
+ return __bpf_map__iter(next, obj, -1);
+}
+
struct bpf_map *
bpf_object__find_map_by_name(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *name)
{
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 1f3468dad8b2..785b27f761de 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ LIBBPF_API struct bpf_program *bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prog,
(pos) != NULL; \
(pos) = bpf_program__next((pos), (obj)))
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_program *bpf_program__prev(struct bpf_program *prog,
+ struct bpf_object *obj);
+
typedef void (*bpf_program_clear_priv_t)(struct bpf_program *,
void *);
@@ -131,7 +134,11 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__fd(struct bpf_program *prog);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__pin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog,
const char *path,
int instance);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__unpin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog,
+ const char *path,
+ int instance);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path);
LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__unload(struct bpf_program *prog);
struct bpf_insn;
@@ -260,6 +267,9 @@ bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_object *obj);
(pos) != NULL; \
(pos) = bpf_map__next((pos), (obj)))
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__prev(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_object *obj);
+
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__fd(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API const struct bpf_map_def *bpf_map__def(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API const char *bpf_map__name(struct bpf_map *map);
@@ -274,6 +284,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__reuse_fd(struct bpf_map *map, int fd);
LIBBPF_API bool bpf_map__is_offload_neutral(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API void bpf_map__set_ifindex(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 ifindex);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__pin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__unpin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path);
LIBBPF_API long libbpf_get_error(const void *ptr);
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 11 ++
2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d6e62e90e8d4..db84c85554e7 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1699,6 +1699,34 @@ int bpf_program__pin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path,
return 0;
}
+int bpf_program__unpin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path,
+ int instance)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (prog == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid program pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (instance < 0 || instance >= prog->instances.nr) {
+ pr_warning("invalid prog instance %d of prog %s (max %d)\n",
+ instance, prog->section_name, prog->instances.nr);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = unlink(path);
+ if (err != 0)
+ return -errno;
+ pr_debug("unpinned program '%s'\n", path);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int make_dir(const char *path)
{
char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
@@ -1737,6 +1765,64 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
if (err)
return err;
+ for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%d", path, i);
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin;
+ }
+
+ err = bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_unpin;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_unpin:
+ for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%d", path, i);
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ }
+
+ rmdir(path);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
+{
+ int i, err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (prog == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid program pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (prog->instances.nr <= 0) {
+ pr_warning("no instances of prog %s to pin\n",
+ prog->section_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
char buf[PATH_MAX];
int len;
@@ -1747,11 +1833,15 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
- err = bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ err = bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, buf, i);
if (err)
return err;
}
+ err = rmdir(path);
+ if (err)
+ return -errno;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1776,6 +1866,28 @@ int bpf_map__pin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
}
pr_debug("pinned map '%s'\n", path);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf_map__unpin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (map == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid map pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = unlink(path);
+ if (err != 0)
+ return -errno;
+ pr_debug("unpinned map '%s'\n", path);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1803,14 +1915,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
bpf_map__name(map));
- if (len < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
- else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
+ }
err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
}
bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
@@ -1819,17 +1934,56 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
prog->section_name);
- if (len < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
- else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
+ }
err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
}
return 0;
+
+err_unpin_programs:
+ for (prog = bpf_program__prev(prog, obj);
+ prog != NULL;
+ prog = bpf_program__prev(prog, obj)) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+ prog->section_name);
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
+ }
+
+err_unpin_maps:
+ for (map = bpf_map__prev(map, obj);
+ map != NULL;
+ map = bpf_map__prev(map, obj)) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+ bpf_map__name(map));
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_map__unpin(map, buf);
+ }
+
+ return err;
}
void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
@@ -1918,23 +2072,20 @@ void *bpf_object__priv(struct bpf_object *obj)
}
static struct bpf_program *
-__bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+__bpf_program__iter(struct bpf_program *p, struct bpf_object *obj, int i)
{
- size_t idx;
+ ssize_t idx;
if (!obj->programs)
return NULL;
- /* First handler */
- if (prev == NULL)
- return &obj->programs[0];
- if (prev->obj != obj) {
+ if (p->obj != obj) {
pr_warning("error: program handler doesn't match object\n");
return NULL;
}
- idx = (prev - obj->programs) + 1;
- if (idx >= obj->nr_programs)
+ idx = (p - obj->programs) + i;
+ if (idx >= obj->nr_programs || idx < 0)
return NULL;
return &obj->programs[idx];
}
@@ -1944,8 +2095,29 @@ bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
{
struct bpf_program *prog = prev;
+ if (prev == NULL)
+ return obj->programs;
+
+ do {
+ prog = __bpf_program__iter(prog, obj, 1);
+ } while (prog && bpf_program__is_function_storage(prog, obj));
+
+ return prog;
+}
+
+struct bpf_program *
+bpf_program__prev(struct bpf_program *next, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ struct bpf_program *prog = next;
+
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ if (!obj->nr_programs)
+ return NULL;
+ return obj->programs + obj->nr_programs - 1;
+ }
+
do {
- prog = __bpf_program__next(prog, obj);
+ prog = __bpf_program__iter(prog, obj, -1);
} while (prog && bpf_program__is_function_storage(prog, obj));
return prog;
@@ -2272,10 +2444,10 @@ void bpf_map__set_ifindex(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 ifindex)
map->map_ifindex = ifindex;
}
-struct bpf_map *
-bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+static struct bpf_map *
+__bpf_map__iter(struct bpf_map *m, struct bpf_object *obj, int i)
{
- size_t idx;
+ ssize_t idx;
struct bpf_map *s, *e;
if (!obj || !obj->maps)
@@ -2284,21 +2456,39 @@ bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
s = obj->maps;
e = obj->maps + obj->nr_maps;
- if (prev == NULL)
- return s;
-
- if ((prev < s) || (prev >= e)) {
+ if ((m < s) || (m >= e)) {
pr_warning("error in %s: map handler doesn't belong to object\n",
__func__);
return NULL;
}
- idx = (prev - obj->maps) + 1;
- if (idx >= obj->nr_maps)
+ idx = (m - obj->maps) + i;
+ if (idx >= obj->nr_maps || idx < 0)
return NULL;
return &obj->maps[idx];
}
+struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ if (prev == NULL)
+ return obj->maps;
+
+ return __bpf_map__iter(prev, obj, 1);
+}
+
+struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__prev(struct bpf_map *next, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ if (!obj->nr_maps)
+ return NULL;
+ return obj->maps + obj->nr_maps - 1;
+ }
+
+ return __bpf_map__iter(next, obj, -1);
+}
+
struct bpf_map *
bpf_object__find_map_by_name(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *name)
{
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 1f3468dad8b2..785b27f761de 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ LIBBPF_API struct bpf_program *bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prog,
(pos) != NULL; \
(pos) = bpf_program__next((pos), (obj)))
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_program *bpf_program__prev(struct bpf_program *prog,
+ struct bpf_object *obj);
+
typedef void (*bpf_program_clear_priv_t)(struct bpf_program *,
void *);
@@ -131,7 +134,11 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__fd(struct bpf_program *prog);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__pin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog,
const char *path,
int instance);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__unpin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog,
+ const char *path,
+ int instance);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path);
LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__unload(struct bpf_program *prog);
struct bpf_insn;
@@ -260,6 +267,9 @@ bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_object *obj);
(pos) != NULL; \
(pos) = bpf_map__next((pos), (obj)))
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__prev(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_object *obj);
+
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__fd(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API const struct bpf_map_def *bpf_map__def(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API const char *bpf_map__name(struct bpf_map *map);
@@ -274,6 +284,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__reuse_fd(struct bpf_map *map, int fd);
LIBBPF_API bool bpf_map__is_offload_neutral(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API void bpf_map__set_ifindex(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 ifindex);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__pin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__unpin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path);
LIBBPF_API long libbpf_get_error(const void *ptr);
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 11 ++
2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d6e62e90e8d4..db84c85554e7 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1699,6 +1699,34 @@ int bpf_program__pin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path,
return 0;
}
+int bpf_program__unpin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path,
+ int instance)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (prog == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid program pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (instance < 0 || instance >= prog->instances.nr) {
+ pr_warning("invalid prog instance %d of prog %s (max %d)\n",
+ instance, prog->section_name, prog->instances.nr);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = unlink(path);
+ if (err != 0)
+ return -errno;
+ pr_debug("unpinned program '%s'\n", path);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int make_dir(const char *path)
{
char *cp, errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
@@ -1737,6 +1765,64 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
if (err)
return err;
+ for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%d", path, i);
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin;
+ }
+
+ err = bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_unpin;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_unpin:
+ for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%d", path, i);
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ }
+
+ rmdir(path);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
+{
+ int i, err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (prog == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid program pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (prog->instances.nr <= 0) {
+ pr_warning("no instances of prog %s to pin\n",
+ prog->section_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
char buf[PATH_MAX];
int len;
@@ -1747,11 +1833,15 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
- err = bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, buf, i);
+ err = bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, buf, i);
if (err)
return err;
}
+ err = rmdir(path);
+ if (err)
+ return -errno;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1776,6 +1866,28 @@ int bpf_map__pin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
}
pr_debug("pinned map '%s'\n", path);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf_map__unpin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = check_path(path);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (map == NULL) {
+ pr_warning("invalid map pointer\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ err = unlink(path);
+ if (err != 0)
+ return -errno;
+ pr_debug("unpinned map '%s'\n", path);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1803,14 +1915,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
bpf_map__name(map));
- if (len < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
- else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
+ }
err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_unpin_maps;
}
bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
@@ -1819,17 +1934,56 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
prog->section_name);
- if (len < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
- else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
- return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ if (len < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
+ } else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+ err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
+ }
err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_unpin_programs;
}
return 0;
+
+err_unpin_programs:
+ for (prog = bpf_program__prev(prog, obj);
+ prog != NULL;
+ prog = bpf_program__prev(prog, obj)) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+ prog->section_name);
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_program__unpin(prog, buf);
+ }
+
+err_unpin_maps:
+ for (map = bpf_map__prev(map, obj);
+ map != NULL;
+ map = bpf_map__prev(map, obj)) {
+ char buf[PATH_MAX];
+ int len;
+
+ len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+ bpf_map__name(map));
+ if (len < 0)
+ continue;
+ else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ bpf_map__unpin(map, buf);
+ }
+
+ return err;
}
void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
@@ -1918,23 +2072,20 @@ void *bpf_object__priv(struct bpf_object *obj)
}
static struct bpf_program *
-__bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+__bpf_program__iter(struct bpf_program *p, struct bpf_object *obj, int i)
{
- size_t idx;
+ ssize_t idx;
if (!obj->programs)
return NULL;
- /* First handler */
- if (prev == NULL)
- return &obj->programs[0];
- if (prev->obj != obj) {
+ if (p->obj != obj) {
pr_warning("error: program handler doesn't match object\n");
return NULL;
}
- idx = (prev - obj->programs) + 1;
- if (idx >= obj->nr_programs)
+ idx = (p - obj->programs) + i;
+ if (idx >= obj->nr_programs || idx < 0)
return NULL;
return &obj->programs[idx];
}
@@ -1944,8 +2095,29 @@ bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
{
struct bpf_program *prog = prev;
+ if (prev == NULL)
+ return obj->programs;
+
+ do {
+ prog = __bpf_program__iter(prog, obj, 1);
+ } while (prog && bpf_program__is_function_storage(prog, obj));
+
+ return prog;
+}
+
+struct bpf_program *
+bpf_program__prev(struct bpf_program *next, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ struct bpf_program *prog = next;
+
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ if (!obj->nr_programs)
+ return NULL;
+ return obj->programs + obj->nr_programs - 1;
+ }
+
do {
- prog = __bpf_program__next(prog, obj);
+ prog = __bpf_program__iter(prog, obj, -1);
} while (prog && bpf_program__is_function_storage(prog, obj));
return prog;
@@ -2272,10 +2444,10 @@ void bpf_map__set_ifindex(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 ifindex)
map->map_ifindex = ifindex;
}
-struct bpf_map *
-bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+static struct bpf_map *
+__bpf_map__iter(struct bpf_map *m, struct bpf_object *obj, int i)
{
- size_t idx;
+ ssize_t idx;
struct bpf_map *s, *e;
if (!obj || !obj->maps)
@@ -2284,21 +2456,39 @@ bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
s = obj->maps;
e = obj->maps + obj->nr_maps;
- if (prev == NULL)
- return s;
-
- if ((prev < s) || (prev >= e)) {
+ if ((m < s) || (m >= e)) {
pr_warning("error in %s: map handler doesn't belong to object\n",
__func__);
return NULL;
}
- idx = (prev - obj->maps) + 1;
- if (idx >= obj->nr_maps)
+ idx = (m - obj->maps) + i;
+ if (idx >= obj->nr_maps || idx < 0)
return NULL;
return &obj->maps[idx];
}
+struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *prev, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ if (prev == NULL)
+ return obj->maps;
+
+ return __bpf_map__iter(prev, obj, 1);
+}
+
+struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__prev(struct bpf_map *next, struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ if (!obj->nr_maps)
+ return NULL;
+ return obj->maps + obj->nr_maps - 1;
+ }
+
+ return __bpf_map__iter(next, obj, -1);
+}
+
struct bpf_map *
bpf_object__find_map_by_name(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *name)
{
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 1f3468dad8b2..785b27f761de 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ LIBBPF_API struct bpf_program *bpf_program__next(struct bpf_program *prog,
(pos) != NULL; \
(pos) = bpf_program__next((pos), (obj)))
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_program *bpf_program__prev(struct bpf_program *prog,
+ struct bpf_object *obj);
+
typedef void (*bpf_program_clear_priv_t)(struct bpf_program *,
void *);
@@ -131,7 +134,11 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__fd(struct bpf_program *prog);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__pin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog,
const char *path,
int instance);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__unpin_instance(struct bpf_program *prog,
+ const char *path,
+ int instance);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path);
LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__unload(struct bpf_program *prog);
struct bpf_insn;
@@ -260,6 +267,9 @@ bpf_map__next(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_object *obj);
(pos) != NULL; \
(pos) = bpf_map__next((pos), (obj)))
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_map *
+bpf_map__prev(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_object *obj);
+
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__fd(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API const struct bpf_map_def *bpf_map__def(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API const char *bpf_map__name(struct bpf_map *map);
@@ -274,6 +284,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__reuse_fd(struct bpf_map *map, int fd);
LIBBPF_API bool bpf_map__is_offload_neutral(struct bpf_map *map);
LIBBPF_API void bpf_map__set_ifindex(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 ifindex);
LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__pin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__unpin(struct bpf_map *map, const char *path);
LIBBPF_API long libbpf_get_error(const void *ptr);
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/4] libbpf: bpf_program__pin: add special case for instances.nr == 1
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah, jakub.kicinski,
quentin.monnet
Cc: guro, jiong.wang, sdf, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
When bpf_program has only one instance, don't create a subdirectory with
per-instance pin files (<prog>/0). Instead, just create a single pin file
for that single instance. This simplifies object pinning by not creating
unnecessary subdirectories.
This can potentially break existing users that depend on the case
where '/0' is always created. However, I couldn't find any serious
usage of bpf_program__pin inside the kernel tree and I suppose there
should be none outside.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index db84c85554e7..8407a880acbe 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1761,6 +1761,11 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (prog->instances.nr == 1) {
+ /* don't create subdirs when pinning single instance */
+ return bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, path, 0);
+ }
+
err = make_dir(path);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -1823,6 +1828,11 @@ int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (prog->instances.nr == 1) {
+ /* don't create subdirs when pinning single instance */
+ return bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, path, 0);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
char buf[PATH_MAX];
int len;
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/4] libbpf: bpf_program__pin: add special case for instances.nr == 1
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
When bpf_program has only one instance, don't create a subdirectory with
per-instance pin files (<prog>/0). Instead, just create a single pin file
for that single instance. This simplifies object pinning by not creating
unnecessary subdirectories.
This can potentially break existing users that depend on the case
where '/0' is always created. However, I couldn't find any serious
usage of bpf_program__pin inside the kernel tree and I suppose there
should be none outside.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index db84c85554e7..8407a880acbe 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1761,6 +1761,11 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (prog->instances.nr == 1) {
+ /* don't create subdirs when pinning single instance */
+ return bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, path, 0);
+ }
+
err = make_dir(path);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -1823,6 +1828,11 @@ int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (prog->instances.nr == 1) {
+ /* don't create subdirs when pinning single instance */
+ return bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, path, 0);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
char buf[PATH_MAX];
int len;
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/4] libbpf: bpf_program__pin: add special case for instances.nr == 1
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
When bpf_program has only one instance, don't create a subdirectory with
per-instance pin files (<prog>/0). Instead, just create a single pin file
for that single instance. This simplifies object pinning by not creating
unnecessary subdirectories.
This can potentially break existing users that depend on the case
where '/0' is always created. However, I couldn't find any serious
usage of bpf_program__pin inside the kernel tree and I suppose there
should be none outside.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index db84c85554e7..8407a880acbe 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1761,6 +1761,11 @@ int bpf_program__pin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (prog->instances.nr == 1) {
+ /* don't create subdirs when pinning single instance */
+ return bpf_program__pin_instance(prog, path, 0);
+ }
+
err = make_dir(path);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -1823,6 +1828,11 @@ int bpf_program__unpin(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *path)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (prog->instances.nr == 1) {
+ /* don't create subdirs when pinning single instance */
+ return bpf_program__unpin_instance(prog, path, 0);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++) {
char buf[PATH_MAX];
int len;
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah, jakub.kicinski,
quentin.monnet
Cc: guro, jiong.wang, sdf, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
* flow_dissector section with the main entry point
* a bunch of tail call progs
* a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
construct the jump table for the tail calls.
The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
case.
Example:
bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
/sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 0 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 1 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 2 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 3 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 4 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 5 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
.../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
*OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
*COMMANDS* :=
- { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
+ { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
+ | **loadall** | **help** }
MAP COMMANDS
=============
@@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
| **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
| **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
| **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
-| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
-| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
+| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
+| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
| **bpftool** **prog help**
|
| *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
@@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
| **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
| **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
| }
-| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
+| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
+| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
+| }
DESCRIPTION
@@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
extensions of *bpffs*.
- **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
+ **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
+ **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
+ from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
+ and programs from the *OBJ*.
**type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
inferred from section names.
By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
@@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
extensions of *bpffs*.
- **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
- Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
- to the map *MAP*.
-
- **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
- Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
- from the map *MAP*.
+ **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+ Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+ *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+ parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+ attached to current networking name space.
+
+ **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+ Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+ *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+ parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+ detached from the current networking name space.
**bpftool prog help**
Print short help message.
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
# Completion depends on object and command in use
case $object in
prog)
- if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
+ if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
case $prev in
id)
_bpftool_get_prog_ids
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
fi
if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
- COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
+ COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
return 0
fi
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
fi
return 0
;;
- load)
+ load|loadall)
local obj
if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
return fd;
}
-int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
{
char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
char *file;
char *dir;
int err = 0;
- err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
- if (!err)
- goto out;
-
file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
strcpy(file, name);
dir = dirname(file);
- if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
- p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
+ if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
+ /* nothing to do if already mounted */
goto out_free;
}
- /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
- if (!err) {
- err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
- if (err)
- p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
- strerror(errno));
- } else {
+ if (err) {
err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
name, err_str);
@@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
out_free:
free(file);
-out:
return err;
}
+int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
+}
+
int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
{
unsigned int id;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
[BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
+ [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
[__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
};
@@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
{
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
- int err, mapfd, progfd;
+ int err, progfd;
+ int mapfd = 0;
- if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
- p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for attach");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
p_err("invalid attach type");
return -EINVAL;
}
- NEXT_ARG();
+ if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+ NEXT_ARG();
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
- if (mapfd < 0)
- return mapfd;
+ mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+ if (mapfd < 0)
+ return mapfd;
+ }
err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
if (err) {
@@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
{
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
- int err, mapfd, progfd;
+ int err, progfd;
+ int mapfd = 0;
- if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
- p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for detach");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
p_err("invalid attach type");
return -EINVAL;
}
- NEXT_ARG();
+ if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+ NEXT_ARG();
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
- if (mapfd < 0)
- return mapfd;
+ mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+ if (mapfd < 0)
+ return mapfd;
+ }
err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
if (err) {
@@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
return 0;
}
-static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
+
+static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
{
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
};
struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
+ struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
- struct bpf_program *prog;
struct bpf_object *obj;
struct bpf_map *map;
const char *pinfile;
@@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_free_reuse_maps;
}
- prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
- if (!prog) {
- p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
- goto err_close_obj;
+ if (first_prog_only) {
+ prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
+ if (!prog) {
+ p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
}
- bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
+ if (!prog) {
+ p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+
const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
@@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_close_obj;
}
}
- bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
- bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
+
+ bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
+ bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
+ bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
+ bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
+ expected_attach_type);
+ }
qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
map_replace_compar);
@@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_close_obj;
}
- if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
+ err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
+ if (err)
goto err_close_obj;
+ if (prog) {
+ err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
+ if (err) {
+ p_err("failed to pin program %s",
+ bpf_program__title(prog, false));
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+ } else {
+ err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
+ if (err) {
+ p_err("failed to pin all programs");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+ }
+
if (json_output)
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
@@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
return -1;
}
+static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
+}
+
+static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
+}
+
static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
{
if (json_output) {
@@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
" %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
" %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
" %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
- " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
+ " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
+ " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
" [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
- " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
- " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
+ " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
+ " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
" %s %s help\n"
"\n"
" " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
@@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
" cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
" cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
" cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
- " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
+ " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
+ " flow_dissector }\n"
" " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
"",
bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
@@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
{ "dump", do_dump },
{ "pin", do_pin },
{ "load", do_load },
+ { "loadall", do_loadall },
{ "attach", do_attach },
{ "detach", do_detach },
{ 0 }
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
* flow_dissector section with the main entry point
* a bunch of tail call progs
* a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
construct the jump table for the tail calls.
The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
case.
Example:
bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
/sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 0 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 1 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 2 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 3 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 4 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 5 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
.../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
*OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
*COMMANDS* :=
- { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
+ { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
+ | **loadall** | **help** }
MAP COMMANDS
=============
@@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
| **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
| **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
| **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
-| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
-| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
+| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
+| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
| **bpftool** **prog help**
|
| *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
@@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
| **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
| **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
| }
-| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
+| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
+| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
+| }
DESCRIPTION
@@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
extensions of *bpffs*.
- **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
+ **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
+ **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
+ from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
+ and programs from the *OBJ*.
**type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
inferred from section names.
By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
@@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
extensions of *bpffs*.
- **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
- Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
- to the map *MAP*.
-
- **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
- Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
- from the map *MAP*.
+ **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+ Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+ *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+ parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+ attached to current networking name space.
+
+ **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+ Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+ *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+ parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+ detached from the current networking name space.
**bpftool prog help**
Print short help message.
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
# Completion depends on object and command in use
case $object in
prog)
- if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
+ if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
case $prev in
id)
_bpftool_get_prog_ids
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
fi
if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
- COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
+ COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
return 0
fi
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
fi
return 0
;;
- load)
+ load|loadall)
local obj
if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
return fd;
}
-int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
{
char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
char *file;
char *dir;
int err = 0;
- err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
- if (!err)
- goto out;
-
file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
strcpy(file, name);
dir = dirname(file);
- if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
- p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
+ if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
+ /* nothing to do if already mounted */
goto out_free;
}
- /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
- if (!err) {
- err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
- if (err)
- p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
- strerror(errno));
- } else {
+ if (err) {
err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
name, err_str);
@@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
out_free:
free(file);
-out:
return err;
}
+int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
+}
+
int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
{
unsigned int id;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
[BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
+ [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
[__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
};
@@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
{
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
- int err, mapfd, progfd;
+ int err, progfd;
+ int mapfd = 0;
- if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
- p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for attach");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
p_err("invalid attach type");
return -EINVAL;
}
- NEXT_ARG();
+ if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+ NEXT_ARG();
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
- if (mapfd < 0)
- return mapfd;
+ mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+ if (mapfd < 0)
+ return mapfd;
+ }
err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
if (err) {
@@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
{
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
- int err, mapfd, progfd;
+ int err, progfd;
+ int mapfd = 0;
- if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
- p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for detach");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
p_err("invalid attach type");
return -EINVAL;
}
- NEXT_ARG();
+ if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+ NEXT_ARG();
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
- if (mapfd < 0)
- return mapfd;
+ mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+ if (mapfd < 0)
+ return mapfd;
+ }
err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
if (err) {
@@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
return 0;
}
-static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
+
+static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
{
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
};
struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
+ struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
- struct bpf_program *prog;
struct bpf_object *obj;
struct bpf_map *map;
const char *pinfile;
@@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_free_reuse_maps;
}
- prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
- if (!prog) {
- p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
- goto err_close_obj;
+ if (first_prog_only) {
+ prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
+ if (!prog) {
+ p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
}
- bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
+ if (!prog) {
+ p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+
const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
@@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_close_obj;
}
}
- bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
- bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
+
+ bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
+ bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
+ bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
+ bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
+ expected_attach_type);
+ }
qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
map_replace_compar);
@@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_close_obj;
}
- if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
+ err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
+ if (err)
goto err_close_obj;
+ if (prog) {
+ err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
+ if (err) {
+ p_err("failed to pin program %s",
+ bpf_program__title(prog, false));
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+ } else {
+ err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
+ if (err) {
+ p_err("failed to pin all programs");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+ }
+
if (json_output)
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
@@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
return -1;
}
+static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
+}
+
+static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
+}
+
static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
{
if (json_output) {
@@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
" %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
" %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
" %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
- " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
+ " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
+ " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
" [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
- " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
- " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
+ " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
+ " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
" %s %s help\n"
"\n"
" " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
@@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
" cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
" cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
" cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
- " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
+ " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
+ " flow_dissector }\n"
" " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
"",
bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
@@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
{ "dump", do_dump },
{ "pin", do_pin },
{ "load", do_load },
+ { "loadall", do_loadall },
{ "attach", do_attach },
{ "detach", do_detach },
{ 0 }
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
* flow_dissector section with the main entry point
* a bunch of tail call progs
* a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
construct the jump table for the tail calls.
The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
case.
Example:
bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
/sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 0 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 1 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 2 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 3 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 4 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
key 5 0 0 0 \
value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
.../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
*OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
*COMMANDS* :=
- { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
+ { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
+ | **loadall** | **help** }
MAP COMMANDS
=============
@@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
| **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
| **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
| **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
-| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
-| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
+| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
+| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
| **bpftool** **prog help**
|
| *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
@@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
| **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
| **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
| }
-| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
+| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
+| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
+| }
DESCRIPTION
@@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
extensions of *bpffs*.
- **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
+ **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
+ **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
+ from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
+ and programs from the *OBJ*.
**type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
inferred from section names.
By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
@@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
extensions of *bpffs*.
- **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
- Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
- to the map *MAP*.
-
- **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
- Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
- from the map *MAP*.
+ **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+ Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+ *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+ parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+ attached to current networking name space.
+
+ **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+ Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+ *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+ parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+ detached from the current networking name space.
**bpftool prog help**
Print short help message.
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
# Completion depends on object and command in use
case $object in
prog)
- if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
+ if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
case $prev in
id)
_bpftool_get_prog_ids
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
fi
if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
- COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
+ COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
return 0
fi
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
fi
return 0
;;
- load)
+ load|loadall)
local obj
if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
return fd;
}
-int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
{
char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
char *file;
char *dir;
int err = 0;
- err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
- if (!err)
- goto out;
-
file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
strcpy(file, name);
dir = dirname(file);
- if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
- p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
+ if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
+ /* nothing to do if already mounted */
goto out_free;
}
- /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
- if (!err) {
- err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
- if (err)
- p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
- strerror(errno));
- } else {
+ if (err) {
err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
name, err_str);
@@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
out_free:
free(file);
-out:
return err;
}
+int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
+}
+
int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
{
unsigned int id;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
[BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
+ [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
[__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
};
@@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
{
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
- int err, mapfd, progfd;
+ int err, progfd;
+ int mapfd = 0;
- if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
- p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for attach");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
p_err("invalid attach type");
return -EINVAL;
}
- NEXT_ARG();
+ if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+ NEXT_ARG();
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
- if (mapfd < 0)
- return mapfd;
+ mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+ if (mapfd < 0)
+ return mapfd;
+ }
err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
if (err) {
@@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
{
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
- int err, mapfd, progfd;
+ int err, progfd;
+ int mapfd = 0;
- if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
- p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for detach");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
p_err("invalid attach type");
return -EINVAL;
}
- NEXT_ARG();
+ if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+ NEXT_ARG();
+ if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+ p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
- if (mapfd < 0)
- return mapfd;
+ mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+ if (mapfd < 0)
+ return mapfd;
+ }
err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
if (err) {
@@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
return 0;
}
-static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
+
+static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
{
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
};
struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
+ struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
- struct bpf_program *prog;
struct bpf_object *obj;
struct bpf_map *map;
const char *pinfile;
@@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_free_reuse_maps;
}
- prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
- if (!prog) {
- p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
- goto err_close_obj;
+ if (first_prog_only) {
+ prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
+ if (!prog) {
+ p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
}
- bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
+ if (!prog) {
+ p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+
const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
@@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_close_obj;
}
}
- bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
- bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
+
+ bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
+ bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
+ bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
+ bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
+ expected_attach_type);
+ }
qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
map_replace_compar);
@@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_close_obj;
}
- if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
+ err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
+ if (err)
goto err_close_obj;
+ if (prog) {
+ err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
+ if (err) {
+ p_err("failed to pin program %s",
+ bpf_program__title(prog, false));
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+ } else {
+ err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
+ if (err) {
+ p_err("failed to pin all programs");
+ goto err_close_obj;
+ }
+ }
+
if (json_output)
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
@@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
return -1;
}
+static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
+}
+
+static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
+}
+
static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
{
if (json_output) {
@@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
" %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
" %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
" %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
- " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
+ " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
+ " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
" [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
- " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
- " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
+ " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
+ " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
" %s %s help\n"
"\n"
" " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
@@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
" cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
" cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
" cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
- " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
+ " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
+ " flow_dissector }\n"
" " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
"",
bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
@@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
{ "dump", do_dump },
{ "pin", do_pin },
{ "load", do_load },
+ { "loadall", do_loadall },
{ "attach", do_attach },
{ "detach", do_detach },
{ 0 }
--
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 11:16 ` quentin.monnet
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2018-11-08 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah,
jakub.kicinski
Cc: guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>
> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> * a bunch of tail call progs
> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>
> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
>
> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> case.
>
> Example:
> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 0 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 1 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 2 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 3 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 4 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 5 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
>
> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
>
> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> ---
> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
>
> *COMMANDS* :=
> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> + | **loadall** | **help** }
>
> MAP COMMANDS
> =============
> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> | **bpftool** **prog help**
> |
> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> | }
> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> +| }
>
>
> DESCRIPTION
> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> extensions of *bpffs*.
>
> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think
we also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only
the case with "loadall"
> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> inferred from section names.
> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> extensions of *bpffs*.
>
> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> - to the map *MAP*.
> -
> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> - from the map *MAP*.
> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> + attached to current networking name space.
> +
> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> + detached from the current networking name space.
While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
>
> **bpftool prog help**
> Print short help message.
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> # Completion depends on object and command in use
> case $object in
> prog)
> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> case $prev in
> id)
> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> fi
>
> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> return 0
> fi
>
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> fi
> return 0
> ;;
> - load)
> + load|loadall)
> local obj
>
> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or
so. Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> return fd;
> }
>
> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> {
> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> char *file;
> char *dir;
> int err = 0;
>
> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> strcpy(file, name);
> dir = dirname(file);
>
> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> goto out_free;
> }
Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
>
> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> - if (!err) {
> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> - if (err)
> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> - strerror(errno));
> - } else {
> + if (err) {
> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> name, err_str);
> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>
> out_free:
> free(file);
> -out:
> return err;
> }
>
> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> +}
> +
> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> {
> unsigned int id;
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> };
>
> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> + int err, progfd;
> + int mapfd = 0;
>
> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> p_err("invalid attach type");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - NEXT_ARG();
> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> + NEXT_ARG();
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> - if (mapfd < 0)
> - return mapfd;
> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> + if (mapfd < 0)
> + return mapfd;
> + }
>
> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> if (err) {
> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> + int err, progfd;
> + int mapfd = 0;
>
> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> p_err("invalid attach type");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - NEXT_ARG();
> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> + NEXT_ARG();
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for
do_attach() and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the
number of attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have
other attach types that do not take maps in the future.
>
> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> - if (mapfd < 0)
> - return mapfd;
> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> + if (mapfd < 0)
> + return mapfd;
> + }
>
> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> if (err) {
> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> return 0;
> }
> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> +
> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> };
> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> - struct bpf_program *prog;
> struct bpf_object *obj;
> struct bpf_map *map;
> const char *pinfile;
> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> }
>
> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> - if (!prog) {
> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> - goto err_close_obj;
> + if (first_prog_only) {
> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> + if (!prog) {
> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> }
>
> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> + if (!prog) {
> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> +
> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
>
> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_close_obj;
> }
> }
> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> +
> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> + expected_attach_type);
> + }
I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
that type for all programs instead.
>
> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> map_replace_compar);
> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_close_obj;
> }
>
> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> + if (err)
> goto err_close_obj;
>
> + if (prog) {
Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly,
at this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make
it easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> + err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
> + if (err) {
> + p_err("failed to pin program %s",
> + bpf_program__title(prog, false));
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> + } else {
> + err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
> + if (err) {
> + p_err("failed to pin all programs");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (json_output)
> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
>
> @@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
> +}
> +
> static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> if (json_output) {
> @@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> " %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
> " %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
> " %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
> - " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> + " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
> + " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> " [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
> - " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> - " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> + " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> + " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> " %s %s help\n"
> "\n"
> " " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
> @@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> " cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
> " cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
> " cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
> - " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
> + " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
> + " flow_dissector }\n"
> " " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
> "",
> bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
> @@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
> { "dump", do_dump },
> { "pin", do_pin },
> { "load", do_load },
> + { "loadall", do_loadall },
> { "attach", do_attach },
> { "detach", do_detach },
> { 0 }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 11:16 ` quentin.monnet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: quentin.monnet @ 2018-11-08 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>
> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> * a bunch of tail call progs
> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>
> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
>
> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> case.
>
> Example:
> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 0 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 1 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 2 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 3 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 4 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 5 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
>
> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
>
> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> ---
> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
>
> *COMMANDS* :=
> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> + | **loadall** | **help** }
>
> MAP COMMANDS
> =============
> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> | **bpftool** **prog help**
> |
> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> | }
> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> +| }
>
>
> DESCRIPTION
> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> extensions of *bpffs*.
>
> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think
we also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only
the case with "loadall"
> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> inferred from section names.
> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> extensions of *bpffs*.
>
> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> - to the map *MAP*.
> -
> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> - from the map *MAP*.
> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> + attached to current networking name space.
> +
> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> + detached from the current networking name space.
While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
>
> **bpftool prog help**
> Print short help message.
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> # Completion depends on object and command in use
> case $object in
> prog)
> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> case $prev in
> id)
> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> fi
>
> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> return 0
> fi
>
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> fi
> return 0
> ;;
> - load)
> + load|loadall)
> local obj
>
> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or
so. Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> return fd;
> }
>
> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> {
> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> char *file;
> char *dir;
> int err = 0;
>
> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> strcpy(file, name);
> dir = dirname(file);
>
> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> goto out_free;
> }
Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
>
> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> - if (!err) {
> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> - if (err)
> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> - strerror(errno));
> - } else {
> + if (err) {
> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> name, err_str);
> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>
> out_free:
> free(file);
> -out:
> return err;
> }
>
> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> +}
> +
> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> {
> unsigned int id;
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> };
>
> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> + int err, progfd;
> + int mapfd = 0;
>
> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> p_err("invalid attach type");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - NEXT_ARG();
> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> + NEXT_ARG();
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> - if (mapfd < 0)
> - return mapfd;
> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> + if (mapfd < 0)
> + return mapfd;
> + }
>
> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> if (err) {
> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> + int err, progfd;
> + int mapfd = 0;
>
> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> p_err("invalid attach type");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - NEXT_ARG();
> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> + NEXT_ARG();
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for
do_attach() and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the
number of attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have
other attach types that do not take maps in the future.
>
> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> - if (mapfd < 0)
> - return mapfd;
> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> + if (mapfd < 0)
> + return mapfd;
> + }
>
> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> if (err) {
> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> return 0;
> }
> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> +
> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> };
> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> - struct bpf_program *prog;
> struct bpf_object *obj;
> struct bpf_map *map;
> const char *pinfile;
> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> }
>
> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> - if (!prog) {
> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> - goto err_close_obj;
> + if (first_prog_only) {
> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> + if (!prog) {
> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> }
>
> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> + if (!prog) {
> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> +
> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
>
> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_close_obj;
> }
> }
> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> +
> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> + expected_attach_type);
> + }
I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
that type for all programs instead.
>
> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> map_replace_compar);
> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_close_obj;
> }
>
> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> + if (err)
> goto err_close_obj;
>
> + if (prog) {
Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly,
at this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make
it easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> + err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
> + if (err) {
> + p_err("failed to pin program %s",
> + bpf_program__title(prog, false));
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> + } else {
> + err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
> + if (err) {
> + p_err("failed to pin all programs");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (json_output)
> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
>
> @@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
> +}
> +
> static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> if (json_output) {
> @@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> " %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
> " %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
> " %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
> - " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> + " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
> + " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> " [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
> - " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> - " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> + " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> + " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> " %s %s help\n"
> "\n"
> " " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
> @@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> " cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
> " cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
> " cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
> - " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
> + " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
> + " flow_dissector }\n"
> " " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
> "",
> bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
> @@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
> { "dump", do_dump },
> { "pin", do_pin },
> { "load", do_load },
> + { "loadall", do_loadall },
> { "attach", do_attach },
> { "detach", do_detach },
> { 0 }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 11:16 ` quentin.monnet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2018-11-08 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>
> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> * a bunch of tail call progs
> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>
> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
>
> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> case.
>
> Example:
> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 0 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 1 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 2 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 3 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 4 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
>
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> key 5 0 0 0 \
> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
>
> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
>
> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> ---
> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
>
> *COMMANDS* :=
> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> + | **loadall** | **help** }
>
> MAP COMMANDS
> =============
> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> | **bpftool** **prog help**
> |
> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> | }
> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> +| }
>
>
> DESCRIPTION
> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> extensions of *bpffs*.
>
> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think
we also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only
the case with "loadall"
> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> inferred from section names.
> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> extensions of *bpffs*.
>
> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> - to the map *MAP*.
> -
> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> - from the map *MAP*.
> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> + attached to current networking name space.
> +
> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> + detached from the current networking name space.
While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
>
> **bpftool prog help**
> Print short help message.
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> # Completion depends on object and command in use
> case $object in
> prog)
> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> case $prev in
> id)
> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> fi
>
> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> return 0
> fi
>
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> fi
> return 0
> ;;
> - load)
> + load|loadall)
> local obj
>
> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or
so. Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> return fd;
> }
>
> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> {
> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> char *file;
> char *dir;
> int err = 0;
>
> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out;
> -
> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> strcpy(file, name);
> dir = dirname(file);
>
> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> goto out_free;
> }
Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
>
> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> - if (!err) {
> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> - if (err)
> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> - strerror(errno));
> - } else {
> + if (err) {
> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> name, err_str);
> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>
> out_free:
> free(file);
> -out:
> return err;
> }
>
> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> +}
> +
> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> {
> unsigned int id;
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> };
>
> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> + int err, progfd;
> + int mapfd = 0;
>
> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> p_err("invalid attach type");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - NEXT_ARG();
> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> + NEXT_ARG();
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> - if (mapfd < 0)
> - return mapfd;
> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> + if (mapfd < 0)
> + return mapfd;
> + }
>
> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> if (err) {
> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> + int err, progfd;
> + int mapfd = 0;
>
> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> p_err("invalid attach type");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - NEXT_ARG();
> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> + NEXT_ARG();
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for
do_attach() and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the
number of attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have
other attach types that do not take maps in the future.
>
> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> - if (mapfd < 0)
> - return mapfd;
> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> + if (mapfd < 0)
> + return mapfd;
> + }
>
> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> if (err) {
> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> return 0;
> }
> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> +
> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> {
> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> };
> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> - struct bpf_program *prog;
> struct bpf_object *obj;
> struct bpf_map *map;
> const char *pinfile;
> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> }
>
> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> - if (!prog) {
> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> - goto err_close_obj;
> + if (first_prog_only) {
> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> + if (!prog) {
> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> }
>
> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> + if (!prog) {
> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> +
> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
>
> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_close_obj;
> }
> }
> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> +
> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> + expected_attach_type);
> + }
I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
that type for all programs instead.
>
> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> map_replace_compar);
> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> goto err_close_obj;
> }
>
> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> + if (err)
> goto err_close_obj;
>
> + if (prog) {
Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly,
at this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make
it easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> + err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
> + if (err) {
> + p_err("failed to pin program %s",
> + bpf_program__title(prog, false));
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> + } else {
> + err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
> + if (err) {
> + p_err("failed to pin all programs");
> + goto err_close_obj;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (json_output)
> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
>
> @@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
> +}
> +
> static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> if (json_output) {
> @@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> " %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
> " %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
> " %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
> - " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> + " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
> + " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> " [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
> - " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> - " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> + " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> + " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> " %s %s help\n"
> "\n"
> " " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
> @@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> " cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
> " cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
> " cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
> - " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
> + " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
> + " flow_dissector }\n"
> " " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
> "",
> bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
> @@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
> { "dump", do_dump },
> { "pin", do_pin },
> { "load", do_load },
> + { "loadall", do_loadall },
> { "attach", do_attach },
> { "detach", do_detach },
> { 0 }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 11:16 ` quentin.monnet
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 18:01 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Quentin Monnet
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah,
jakub.kicinski, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
Thank you for another round of review!
> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >
> > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >
> > When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> > first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> > passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> > construct the jump table for the tail calls.
> >
> > The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> > case.
> >
> > Example:
> > bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> > /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 0 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 1 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 2 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 3 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 4 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 5 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
> >
> > bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
> >
> > Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> > the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > ---
> > .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> > 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> > *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
> > *COMMANDS* :=
> > - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> > + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> > + | **loadall** | **help** }
> > MAP COMMANDS
> > =============
> > @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> > | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> > | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> > | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> > -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > | **bpftool** **prog help**
> > |
> > | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> > @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> > | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> > | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> > | }
> > -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> > +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> > +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> > +| }
> > DESCRIPTION
> > @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > extensions of *bpffs*.
> > - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > + and programs from the *OBJ*.
>
> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> case with "loadall"
I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
pin the maps?
> > **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> > inferred from section names.
> > By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> > @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > extensions of *bpffs*.
> > - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> > - to the map *MAP*.
> > -
> > - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> > - from the map *MAP*.
> > + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> > + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> > + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> > + attached to current networking name space.
> > +
> > + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> > + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> > + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> > + detached from the current networking name space.
>
> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
> > **bpftool prog help**
> > Print short help message.
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > # Completion depends on object and command in use
> > case $object in
> > prog)
> > - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> > + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> > case $prev in
> > id)
> > _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > fi
> > if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> > - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> > + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> > return 0
> > fi
> > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > fi
> > return 0
> > ;;
> > - load)
> > + load|loadall)
> > local obj
> > if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
>
> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
Will do, thanks!
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> > return fd;
> > }
> > -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> > {
> > char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> > char *file;
> > char *dir;
> > int err = 0;
> > - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > - if (!err)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> > strcpy(file, name);
> > dir = dirname(file);
> > - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> > - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> > + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> > + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> > goto out_free;
> > }
>
> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
Ack.
> > - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> > err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> > - if (!err) {
> > - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > - if (err)
> > - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> > - strerror(errno));
> > - } else {
> > + if (err) {
> > err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> > p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> > name, err_str);
> > @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > out_free:
> > free(file);
> > -out:
> > return err;
> > }
> > +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > +}
> > +
> > int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> > {
> > unsigned int id;
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> > char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> > int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> > int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> > +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> > int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> > int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> > [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> > [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> > [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> > + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> > [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> > };
> > @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> > static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> > - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> > + int err, progfd;
> > + int mapfd = 0;
> > - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> > - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > p_err("invalid attach type");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> > + NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > - if (mapfd < 0)
> > - return mapfd;
> > + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > + if (mapfd < 0)
> > + return mapfd;
> > + }
> > err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> > if (err) {
> > @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> > - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> > + int err, progfd;
> > + int mapfd = 0;
> > - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> > - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > p_err("invalid attach type");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> > + NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
> types that do not take maps in the future.
I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
do_attach and do_detach.
> > - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > - if (mapfd < 0)
> > - return mapfd;
> > + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > + if (mapfd < 0)
> > + return mapfd;
> > + }
> > err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> > if (err) {
> > @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > +
> > +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> > struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> > .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> > };
> > struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> > + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> > unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> > - struct bpf_program *prog;
> > struct bpf_object *obj;
> > struct bpf_map *map;
> > const char *pinfile;
> > @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> > }
> > - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> > - if (!prog) {
> > - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> > - goto err_close_obj;
> > + if (first_prog_only) {
> > + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > +
> > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > +
> > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > + expected_attach_type);
> > + }
>
> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
> instead.
I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
something like that?
Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
> > qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> > map_replace_compar);
> > @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> > + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> > + if (err)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > + if (prog) {
>
> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
preference.
> > + err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
> > + if (err) {
> > + p_err("failed to pin program %s",
> > + bpf_program__title(prog, false));
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
> > + if (err) {
> > + p_err("failed to pin all programs");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > if (json_output)
> > jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> > @@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > return -1;
> > }
> > +static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > if (json_output) {
> > @@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > " %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
> > " %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
> > " %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
> > - " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> > + " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
> > + " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> > " [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
> > - " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> > - " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> > + " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> > + " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> > " %s %s help\n"
> > "\n"
> > " " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
> > @@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > " cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
> > " cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
> > " cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
> > - " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
> > + " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
> > + " flow_dissector }\n"
> > " " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
> > "",
> > bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
> > @@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
> > { "dump", do_dump },
> > { "pin", do_pin },
> > { "load", do_load },
> > + { "loadall", do_loadall },
> > { "attach", do_attach },
> > { "detach", do_detach },
> > { 0 }
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 18:01 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
Thank you for another round of review!
> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >
> > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >
> > When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> > first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> > passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> > construct the jump table for the tail calls.
> >
> > The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> > case.
> >
> > Example:
> > bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> > /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 0 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 1 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 2 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 3 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 4 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 5 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
> >
> > bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
> >
> > Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> > the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> > ---
> > .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> > 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> > *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
> > *COMMANDS* :=
> > - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> > + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> > + | **loadall** | **help** }
> > MAP COMMANDS
> > =============
> > @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> > | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> > | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> > | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> > -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > | **bpftool** **prog help**
> > |
> > | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> > @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> > | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> > | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> > | }
> > -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> > +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> > +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> > +| }
> > DESCRIPTION
> > @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > extensions of *bpffs*.
> > - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > + and programs from the *OBJ*.
>
> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> case with "loadall"
I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
pin the maps?
> > **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> > inferred from section names.
> > By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> > @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > extensions of *bpffs*.
> > - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> > - to the map *MAP*.
> > -
> > - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> > - from the map *MAP*.
> > + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> > + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> > + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> > + attached to current networking name space.
> > +
> > + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> > + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> > + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> > + detached from the current networking name space.
>
> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
> > **bpftool prog help**
> > Print short help message.
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > # Completion depends on object and command in use
> > case $object in
> > prog)
> > - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> > + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> > case $prev in
> > id)
> > _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > fi
> > if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> > - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> > + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> > return 0
> > fi
> > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > fi
> > return 0
> > ;;
> > - load)
> > + load|loadall)
> > local obj
> > if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
>
> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
Will do, thanks!
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> > return fd;
> > }
> > -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> > {
> > char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> > char *file;
> > char *dir;
> > int err = 0;
> > - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > - if (!err)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> > strcpy(file, name);
> > dir = dirname(file);
> > - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> > - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> > + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> > + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> > goto out_free;
> > }
>
> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
Ack.
> > - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> > err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> > - if (!err) {
> > - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > - if (err)
> > - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> > - strerror(errno));
> > - } else {
> > + if (err) {
> > err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> > p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> > name, err_str);
> > @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > out_free:
> > free(file);
> > -out:
> > return err;
> > }
> > +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > +}
> > +
> > int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> > {
> > unsigned int id;
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> > char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> > int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> > int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> > +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> > int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> > int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> > [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> > [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> > [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> > + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> > [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> > };
> > @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> > static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> > - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> > + int err, progfd;
> > + int mapfd = 0;
> > - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> > - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > p_err("invalid attach type");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> > + NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > - if (mapfd < 0)
> > - return mapfd;
> > + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > + if (mapfd < 0)
> > + return mapfd;
> > + }
> > err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> > if (err) {
> > @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> > - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> > + int err, progfd;
> > + int mapfd = 0;
> > - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> > - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > p_err("invalid attach type");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> > + NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
> types that do not take maps in the future.
I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
do_attach and do_detach.
> > - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > - if (mapfd < 0)
> > - return mapfd;
> > + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > + if (mapfd < 0)
> > + return mapfd;
> > + }
> > err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> > if (err) {
> > @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > +
> > +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> > struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> > .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> > };
> > struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> > + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> > unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> > - struct bpf_program *prog;
> > struct bpf_object *obj;
> > struct bpf_map *map;
> > const char *pinfile;
> > @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> > }
> > - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> > - if (!prog) {
> > - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> > - goto err_close_obj;
> > + if (first_prog_only) {
> > + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > +
> > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > +
> > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > + expected_attach_type);
> > + }
>
> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
> instead.
I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
something like that?
Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
> > qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> > map_replace_compar);
> > @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> > + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> > + if (err)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > + if (prog) {
>
> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
preference.
> > + err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
> > + if (err) {
> > + p_err("failed to pin program %s",
> > + bpf_program__title(prog, false));
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
> > + if (err) {
> > + p_err("failed to pin all programs");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > if (json_output)
> > jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> > @@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > return -1;
> > }
> > +static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > if (json_output) {
> > @@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > " %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
> > " %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
> > " %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
> > - " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> > + " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
> > + " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> > " [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
> > - " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> > - " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> > + " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> > + " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> > " %s %s help\n"
> > "\n"
> > " " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
> > @@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > " cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
> > " cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
> > " cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
> > - " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
> > + " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
> > + " flow_dissector }\n"
> > " " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
> > "",
> > bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
> > @@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
> > { "dump", do_dump },
> > { "pin", do_pin },
> > { "load", do_load },
> > + { "loadall", do_loadall },
> > { "attach", do_attach },
> > { "detach", do_detach },
> > { 0 }
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 18:01 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
Thank you for another round of review!
> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >
> > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >
> > When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> > first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> > passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> > construct the jump table for the tail calls.
> >
> > The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> > case.
> >
> > Example:
> > bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> > /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 0 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 1 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 2 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 3 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 4 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
> >
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > key 5 0 0 0 \
> > value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
> >
> > bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
> >
> > Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> > the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> > ---
> > .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> > 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> > *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
> > *COMMANDS* :=
> > - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> > + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> > + | **loadall** | **help** }
> > MAP COMMANDS
> > =============
> > @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> > | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> > | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> > | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> > -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > | **bpftool** **prog help**
> > |
> > | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> > @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> > | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> > | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> > | }
> > -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> > +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> > +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> > +| }
> > DESCRIPTION
> > @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > extensions of *bpffs*.
> > - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > + and programs from the *OBJ*.
>
> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> case with "loadall"
I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
pin the maps?
> > **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> > inferred from section names.
> > By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> > @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > extensions of *bpffs*.
> > - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> > - to the map *MAP*.
> > -
> > - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> > - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> > - from the map *MAP*.
> > + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> > + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> > + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> > + attached to current networking name space.
> > +
> > + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> > + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> > + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> > + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> > + detached from the current networking name space.
>
> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
> > **bpftool prog help**
> > Print short help message.
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> > @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > # Completion depends on object and command in use
> > case $object in
> > prog)
> > - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> > + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> > case $prev in
> > id)
> > _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > fi
> > if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> > - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> > + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> > return 0
> > fi
> > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> > fi
> > return 0
> > ;;
> > - load)
> > + load|loadall)
> > local obj
> > if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
>
> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
Will do, thanks!
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> > @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> > return fd;
> > }
> > -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> > {
> > char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> > char *file;
> > char *dir;
> > int err = 0;
> > - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > - if (!err)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> > strcpy(file, name);
> > dir = dirname(file);
> > - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> > - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> > + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> > + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> > goto out_free;
> > }
>
> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
Ack.
> > - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> > err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> > - if (!err) {
> > - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > - if (err)
> > - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> > - strerror(errno));
> > - } else {
> > + if (err) {
> > err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> > p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> > name, err_str);
> > @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > out_free:
> > free(file);
> > -out:
> > return err;
> > }
> > +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> > +}
> > +
> > int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> > {
> > unsigned int id;
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> > char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> > int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> > int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> > +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> > int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> > int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> > [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> > [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> > [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> > + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> > [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> > };
> > @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> > static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> > - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> > + int err, progfd;
> > + int mapfd = 0;
> > - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> > - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > p_err("invalid attach type");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> > + NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > - if (mapfd < 0)
> > - return mapfd;
> > + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > + if (mapfd < 0)
> > + return mapfd;
> > + }
> > err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> > if (err) {
> > @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> > - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> > + int err, progfd;
> > + int mapfd = 0;
> > - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> > - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > p_err("invalid attach type");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> > + NEXT_ARG();
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> > + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
> types that do not take maps in the future.
I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
do_attach and do_detach.
> > - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > - if (mapfd < 0)
> > - return mapfd;
> > + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> > + if (mapfd < 0)
> > + return mapfd;
> > + }
> > err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> > if (err) {
> > @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > +
> > +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> > struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> > .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> > };
> > struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> > + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> > unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> > - struct bpf_program *prog;
> > struct bpf_object *obj;
> > struct bpf_map *map;
> > const char *pinfile;
> > @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> > }
> > - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> > - if (!prog) {
> > - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> > - goto err_close_obj;
> > + if (first_prog_only) {
> > + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > +
> > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > +
> > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > + expected_attach_type);
> > + }
>
> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
> instead.
I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
something like that?
Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
> > qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> > map_replace_compar);
> > @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> > + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> > + if (err)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > + if (prog) {
>
> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
preference.
> > + err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
> > + if (err) {
> > + p_err("failed to pin program %s",
> > + bpf_program__title(prog, false));
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
> > + if (err) {
> > + p_err("failed to pin all programs");
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > if (json_output)
> > jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> > @@ -1023,6 +1066,16 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > return -1;
> > }
> > +static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + return load_with_options(argc, argv, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int do_loadall(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + return load_with_options(argc, argv, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > if (json_output) {
> > @@ -1035,10 +1088,11 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > " %s %s dump xlated PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes | visual }]\n"
> > " %s %s dump jited PROG [{ file FILE | opcodes }]\n"
> > " %s %s pin PROG FILE\n"
> > - " %s %s load OBJ FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> > + " %s %s { load | loadall } OBJ FILE \\\n"
> > + " [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
> > " [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
> > - " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> > - " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
> > + " %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> > + " %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
> > " %s %s help\n"
> > "\n"
> > " " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
> > @@ -1050,7 +1104,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
> > " cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
> > " cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
> > " cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
> > - " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
> > + " ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
> > + " flow_dissector }\n"
> > " " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
> > "",
> > bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
> > @@ -1067,6 +1122,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
> > { "dump", do_dump },
> > { "pin", do_pin },
> > { "load", do_load },
> > + { "loadall", do_loadall },
> > { "attach", do_attach },
> > { "detach", do_detach },
> > { 0 }
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 18:01 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 18:21 ` quentin.monnet
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2018-11-08 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah,
jakub.kicinski, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 19076 bytes --]
2018-11-08 10:01 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
> On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
> Thank you for another round of review!
>
>> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
>>> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
>>> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
>>> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>>>
>>> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
>>> * a bunch of tail call progs
>>> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>>>
>>> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
>>> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
>>> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
>>> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
>>>
>>> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
>>> case.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
>>> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 0 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 1 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 2 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 3 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 4 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 5 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
>>>
>>> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
>>>
>>> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
>>> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
>>> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
>>> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
>>> *COMMANDS* :=
>>> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
>>> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
>>> + | **loadall** | **help** }
>>> MAP COMMANDS
>>> =============
>>> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
>>> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog help**
>>> |
>>> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
>>> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
>>> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
>>> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
>>> | }
>>> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
>>> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
>>> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
>>> +| }
>>> DESCRIPTION
>>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
>>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
>>> extensions of *bpffs*.
>>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
>>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
>>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
>>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
>>
>> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
>> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
>> case with "loadall"
> I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> pin the maps?
>
My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
sorry about that.
>>> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
>>> inferred from section names.
>>> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
>>> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
>>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
>>> extensions of *bpffs*.
>>> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
>>> - to the map *MAP*.
>>> -
>>> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
>>> - from the map *MAP*.
>>> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
>>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
>>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
>>> + attached to current networking name space.
>>> +
>>> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
>>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
>>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
>>> + detached from the current networking name space.
>>
>> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
>> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
> Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
Those paragraphs were using spaces already, so you didn't introduce that
:). But all others use tabs so its a good occasion to fix it.
>>> **bpftool prog help**
>>> Print short help message.
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> # Completion depends on object and command in use
>>> case $object in
>>> prog)
>>> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
>>> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
>>> case $prev in
>>> id)
>>> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
>>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> fi
>>> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
>>> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
>>> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
>>> return 0
>>> fi
>>> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> fi
>>> return 0
>>> ;;
>>> - load)
>>> + load|loadall)
>>> local obj
>>> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
>>
>> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
>> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> Will do, thanks!
>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
>>> return fd;
>>> }
>>> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
>>> {
>>> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
>>> char *file;
>>> char *dir;
>>> int err = 0;
>>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> - if (!err)
>>> - goto out;
>>> -
>>> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
>>> strcpy(file, name);
>>> dir = dirname(file);
>>> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
>>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
>>> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
>>> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
>>> goto out_free;
>>> }
>>
>> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
> Ack.
>
>>> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
>>> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
>>> - if (!err) {
>>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> - if (err)
>>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
>>> - strerror(errno));
>>> - } else {
>>> + if (err) {
>>> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
>>> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
>>> name, err_str);
>>> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> out_free:
>>> free(file);
>>> -out:
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> +{
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
>>> {
>>> unsigned int id;
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
>>> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
>>> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
>>> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
>>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
>>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
>>> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
>>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
>>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
>>> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
>>> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
>>> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
>>> };
>>> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
>>> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
>>> + int err, progfd;
>>> + int mapfd = 0;
>>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
>>> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> p_err("invalid attach type");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> - NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> - if (mapfd < 0)
>>> - return mapfd;
>>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> + if (mapfd < 0)
>>> + return mapfd;
>>> + }
>>> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
>>> if (err) {
>>> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
>>> + int err, progfd;
>>> + int mapfd = 0;
>>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
>>> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> p_err("invalid attach type");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> - NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>
>> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
>> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
>> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
>> types that do not take maps in the future.
> I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
> do_attach and do_detach.
Sounds good to me, thanks!
>>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> - if (mapfd < 0)
>>> - return mapfd;
>>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> + if (mapfd < 0)
>>> + return mapfd;
>>> + }
>>> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
>>> if (err) {
>>> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> +
>>> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
>>> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
>>> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
>>> };
>>> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
>>> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
>>> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
>>> - struct bpf_program *prog;
>>> struct bpf_object *obj;
>>> struct bpf_map *map;
>>> const char *pinfile;
>>> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
>>> }
>>> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
>>> - if (!prog) {
>>> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
>>> - goto err_close_obj;
>>> + if (first_prog_only) {
>>> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
>>> + if (!prog) {
>>> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
>>> + goto err_close_obj;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
>>> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
>>> + if (!prog) {
>>> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
>>> + goto err_close_obj;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
>>> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
>>> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
>>> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
>>> +
>>> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
>>> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
>>> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
>>> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
>>> + expected_attach_type);
>>> + }
>>
>> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
>> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
>> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
>> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
>> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
>> instead.
> I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
> loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
> section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
> something like that?
This is what I have in mind. But others may disagree.
> Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
> I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
I thought about an ELF file containing both an XDP and a TC classifier
program for example. XDP can mark programs for TC, then TC process them
with all the facilities we have for skbs. It does not _have_ to be in
the same ELF file, but could be.
I haven't searched samples/bpf/ in depth, but a grep on SEC shows a
couple of files with several types (kprobe/kretprobe, classifier/xdp).
samples/bpf/xdp2skb_meta_kern.c looks like a good candidate. Or actually
for testing purposes, I simply used the following:
#define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
int _version SEC("version") = 1;
SEC("classifier")
int func()
{
return 1;
}
SEC("xdp")
int funcbar()
{
return 0;
}
>>> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
>>> map_replace_compar);
>>> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> }
>>> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
>>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
>>> + if (err)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> + if (prog) {
>>
>> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
>> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
>> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
> preference.
Thanks!
Quentin
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 18:21 ` quentin.monnet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: quentin.monnet @ 2018-11-08 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
2018-11-08 10:01 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at fomichev.me>
> On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
> Thank you for another round of review!
>
>> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
>>> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
>>> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
>>> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>>>
>>> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
>>> * a bunch of tail call progs
>>> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>>>
>>> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
>>> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
>>> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
>>> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
>>>
>>> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
>>> case.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
>>> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 0 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 1 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 2 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 3 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 4 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 5 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
>>>
>>> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
>>>
>>> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
>>> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
>>> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
>>> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
>>> *COMMANDS* :=
>>> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
>>> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
>>> + | **loadall** | **help** }
>>> MAP COMMANDS
>>> =============
>>> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
>>> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog help**
>>> |
>>> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
>>> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
>>> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
>>> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
>>> | }
>>> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
>>> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
>>> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
>>> +| }
>>> DESCRIPTION
>>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
>>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
>>> extensions of *bpffs*.
>>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
>>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
>>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
>>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
>>
>> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
>> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
>> case with "loadall"
> I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> pin the maps?
>
My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
sorry about that.
>>> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
>>> inferred from section names.
>>> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
>>> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
>>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
>>> extensions of *bpffs*.
>>> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
>>> - to the map *MAP*.
>>> -
>>> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
>>> - from the map *MAP*.
>>> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
>>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
>>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
>>> + attached to current networking name space.
>>> +
>>> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
>>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
>>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
>>> + detached from the current networking name space.
>>
>> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
>> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
> Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
Those paragraphs were using spaces already, so you didn't introduce that
:). But all others use tabs so its a good occasion to fix it.
>>> **bpftool prog help**
>>> Print short help message.
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> # Completion depends on object and command in use
>>> case $object in
>>> prog)
>>> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
>>> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
>>> case $prev in
>>> id)
>>> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
>>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> fi
>>> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
>>> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
>>> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
>>> return 0
>>> fi
>>> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> fi
>>> return 0
>>> ;;
>>> - load)
>>> + load|loadall)
>>> local obj
>>> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
>>
>> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
>> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> Will do, thanks!
>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
>>> return fd;
>>> }
>>> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
>>> {
>>> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
>>> char *file;
>>> char *dir;
>>> int err = 0;
>>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> - if (!err)
>>> - goto out;
>>> -
>>> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
>>> strcpy(file, name);
>>> dir = dirname(file);
>>> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
>>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
>>> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
>>> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
>>> goto out_free;
>>> }
>>
>> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
> Ack.
>
>>> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
>>> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
>>> - if (!err) {
>>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> - if (err)
>>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
>>> - strerror(errno));
>>> - } else {
>>> + if (err) {
>>> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
>>> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
>>> name, err_str);
>>> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> out_free:
>>> free(file);
>>> -out:
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> +{
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
>>> {
>>> unsigned int id;
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
>>> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
>>> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
>>> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
>>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
>>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
>>> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
>>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
>>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
>>> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
>>> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
>>> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
>>> };
>>> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
>>> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
>>> + int err, progfd;
>>> + int mapfd = 0;
>>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
>>> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> p_err("invalid attach type");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> - NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> - if (mapfd < 0)
>>> - return mapfd;
>>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> + if (mapfd < 0)
>>> + return mapfd;
>>> + }
>>> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
>>> if (err) {
>>> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
>>> + int err, progfd;
>>> + int mapfd = 0;
>>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
>>> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> p_err("invalid attach type");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> - NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>
>> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
>> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
>> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
>> types that do not take maps in the future.
> I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
> do_attach and do_detach.
Sounds good to me, thanks!
>>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> - if (mapfd < 0)
>>> - return mapfd;
>>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> + if (mapfd < 0)
>>> + return mapfd;
>>> + }
>>> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
>>> if (err) {
>>> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> +
>>> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
>>> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
>>> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
>>> };
>>> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
>>> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
>>> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
>>> - struct bpf_program *prog;
>>> struct bpf_object *obj;
>>> struct bpf_map *map;
>>> const char *pinfile;
>>> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
>>> }
>>> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
>>> - if (!prog) {
>>> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
>>> - goto err_close_obj;
>>> + if (first_prog_only) {
>>> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
>>> + if (!prog) {
>>> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
>>> + goto err_close_obj;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
>>> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
>>> + if (!prog) {
>>> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
>>> + goto err_close_obj;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
>>> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
>>> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
>>> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
>>> +
>>> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
>>> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
>>> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
>>> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
>>> + expected_attach_type);
>>> + }
>>
>> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
>> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
>> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
>> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
>> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
>> instead.
> I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
> loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
> section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
> something like that?
This is what I have in mind. But others may disagree.
> Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
> I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
I thought about an ELF file containing both an XDP and a TC classifier
program for example. XDP can mark programs for TC, then TC process them
with all the facilities we have for skbs. It does not _have_ to be in
the same ELF file, but could be.
I haven't searched samples/bpf/ in depth, but a grep on SEC shows a
couple of files with several types (kprobe/kretprobe, classifier/xdp).
samples/bpf/xdp2skb_meta_kern.c looks like a good candidate. Or actually
for testing purposes, I simply used the following:
#define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
int _version SEC("version") = 1;
SEC("classifier")
int func()
{
return 1;
}
SEC("xdp")
int funcbar()
{
return 0;
}
>>> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
>>> map_replace_compar);
>>> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> }
>>> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
>>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
>>> + if (err)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> + if (prog) {
>>
>> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
>> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
>> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
> preference.
Thanks!
Quentin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linux-kselftest-mirror/attachments/20181108/b15e0ad6/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 18:21 ` quentin.monnet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2018-11-08 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
2018-11-08 10:01 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at fomichev.me>
> On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
> Thank you for another round of review!
>
>> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
>>> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
>>> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
>>> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>>>
>>> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
>>> * a bunch of tail call progs
>>> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>>>
>>> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
>>> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
>>> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
>>> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
>>>
>>> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
>>> case.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
>>> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 0 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 1 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 2 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 3 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 4 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
>>>
>>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>>> key 5 0 0 0 \
>>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
>>>
>>> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
>>>
>>> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
>>> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
>>> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
>>> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
>>> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
>>> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
>>> *COMMANDS* :=
>>> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
>>> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
>>> + | **loadall** | **help** }
>>> MAP COMMANDS
>>> =============
>>> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
>>> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> | **bpftool** **prog help**
>>> |
>>> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
>>> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
>>> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
>>> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
>>> | }
>>> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
>>> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
>>> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
>>> +| }
>>> DESCRIPTION
>>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
>>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
>>> extensions of *bpffs*.
>>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
>>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
>>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
>>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
>>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
>>
>> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
>> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
>> case with "loadall"
> I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> pin the maps?
>
My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
sorry about that.
>>> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
>>> inferred from section names.
>>> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
>>> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
>>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
>>> extensions of *bpffs*.
>>> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
>>> - to the map *MAP*.
>>> -
>>> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
>>> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
>>> - from the map *MAP*.
>>> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
>>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
>>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
>>> + attached to current networking name space.
>>> +
>>> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
>>> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
>>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
>>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
>>> + detached from the current networking name space.
>>
>> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
>> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
> Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
Those paragraphs were using spaces already, so you didn't introduce that
:). But all others use tabs so its a good occasion to fix it.
>>> **bpftool prog help**
>>> Print short help message.
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
>>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> # Completion depends on object and command in use
>>> case $object in
>>> prog)
>>> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
>>> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
>>> case $prev in
>>> id)
>>> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
>>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> fi
>>> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
>>> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
>>> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
>>> return 0
>>> fi
>>> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
>>> fi
>>> return 0
>>> ;;
>>> - load)
>>> + load|loadall)
>>> local obj
>>> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
>>
>> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
>> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> Will do, thanks!
>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
>>> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
>>> return fd;
>>> }
>>> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
>>> {
>>> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
>>> char *file;
>>> char *dir;
>>> int err = 0;
>>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> - if (!err)
>>> - goto out;
>>> -
>>> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
>>> strcpy(file, name);
>>> dir = dirname(file);
>>> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
>>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
>>> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
>>> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
>>> goto out_free;
>>> }
>>
>> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
> Ack.
>
>>> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
>>> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
>>> - if (!err) {
>>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> - if (err)
>>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
>>> - strerror(errno));
>>> - } else {
>>> + if (err) {
>>> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
>>> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
>>> name, err_str);
>>> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> out_free:
>>> free(file);
>>> -out:
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
>>> +{
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
>>> {
>>> unsigned int id;
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
>>> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
>>> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
>>> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
>>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
>>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
>>> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
>>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
>>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
>>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
>>> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
>>> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
>>> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
>>> };
>>> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
>>> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
>>> + int err, progfd;
>>> + int mapfd = 0;
>>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
>>> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> p_err("invalid attach type");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> - NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> - if (mapfd < 0)
>>> - return mapfd;
>>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> + if (mapfd < 0)
>>> + return mapfd;
>>> + }
>>> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
>>> if (err) {
>>> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
>>> + int err, progfd;
>>> + int mapfd = 0;
>>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
>>> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> p_err("invalid attach type");
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> - NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
>>> + NEXT_ARG();
>>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
>>> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>
>> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
>> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
>> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
>> types that do not take maps in the future.
> I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
> do_attach and do_detach.
Sounds good to me, thanks!
>>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> - if (mapfd < 0)
>>> - return mapfd;
>>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
>>> + if (mapfd < 0)
>>> + return mapfd;
>>> + }
>>> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
>>> if (err) {
>>> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
>>> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> +
>>> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
>>> {
>>> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
>>> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
>>> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
>>> };
>>> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
>>> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
>>> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
>>> - struct bpf_program *prog;
>>> struct bpf_object *obj;
>>> struct bpf_map *map;
>>> const char *pinfile;
>>> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
>>> }
>>> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
>>> - if (!prog) {
>>> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
>>> - goto err_close_obj;
>>> + if (first_prog_only) {
>>> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
>>> + if (!prog) {
>>> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
>>> + goto err_close_obj;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
>>> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
>>> + if (!prog) {
>>> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
>>> + goto err_close_obj;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
>>> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
>>> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
>>> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
>>> +
>>> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
>>> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
>>> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
>>> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
>>> + expected_attach_type);
>>> + }
>>
>> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
>> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
>> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
>> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
>> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
>> instead.
> I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
> loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
> section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
> something like that?
This is what I have in mind. But others may disagree.
> Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
> I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
I thought about an ELF file containing both an XDP and a TC classifier
program for example. XDP can mark programs for TC, then TC process them
with all the facilities we have for skbs. It does not _have_ to be in
the same ELF file, but could be.
I haven't searched samples/bpf/ in depth, but a grep on SEC shows a
couple of files with several types (kprobe/kretprobe, classifier/xdp).
samples/bpf/xdp2skb_meta_kern.c looks like a good candidate. Or actually
for testing purposes, I simply used the following:
#define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
int _version SEC("version") = 1;
SEC("classifier")
int func()
{
return 1;
}
SEC("xdp")
int funcbar()
{
return 0;
}
>>> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
>>> map_replace_compar);
>>> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> }
>>> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
>>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
>>> + if (err)
>>> goto err_close_obj;
>>> + if (prog) {
>>
>> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
>> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
>> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
> preference.
Thanks!
Quentin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linux-kselftest-mirror/attachments/20181108/b15e0ad6/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 18:21 ` quentin.monnet
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 19:01 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Quentin Monnet
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah,
jakub.kicinski, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> 2018-11-08 10:01 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
> > On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> >> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
> > Thank you for another round of review!
> >
> >> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> >>> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> >>> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> >>> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >>>
> >>> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> >>> * a bunch of tail call progs
> >>> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >>>
> >>> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> >>> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> >>> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> >>> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
> >>>
> >>> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> >>> case.
> >>>
> >>> Example:
> >>> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> >>> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 0 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 1 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 2 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 3 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 4 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 5 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
> >>>
> >>> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
> >>>
> >>> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> >>> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> >>> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> >>> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
> >>> *COMMANDS* :=
> >>> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> >>> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> >>> + | **loadall** | **help** }
> >>> MAP COMMANDS
> >>> =============
> >>> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog help**
> >>> |
> >>> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> >>> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> >>> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> >>> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> >>> | }
> >>> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> >>> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> >>> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> >>> +| }
> >>> DESCRIPTION
> >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> >>
> >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> >> case with "loadall"
> > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > pin the maps?
> >
>
> My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> sorry about that.
>
> >>> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> >>> inferred from section names.
> >>> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> >>> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> >>> - to the map *MAP*.
> >>> -
> >>> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> >>> - from the map *MAP*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> >>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> >>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> >>> + attached to current networking name space.
> >>> +
> >>> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> >>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> >>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> >>> + detached from the current networking name space.
> >>
> >> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
> >> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
> > Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
>
> Those paragraphs were using spaces already, so you didn't introduce that
> :). But all others use tabs so its a good occasion to fix it.
>
> >>> **bpftool prog help**
> >>> Print short help message.
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> # Completion depends on object and command in use
> >>> case $object in
> >>> prog)
> >>> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> >>> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> >>> case $prev in
> >>> id)
> >>> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> >>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> fi
> >>> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> >>> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> >>> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> >>> return 0
> >>> fi
> >>> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> fi
> >>> return 0
> >>> ;;
> >>> - load)
> >>> + load|loadall)
> >>> local obj
> >>> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
> >>
> >> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
> >> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> > Will do, thanks!
> >
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> >>> return fd;
> >>> }
> >>> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> >>> {
> >>> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> >>> char *file;
> >>> char *dir;
> >>> int err = 0;
> >>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> - if (!err)
> >>> - goto out;
> >>> -
> >>> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> >>> strcpy(file, name);
> >>> dir = dirname(file);
> >>> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> >>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> >>> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> >>> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> >>> goto out_free;
> >>> }
> >>
> >> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
> > Ack.
> >
> >>> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> >>> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> >>> - if (!err) {
> >>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> >>> - strerror(errno));
> >>> - } else {
> >>> + if (err) {
> >>> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> >>> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> >>> name, err_str);
> >>> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> out_free:
> >>> free(file);
> >>> -out:
> >>> return err;
> >>> }
> >>> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int err;
> >>> +
> >>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + return err;
> >>> +
> >>> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> >>> {
> >>> unsigned int id;
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> >>> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> >>> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> >>> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> >>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> >>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> >>> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> >>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> >>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> >>> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> >>> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> >>> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> >>> };
> >>> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> >>> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> >>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> >>> + int err, progfd;
> >>> + int mapfd = 0;
> >>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> >>> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> p_err("invalid attach type");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> - NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> >>> + NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> - if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> - return mapfd;
> >>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> + if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> + return mapfd;
> >>> + }
> >>> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> >>> if (err) {
> >>> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> >>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> >>> + int err, progfd;
> >>> + int mapfd = 0;
> >>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> >>> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> p_err("invalid attach type");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> - NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> >>> + NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
> >> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
> >> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
> >> types that do not take maps in the future.
> > I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
> > do_attach and do_detach.
>
> Sounds good to me, thanks!
>
> >>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> - if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> - return mapfd;
> >>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> + if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> + return mapfd;
> >>> + }
> >>> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> >>> if (err) {
> >>> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> +
> >>> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> >>> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> >>> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> >>> };
> >>> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> >>> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> >>> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> >>> - struct bpf_program *prog;
> >>> struct bpf_object *obj;
> >>> struct bpf_map *map;
> >>> const char *pinfile;
> >>> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> >>> }
> >>> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> >>> - if (!prog) {
> >>> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> >>> - goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + if (first_prog_only) {
> >>> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> >>> + if (!prog) {
> >>> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> >>> + goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> >>> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> >>> + if (!prog) {
> >>> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> >>> + goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> >>> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> >>> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> >>> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> >>> +
> >>> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> >>> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> >>> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> >>> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> >>> + expected_attach_type);
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
> >> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
> >> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
> >> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
> >> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
> >> instead.
> > I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
> > loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
> > section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
> > something like that?
>
> This is what I have in mind. But others may disagree.
Hm, I did another look and here is the problem.
Current **load** implementation actually loads all progs (and maps) from the
file: do_load -> bpf_object__load -> bpf_object__load_progs. It pins only the
first prog, but loads them all. That's why I don't understand how multiprog
loading can work currently (because we don't set correct
prog_type/expected_attach_type for all progs, only the first one).
Should we have the following functionality instead:
Both **load** and **loadall** load all maps and programs from the *OBJ* and
differ only in pinning. **load** pins only the first program from the *OBJ*
as *FILE*. **loadall** pins all programs and maps from the *OBJ* under
*FILE* directory.
If we want **load** to load only the first prog, we should probably
amend bpf_object__load to be able to filter the progs we (don't) want.
Thoughts?
> > Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
> > I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
>
> I thought about an ELF file containing both an XDP and a TC classifier
> program for example. XDP can mark programs for TC, then TC process them
> with all the facilities we have for skbs. It does not _have_ to be in
> the same ELF file, but could be.
>
> I haven't searched samples/bpf/ in depth, but a grep on SEC shows a
> couple of files with several types (kprobe/kretprobe, classifier/xdp).
> samples/bpf/xdp2skb_meta_kern.c looks like a good candidate. Or actually
> for testing purposes, I simply used the following:
>
> #define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
>
> int _version SEC("version") = 1;
>
> SEC("classifier")
> int func()
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> SEC("xdp")
> int funcbar()
> {
> return 0;
> }
Thanks, I just found socket_cookie_prog.c in selftests which has
cgroup/connect6 and sockops sections, I can probably use that for
testing.
> >>> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> >>> map_replace_compar);
> >>> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> }
> >>> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> >>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + if (prog) {
> >>
> >> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
> >> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
> >> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> > Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
> > preference.
>
> Thanks!
> Quentin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:01 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> 2018-11-08 10:01 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at fomichev.me>
> > On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> >> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
> > Thank you for another round of review!
> >
> >> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> >>> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> >>> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> >>> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >>>
> >>> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> >>> * a bunch of tail call progs
> >>> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >>>
> >>> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> >>> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> >>> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> >>> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
> >>>
> >>> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> >>> case.
> >>>
> >>> Example:
> >>> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> >>> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 0 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 1 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 2 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 3 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 4 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 5 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
> >>>
> >>> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
> >>>
> >>> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> >>> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> >>> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> >>> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
> >>> *COMMANDS* :=
> >>> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> >>> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> >>> + | **loadall** | **help** }
> >>> MAP COMMANDS
> >>> =============
> >>> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog help**
> >>> |
> >>> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> >>> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> >>> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> >>> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> >>> | }
> >>> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> >>> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> >>> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> >>> +| }
> >>> DESCRIPTION
> >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> >>
> >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> >> case with "loadall"
> > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > pin the maps?
> >
>
> My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> sorry about that.
>
> >>> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> >>> inferred from section names.
> >>> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> >>> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> >>> - to the map *MAP*.
> >>> -
> >>> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> >>> - from the map *MAP*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> >>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> >>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> >>> + attached to current networking name space.
> >>> +
> >>> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> >>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> >>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> >>> + detached from the current networking name space.
> >>
> >> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
> >> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
> > Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
>
> Those paragraphs were using spaces already, so you didn't introduce that
> :). But all others use tabs so its a good occasion to fix it.
>
> >>> **bpftool prog help**
> >>> Print short help message.
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> # Completion depends on object and command in use
> >>> case $object in
> >>> prog)
> >>> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> >>> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> >>> case $prev in
> >>> id)
> >>> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> >>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> fi
> >>> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> >>> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> >>> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> >>> return 0
> >>> fi
> >>> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> fi
> >>> return 0
> >>> ;;
> >>> - load)
> >>> + load|loadall)
> >>> local obj
> >>> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
> >>
> >> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
> >> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> > Will do, thanks!
> >
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> >>> return fd;
> >>> }
> >>> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> >>> {
> >>> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> >>> char *file;
> >>> char *dir;
> >>> int err = 0;
> >>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> - if (!err)
> >>> - goto out;
> >>> -
> >>> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> >>> strcpy(file, name);
> >>> dir = dirname(file);
> >>> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> >>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> >>> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> >>> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> >>> goto out_free;
> >>> }
> >>
> >> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
> > Ack.
> >
> >>> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> >>> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> >>> - if (!err) {
> >>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> >>> - strerror(errno));
> >>> - } else {
> >>> + if (err) {
> >>> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> >>> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> >>> name, err_str);
> >>> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> out_free:
> >>> free(file);
> >>> -out:
> >>> return err;
> >>> }
> >>> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int err;
> >>> +
> >>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + return err;
> >>> +
> >>> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> >>> {
> >>> unsigned int id;
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> >>> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> >>> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> >>> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> >>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> >>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> >>> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> >>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> >>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> >>> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> >>> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> >>> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> >>> };
> >>> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> >>> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> >>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> >>> + int err, progfd;
> >>> + int mapfd = 0;
> >>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> >>> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> p_err("invalid attach type");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> - NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> >>> + NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> - if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> - return mapfd;
> >>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> + if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> + return mapfd;
> >>> + }
> >>> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> >>> if (err) {
> >>> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> >>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> >>> + int err, progfd;
> >>> + int mapfd = 0;
> >>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> >>> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> p_err("invalid attach type");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> - NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> >>> + NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
> >> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
> >> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
> >> types that do not take maps in the future.
> > I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
> > do_attach and do_detach.
>
> Sounds good to me, thanks!
>
> >>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> - if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> - return mapfd;
> >>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> + if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> + return mapfd;
> >>> + }
> >>> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> >>> if (err) {
> >>> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> +
> >>> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> >>> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> >>> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> >>> };
> >>> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> >>> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> >>> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> >>> - struct bpf_program *prog;
> >>> struct bpf_object *obj;
> >>> struct bpf_map *map;
> >>> const char *pinfile;
> >>> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> >>> }
> >>> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> >>> - if (!prog) {
> >>> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> >>> - goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + if (first_prog_only) {
> >>> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> >>> + if (!prog) {
> >>> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> >>> + goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> >>> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> >>> + if (!prog) {
> >>> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> >>> + goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> >>> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> >>> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> >>> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> >>> +
> >>> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> >>> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> >>> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> >>> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> >>> + expected_attach_type);
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
> >> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
> >> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
> >> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
> >> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
> >> instead.
> > I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
> > loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
> > section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
> > something like that?
>
> This is what I have in mind. But others may disagree.
Hm, I did another look and here is the problem.
Current **load** implementation actually loads all progs (and maps) from the
file: do_load -> bpf_object__load -> bpf_object__load_progs. It pins only the
first prog, but loads them all. That's why I don't understand how multiprog
loading can work currently (because we don't set correct
prog_type/expected_attach_type for all progs, only the first one).
Should we have the following functionality instead:
Both **load** and **loadall** load all maps and programs from the *OBJ* and
differ only in pinning. **load** pins only the first program from the *OBJ*
as *FILE*. **loadall** pins all programs and maps from the *OBJ* under
*FILE* directory.
If we want **load** to load only the first prog, we should probably
amend bpf_object__load to be able to filter the progs we (don't) want.
Thoughts?
> > Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
> > I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
>
> I thought about an ELF file containing both an XDP and a TC classifier
> program for example. XDP can mark programs for TC, then TC process them
> with all the facilities we have for skbs. It does not _have_ to be in
> the same ELF file, but could be.
>
> I haven't searched samples/bpf/ in depth, but a grep on SEC shows a
> couple of files with several types (kprobe/kretprobe, classifier/xdp).
> samples/bpf/xdp2skb_meta_kern.c looks like a good candidate. Or actually
> for testing purposes, I simply used the following:
>
> #define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
>
> int _version SEC("version") = 1;
>
> SEC("classifier")
> int func()
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> SEC("xdp")
> int funcbar()
> {
> return 0;
> }
Thanks, I just found socket_cookie_prog.c in selftests which has
cgroup/connect6 and sockops sections, I can probably use that for
testing.
> >>> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> >>> map_replace_compar);
> >>> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> }
> >>> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> >>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + if (prog) {
> >>
> >> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
> >> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
> >> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> > Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
> > preference.
>
> Thanks!
> Quentin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:01 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> 2018-11-08 10:01 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at fomichev.me>
> > On 11/08, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> >> Hi Stanislav, thanks for the changes! More comments below.
> > Thank you for another round of review!
> >
> >> 2018-11-07 21:39 UTC-0800 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> >>> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> >>> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> >>> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >>>
> >>> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> >>> * a bunch of tail call progs
> >>> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >>>
> >>> When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
> >>> first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
> >>> passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
> >>> construct the jump table for the tail calls.
> >>>
> >>> The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
> >>> case.
> >>>
> >>> Example:
> >>> bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
> >>> /sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 0 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 1 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 2 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 3 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 4 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS
> >>>
> >>> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >>> key 5 0 0 0 \
> >>> value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN
> >>>
> >>> bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector flow_dissector
> >>>
> >>> Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
> >>> the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 36 ++++--
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 6 +-
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 30 ++---
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 1 +
> >>> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 112 +++++++++++++-----
> >>> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> index ac4e904b10fb..0374634c3087 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> >>> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
> >>> *OPTIONS* := { { **-j** | **--json** } [{ **-p** | **--pretty** }] | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } }
> >>> *COMMANDS* :=
> >>> - { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load** | **help** }
> >>> + { **show** | **list** | **dump xlated** | **dump jited** | **pin** | **load**
> >>> + | **loadall** | **help** }
> >>> MAP COMMANDS
> >>> =============
> >>> @@ -24,9 +25,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog dump xlated** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes** | **visual**}]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog dump jited** *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> -| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> +| **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> | **bpftool** **prog help**
> >>> |
> >>> | *MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
> >>> @@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> >>> | **cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
> >>> | **cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
> >>> | }
> >>> -| *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
> >>> +| *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
> >>> +| **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
> >>> +| }
> >>> DESCRIPTION
> >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> >>
> >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> >> case with "loadall"
> > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > pin the maps?
> >
>
> My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> sorry about that.
>
> >>> **type** is optional, if not specified program type will be
> >>> inferred from section names.
> >>> By default bpftool will create new maps as declared in the ELF
> >>> @@ -97,13 +103,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> - Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> >>> - to the map *MAP*.
> >>> -
> >>> - **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
> >>> - Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
> >>> - from the map *MAP*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> + Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> >>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> >>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> >>> + attached to current networking name space.
> >>> +
> >>> + **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
> >>> + Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
> >>> + *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
> >>> + parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
> >>> + detached from the current networking name space.
> >>
> >> While at it could you please fix those two paragraphs to use tabs for
> >> indentation, as the rest of the doc? Thanks!
> > Time to teach my vim to use tabs in .rst files. Sorry about that.
>
> Those paragraphs were using spaces already, so you didn't introduce that
> :). But all others use tabs so its a good occasion to fix it.
>
> >>> **bpftool prog help**
> >>> Print short help message.
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> index 3f78e6404589..ad0fc919f7ec 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> >>> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> # Completion depends on object and command in use
> >>> case $object in
> >>> prog)
> >>> - if [[ $command != "load" ]]; then
> >>> + if [[ $command != "load" && $command != "loadall" ]]; then
> >>> case $prev in
> >>> id)
> >>> _bpftool_get_prog_ids
> >>> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> fi
> >>> if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
> >>> - COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
> >>> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
> >>> return 0
> >>> fi
> >>> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ _bpftool()
> >>> fi
> >>> return 0
> >>> ;;
> >>> - load)
> >>> + load|loadall)
> >>> local obj
> >>> if [[ ${#words[@]} -lt 6 ]]; then
> >>
> >> You also want to update completion for the program types, at line 341 or so.
> >> Feel free to split that list on several lines, by the way :).
> > Will do, thanks!
> >
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
> >>> @@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
> >>> return fd;
> >>> }
> >>> -int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
> >>> {
> >>> char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
> >>> char *file;
> >>> char *dir;
> >>> int err = 0;
> >>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> - if (!err)
> >>> - goto out;
> >>> -
> >>> file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
> >>> strcpy(file, name);
> >>> dir = dirname(file);
> >>> - if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
> >>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> >>> + if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
> >>> + /* nothing to do if already mounted */
> >>> goto out_free;
> >>> }
> >>
> >> Nitpick: unnecessary brackets.
> > Ack.
> >
> >>> - /* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
> >>> err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
> >>> - if (!err) {
> >>> - err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
> >>> - strerror(errno));
> >>> - } else {
> >>> + if (err) {
> >>> err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> >>> p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
> >>> name, err_str);
> >>> @@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> out_free:
> >>> free(file);
> >>> -out:
> >>> return err;
> >>> }
> >>> +int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int err;
> >>> +
> >>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + return err;
> >>> +
> >>> + return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
> >>> {
> >>> unsigned int id;
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
> >>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
> >>> char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
> >>> int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
> >>> int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
> >>> +int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
> >>> int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
> >>> int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
> >>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> index 5302ee282409..a4346dd673b1 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> >>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
> >>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
> >>> [BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
> >>> [BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
> >>> + [BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
> >>> [__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
> >>> };
> >>> @@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> >>> static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> >>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> >>> + int err, progfd;
> >>> + int mapfd = 0;
> >>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> >>> - p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for attach");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> p_err("invalid attach type");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> - NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> >>> + NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> - if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> - return mapfd;
> >>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> + if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> + return mapfd;
> >>> + }
> >>> err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
> >>> if (err) {
> >>> @@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> >>> - int err, mapfd, progfd;
> >>> + int err, progfd;
> >>> + int mapfd = 0;
> >>> - if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
> >>> - p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for detach");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> p_err("invalid attach type");
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> - NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
> >>> + NEXT_ARG();
> >>> + if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
> >>> + p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> Would that make sense to factor argument checks or parsing for do_attach()
> >> and do_detach() to some extent? In order to reduce the number of
> >> attach-type-based exceptions to add in the code if we have other attach
> >> types that do not take maps in the future.
> > I can move all argument parsing into a new function and use it from both
> > do_attach and do_detach.
>
> Sounds good to me, thanks!
>
> >>> - mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> - if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> - return mapfd;
> >>> + mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
> >>> + if (mapfd < 0)
> >>> + return mapfd;
> >>> + }
> >>> err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
> >>> if (err) {
> >>> @@ -792,15 +807,16 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> -static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> +
> >>> +static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
> >>> {
> >>> enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
> >>> struct bpf_object_open_attr attr = {
> >>> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> >>> };
> >>> struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
> >>> + struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
> >>> unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
> >>> - struct bpf_program *prog;
> >>> struct bpf_object *obj;
> >>> struct bpf_map *map;
> >>> const char *pinfile;
> >>> @@ -918,14 +934,20 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_free_reuse_maps;
> >>> }
> >>> - prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> >>> - if (!prog) {
> >>> - p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> >>> - goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + if (first_prog_only) {
> >>> + prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> >>> + if (!prog) {
> >>> + p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
> >>> + goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>> - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> >>> if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> >>> + if (!prog) {
> >>> + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
> >>> + goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> >>> err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> >>> @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> >>> - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> >>> +
> >>> + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> >>> + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> >>> + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> >>> + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> >>> + expected_attach_type);
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be able
> >> to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no type is
> >> provided from command line we can retrieve types for each program from its
> >> section name. If a type is provided on the command line, we can do the same,
> >> but I am not sure we should do it, or impose that type for all programs
> >> instead.
> > I can move auto-detection into this new bpf_object__for_each_program
> > loop. So if no type is specified, try to infer the type from each prog
> > section name, otherwise, use the provided one for all progs. Do we want
> > something like that?
>
> This is what I have in mind. But others may disagree.
Hm, I did another look and here is the problem.
Current **load** implementation actually loads all progs (and maps) from the
file: do_load -> bpf_object__load -> bpf_object__load_progs. It pins only the
first prog, but loads them all. That's why I don't understand how multiprog
loading can work currently (because we don't set correct
prog_type/expected_attach_type for all progs, only the first one).
Should we have the following functionality instead:
Both **load** and **loadall** load all maps and programs from the *OBJ* and
differ only in pinning. **load** pins only the first program from the *OBJ*
as *FILE*. **loadall** pins all programs and maps from the *OBJ* under
*FILE* directory.
If we want **load** to load only the first prog, we should probably
amend bpf_object__load to be able to filter the progs we (don't) want.
Thoughts?
> > Btw, do you have some existing real life example of where it's needed so
> > I can test this new implementation? (maybe something under samples/ ?)
>
> I thought about an ELF file containing both an XDP and a TC classifier
> program for example. XDP can mark programs for TC, then TC process them
> with all the facilities we have for skbs. It does not _have_ to be in
> the same ELF file, but could be.
>
> I haven't searched samples/bpf/ in depth, but a grep on SEC shows a
> couple of files with several types (kprobe/kretprobe, classifier/xdp).
> samples/bpf/xdp2skb_meta_kern.c looks like a good candidate. Or actually
> for testing purposes, I simply used the following:
>
> #define SEC(NAME) __attribute__((section(NAME), used))
>
> int _version SEC("version") = 1;
>
> SEC("classifier")
> int func()
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> SEC("xdp")
> int funcbar()
> {
> return 0;
> }
Thanks, I just found socket_cookie_prog.c in selftests which has
cgroup/connect6 and sockops sections, I can probably use that for
testing.
> >>> qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
> >>> map_replace_compar);
> >>> @@ -1001,9 +1028,25 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> }
> >>> - if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
> >>> + err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> goto err_close_obj;
> >>> + if (prog) {
> >>
> >> Nit: Maybe "if (first_prog_only) {" instead? If I understand correctly, at
> >> this stage it should be equivalent, but in my opinion it would make it
> >> easier to understand why we have two cases here.
> > Sure, I can do that if you think that's more readable, I don't have a
> > preference.
>
> Thanks!
> Quentin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 18:21 ` quentin.monnet
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 19:35 ` jakub.kicinski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Quentin Monnet
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest,
ast, daniel, shuah, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> >>
> >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> >> case with "loadall"
> > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > pin the maps?
> >
>
> My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> sorry about that.
Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
find their maps with relative ease.
$ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
possibly:
$ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
6
Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
unloadable..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:35 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: jakub.kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> >>
> >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> >> case with "loadall"
> > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > pin the maps?
> >
>
> My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> sorry about that.
Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
find their maps with relative ease.
$ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
possibly:
$ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
6
Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
unloadable..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:35 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> >>
> >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> >> case with "loadall"
> > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > pin the maps?
> >
>
> My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> sorry about that.
Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
find their maps with relative ease.
$ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
possibly:
$ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
6
Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
unloadable..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 11:16 ` quentin.monnet
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 19:45 ` jakub.kicinski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Quentin Monnet
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah,
guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:16:43 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
No new lines in p_err(), beaks JSON.
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > +
> > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> >
> > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > +
> > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > + expected_attach_type);
> > + }
>
> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> that type for all programs instead.
attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:45 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: jakub.kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:16:43 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
No new lines in p_err(), beaks JSON.
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > +
> > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> >
> > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > +
> > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > + expected_attach_type);
> > + }
>
> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> that type for all programs instead.
attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:45 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:16:43 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > + if (!prog) {
> > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
No new lines in p_err(), beaks JSON.
> > + goto err_close_obj;
> > + }
> > +
> > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> >
> > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto err_close_obj;
> > }
> > }
> > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > +
> > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > + expected_attach_type);
> > + }
>
> I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> that type for all programs instead.
attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 19:46 ` jakub.kicinski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah, quentin.monnet,
guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7, john.fastabend, jbenc,
treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>
> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> * a bunch of tail call progs
> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
two separate patches?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:46 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: jakub.kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>
> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> * a bunch of tail call progs
> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
two separate patches?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 19:46 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
>
> * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> * a bunch of tail call progs
> * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
two separate patches?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 19:35 ` jakub.kicinski
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 21:20 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Quentin Monnet, Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast,
daniel, shuah, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> > >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> > >>
> > >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> > >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> > >> case with "loadall"
> > > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > > pin the maps?
> > >
> >
> > My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> > sorry about that.
>
> Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
It does seem convenient to have an option to pin everything, so we
don't require anything else to find the ids of the maps.
If we are pinning all progs, might as well pin the maps, why not? See
my example in the commit message, for example, where I just hard code
the expected map name. Convenient :-)
> The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
> to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
> find their maps with relative ease.
>
> $ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
> 7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
> loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
> xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
>
> possibly:
>
> $ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
> 6
>
> Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
> unloadable..
It doesn't sound like a big problem, sounds like a constraint we can live
with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:20 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> > >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> > >>
> > >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> > >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> > >> case with "loadall"
> > > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > > pin the maps?
> > >
> >
> > My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> > sorry about that.
>
> Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
It does seem convenient to have an option to pin everything, so we
don't require anything else to find the ids of the maps.
If we are pinning all progs, might as well pin the maps, why not? See
my example in the commit message, for example, where I just hard code
the expected map name. Convenient :-)
> The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
> to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
> find their maps with relative ease.
>
> $ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
> 7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
> loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
> xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
>
> possibly:
>
> $ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
> 6
>
> Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
> unloadable..
It doesn't sound like a big problem, sounds like a constraint we can live
with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:20 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> > >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> > >>
> > >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> > >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> > >> case with "loadall"
> > > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > > pin the maps?
> > >
> >
> > My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> > sorry about that.
>
> Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
It does seem convenient to have an option to pin everything, so we
don't require anything else to find the ids of the maps.
If we are pinning all progs, might as well pin the maps, why not? See
my example in the commit message, for example, where I just hard code
the expected map name. Convenient :-)
> The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
> to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
> find their maps with relative ease.
>
> $ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
> 7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
> loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
> xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
>
> possibly:
>
> $ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
> 6
>
> Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
> unloadable..
It doesn't sound like a big problem, sounds like a constraint we can live
with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 19:45 ` jakub.kicinski
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 21:25 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Quentin Monnet, Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast,
daniel, shuah, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:16:43 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > > + if (!prog) {
> > > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
>
> No new lines in p_err(), beaks JSON.
Thanks, I'll probably remove that altogether and do auto inference of
prog_type from the section name here.
> > > + goto err_close_obj;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > >
> > > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > > goto err_close_obj;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > > +
> > > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > > + expected_attach_type);
> > > + }
> >
> > I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> > able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> > type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> > program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> > line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> > that type for all programs instead.
>
> attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
Isn't it used only in __bpf_object__open_xattr to require/not-require kernel
version in the bpf prog?
It will probably work quite nicely for both of our options:
* type not specified: prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, need kernel
version (over cautious?)
* type specified (and applied to all progs): using bpf_prog_type__needs_kver
to require/not requqire kernel version
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:25 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:16:43 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > > + if (!prog) {
> > > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
>
> No new lines in p_err(), beaks JSON.
Thanks, I'll probably remove that altogether and do auto inference of
prog_type from the section name here.
> > > + goto err_close_obj;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > >
> > > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > > goto err_close_obj;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > > +
> > > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > > + expected_attach_type);
> > > + }
> >
> > I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> > able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> > type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> > program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> > line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> > that type for all programs instead.
>
> attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
Isn't it used only in __bpf_object__open_xattr to require/not-require kernel
version in the bpf prog?
It will probably work quite nicely for both of our options:
* type not specified: prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, need kernel
version (over cautious?)
* type specified (and applied to all progs): using bpf_prog_type__needs_kver
to require/not requqire kernel version
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:25 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:16:43 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > - bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
> > > if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
> > > + if (!prog) {
> > > + p_err("can not guess program type when loading all programs\n");
>
> No new lines in p_err(), beaks JSON.
Thanks, I'll probably remove that altogether and do auto inference of
prog_type from the section name here.
> > > + goto err_close_obj;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > >
> > > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > > goto err_close_obj;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > > +
> > > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > > + expected_attach_type);
> > > + }
> >
> > I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> > able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> > type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> > program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> > line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> > that type for all programs instead.
>
> attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
Isn't it used only in __bpf_object__open_xattr to require/not-require kernel
version in the bpf prog?
It will probably work quite nicely for both of our options:
* type not specified: prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, need kernel
version (over cautious?)
* type specified (and applied to all progs): using bpf_prog_type__needs_kver
to require/not requqire kernel version
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 19:46 ` jakub.kicinski
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 21:29 ` sdf
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah,
quentin.monnet, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >
> > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>
> Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
> two separate patches?
Sure, will do, but let's first agree on the semantical differences of
load vs loadall.
So far *load* actually loads _all_ progs (via bpf_object__load), but pins
only the first program. Is that what we want? I wonder whether the
assumption there was that there is only single program in the object.
Should we load only the first program in *load*?
If we add *loadall*, then the difference would be:
*load*:
* loads all maps and only the first program, pins only the first
program
*loadall*:
* loads all maps and all programs, pins everything (maps and programs)
Is this the expected behavior?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:29 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2018-11-08 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >
> > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>
> Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
> two separate patches?
Sure, will do, but let's first agree on the semantical differences of
load vs loadall.
So far *load* actually loads _all_ progs (via bpf_object__load), but pins
only the first program. Is that what we want? I wonder whether the
assumption there was that there is only single program in the object.
Should we load only the first program in *load*?
If we add *loadall*, then the difference would be:
*load*:
* loads all maps and only the first program, pins only the first
program
*loadall*:
* loads all maps and all programs, pins everything (maps and programs)
Is this the expected behavior?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:29 ` sdf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2018-11-08 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> >
> > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
>
> Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
> two separate patches?
Sure, will do, but let's first agree on the semantical differences of
load vs loadall.
So far *load* actually loads _all_ progs (via bpf_object__load), but pins
only the first program. Is that what we want? I wonder whether the
assumption there was that there is only single program in the object.
Should we load only the first program in *load*?
If we add *loadall*, then the difference would be:
*load*:
* loads all maps and only the first program, pins only the first
program
*loadall*:
* loads all maps and all programs, pins everything (maps and programs)
Is this the expected behavior?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 21:20 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 21:51 ` jakub.kicinski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: Quentin Monnet, Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast,
daniel, shuah, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:20:12 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > > >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > > >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> > > >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > > >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > > >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > > >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > > >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > > >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> > > >>
> > > >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> > > >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> > > >> case with "loadall"
> > > > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > > > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > > > pin the maps?
> > > >
> > >
> > > My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> > > sorry about that.
> >
> > Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
> It does seem convenient to have an option to pin everything, so we
> don't require anything else to find the ids of the maps.
> If we are pinning all progs, might as well pin the maps, why not? See
> my example in the commit message, for example, where I just hard code
> the expected map name. Convenient :-)
Sure. I can see how its convenient to your use case. A lot of people
will be very used to finding out the maps because if program is loaded
with iproute2 tools neither programs nor maps get pinned.
Please add a "pinmaps MAP_DIR" optional parameter as a separate patch.
> > The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
> > to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
> > find their maps with relative ease.
> >
> > $ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
> > 7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
> > loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
> > xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
> >
> > possibly:
> >
> > $ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
> > 6
> >
> > Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
> > unloadable..
> It doesn't sound like a big problem, sounds like a constraint we can live
> with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:51 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: jakub.kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:20:12 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > > >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > > >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> > > >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > > >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > > >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > > >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > > >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > > >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> > > >>
> > > >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> > > >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> > > >> case with "loadall"
> > > > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > > > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > > > pin the maps?
> > > >
> > >
> > > My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> > > sorry about that.
> >
> > Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
> It does seem convenient to have an option to pin everything, so we
> don't require anything else to find the ids of the maps.
> If we are pinning all progs, might as well pin the maps, why not? See
> my example in the commit message, for example, where I just hard code
> the expected map name. Convenient :-)
Sure. I can see how its convenient to your use case. A lot of people
will be very used to finding out the maps because if program is loaded
with iproute2 tools neither programs nor maps get pinned.
Please add a "pinmaps MAP_DIR" optional parameter as a separate patch.
> > The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
> > to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
> > find their maps with relative ease.
> >
> > $ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
> > 7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
> > loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
> > xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
> >
> > possibly:
> >
> > $ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
> > 6
> >
> > Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
> > unloadable..
> It doesn't sound like a big problem, sounds like a constraint we can live
> with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:51 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:20:12 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:21:24 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > >>> @@ -79,8 +82,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
> > > >>> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> > > >>> extensions of *bpffs*.
> > > >>> - **bpftool prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > > >>> + **bpftool prog { load | loadall }** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
> > > >>> Load bpf program from binary *OBJ* and pin as *FILE*.
> > > >>> + **bpftool prog load** will pin only the first bpf program
> > > >>> + from the *OBJ*, **bpftool prog loadall** will pin all maps
> > > >>> + and programs from the *OBJ*.
> > > >>
> > > >> This could be improved regarding maps: with "bpftool prog load" I think we
> > > >> also load and pin all maps, but your description implies this is only the
> > > >> case with "loadall"
> > > > I don't think we pin any maps with `bpftool prog load`, we certainly load
> > > > them, but we don't pin any afaict. Can you point me to the code where we
> > > > pin the maps?
> > > >
> > >
> > > My bad. I read "pin" but thought "load". It does not pin them indeed,
> > > sorry about that.
> >
> > Right, but I don't see much reason why prog loadall should pin maps.
> It does seem convenient to have an option to pin everything, so we
> don't require anything else to find the ids of the maps.
> If we are pinning all progs, might as well pin the maps, why not? See
> my example in the commit message, for example, where I just hard code
> the expected map name. Convenient :-)
Sure. I can see how its convenient to your use case. A lot of people
will be very used to finding out the maps because if program is loaded
with iproute2 tools neither programs nor maps get pinned.
Please add a "pinmaps MAP_DIR" optional parameter as a separate patch.
> > The reason to pin program(s) is to hold some reference and to be able
> > to find them. Since we have the programs pinned we should be able to
> > find their maps with relative ease.
> >
> > $ bpftool prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog
> > 7: cgroup_skb tag 2a142ef67aaad174 gpl
> > loaded_at 2018-11-08T11:02:25-0800 uid 0
> > xlated 296B jited 229B memlock 4096B map_ids 6,7
> >
> > possibly:
> >
> > $ bpftool -j prog show pinned /sys/fs/bpf/prog | jq '.map_ids[0]'
> > 6
> >
> > Moreover, I think program and map names may collide making ELFs
> > unloadable..
> It doesn't sound like a big problem, sounds like a constraint we can live
> with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 21:25 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 21:52 ` jakub.kicinski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: Quentin Monnet, Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast,
daniel, shuah, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:25:39 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > + goto err_close_obj;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > > >
> > > > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > > > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > > > goto err_close_obj;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > > > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > > > +
> > > > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > > > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > > > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > > > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > > > + expected_attach_type);
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> > > able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> > > type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> > > program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> > > line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> > > that type for all programs instead.
> >
> > attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
> Isn't it used only in __bpf_object__open_xattr to require/not-require kernel
> version in the bpf prog?
>
> It will probably work quite nicely for both of our options:
>
> * type not specified: prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, need kernel
> version (over cautious?)
> * type specified (and applied to all progs): using bpf_prog_type__needs_kver
> to require/not requqire kernel version
Right, but they you can't infer it from the program name, since there's
multiple.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:52 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: jakub.kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:25:39 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > + goto err_close_obj;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > > >
> > > > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > > > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > > > goto err_close_obj;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > > > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > > > +
> > > > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > > > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > > > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > > > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > > > + expected_attach_type);
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> > > able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> > > type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> > > program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> > > line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> > > that type for all programs instead.
> >
> > attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
> Isn't it used only in __bpf_object__open_xattr to require/not-require kernel
> version in the bpf prog?
>
> It will probably work quite nicely for both of our options:
>
> * type not specified: prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, need kernel
> version (over cautious?)
> * type specified (and applied to all progs): using bpf_prog_type__needs_kver
> to require/not requqire kernel version
Right, but they you can't infer it from the program name, since there's
multiple.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:52 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:25:39 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > + goto err_close_obj;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
> > > >
> > > > err = libbpf_prog_type_by_name(sec_name, &attr.prog_type,
> > > > @@ -936,8 +958,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
> > > > goto err_close_obj;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > - bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
> > > > - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
> > > > +
> > > > + bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
> > > > + bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
> > > > + bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
> > > > + bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
> > > > + expected_attach_type);
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > I still believe you can have programs of different types here, and be
> > > able to load them. I tried it and managed to have it working fine. If no
> > > type is provided from command line we can retrieve types for each
> > > program from its section name. If a type is provided on the command
> > > line, we can do the same, but I am not sure we should do it, or impose
> > > that type for all programs instead.
> >
> > attr->prog_type is one per object, though. How do we set that one?
> Isn't it used only in __bpf_object__open_xattr to require/not-require kernel
> version in the bpf prog?
>
> It will probably work quite nicely for both of our options:
>
> * type not specified: prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, need kernel
> version (over cautious?)
> * type specified (and applied to all progs): using bpf_prog_type__needs_kver
> to require/not requqire kernel version
Right, but they you can't infer it from the program name, since there's
multiple.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
2018-11-08 21:29 ` sdf
(?)
@ 2018-11-08 21:54 ` jakub.kicinski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, netdev, linux-kselftest, ast, daniel, shuah,
quentin.monnet, guro, jiong.wang, bhole_prashant_q7,
john.fastabend, jbenc, treeze.taeung, yhs, osk, sandipan
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:29:40 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> > >
> > > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >
> > Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
> > two separate patches?
> Sure, will do, but let's first agree on the semantical differences of
> load vs loadall.
>
> So far *load* actually loads _all_ progs (via bpf_object__load), but pins
> only the first program. Is that what we want? I wonder whether the
> assumption there was that there is only single program in the object.
> Should we load only the first program in *load*?
>
> If we add *loadall*, then the difference would be:
> *load*:
> * loads all maps and only the first program, pins only the first
> program
> *loadall*:
> * loads all maps and all programs, pins everything (maps and programs)
>
> Is this the expected behavior?
Loading all programs and maps for "load" is just a libbpf limitation we
can remove at some point.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:54 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: jakub.kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:29:40 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> > >
> > > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >
> > Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
> > two separate patches?
> Sure, will do, but let's first agree on the semantical differences of
> load vs loadall.
>
> So far *load* actually loads _all_ progs (via bpf_object__load), but pins
> only the first program. Is that what we want? I wonder whether the
> assumption there was that there is only single program in the object.
> Should we load only the first program in *load*?
>
> If we add *loadall*, then the difference would be:
> *load*:
> * loads all maps and only the first program, pins only the first
> program
> *loadall*:
> * loads all maps and all programs, pins everything (maps and programs)
>
> Is this the expected behavior?
Loading all programs and maps for "load" is just a libbpf limitation we
can remove at some point.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector
@ 2018-11-08 21:54 ` jakub.kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 54+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2018-11-08 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:29:40 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:39:57 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
> > > dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
> > > assumed to be the same as in the selftests:
> > >
> > > * flow_dissector section with the main entry point
> > > * a bunch of tail call progs
> > > * a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs
> >
> > Could you split the loadall changes and the flow_dissector changes into
> > two separate patches?
> Sure, will do, but let's first agree on the semantical differences of
> load vs loadall.
>
> So far *load* actually loads _all_ progs (via bpf_object__load), but pins
> only the first program. Is that what we want? I wonder whether the
> assumption there was that there is only single program in the object.
> Should we load only the first program in *load*?
>
> If we add *loadall*, then the difference would be:
> *load*:
> * loads all maps and only the first program, pins only the first
> program
> *loadall*:
> * loads all maps and all programs, pins everything (maps and programs)
>
> Is this the expected behavior?
Loading all programs and maps for "load" is just a libbpf limitation we
can remove at some point.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 54+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-09 7:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-08 5:39 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
2018-11-08 5:39 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
2018-11-08 5:39 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
2018-11-08 5:39 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/4] libbpf: bpf_program__pin: add special case for instances.nr == 1 Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
2018-11-08 5:39 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: support loading flow dissector Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 5:39 ` sdf
2018-11-08 11:16 ` Quentin Monnet
2018-11-08 11:16 ` Quentin Monnet
2018-11-08 11:16 ` quentin.monnet
2018-11-08 18:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 18:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 18:01 ` sdf
2018-11-08 18:21 ` Quentin Monnet
2018-11-08 18:21 ` Quentin Monnet
2018-11-08 18:21 ` quentin.monnet
2018-11-08 19:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 19:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 19:01 ` sdf
2018-11-08 19:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 19:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 19:35 ` jakub.kicinski
2018-11-08 21:20 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 21:20 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 21:20 ` sdf
2018-11-08 21:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 21:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 21:51 ` jakub.kicinski
2018-11-08 19:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 19:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 19:45 ` jakub.kicinski
2018-11-08 21:25 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 21:25 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 21:25 ` sdf
2018-11-08 21:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 21:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 21:52 ` jakub.kicinski
2018-11-08 19:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 19:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 19:46 ` jakub.kicinski
2018-11-08 21:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 21:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-11-08 21:29 ` sdf
2018-11-08 21:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 21:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-11-08 21:54 ` jakub.kicinski
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.