All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"László Érsek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coroutine-sigaltstack: Add SIGUSR2 mutex
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:13:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c766d8d-4deb-ccef-1be1-a26a6654a88a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210125120305.19520-1-mreitz@redhat.com>

On 1/25/21 6:03 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> Disposition (action) for any given signal is global for the process.
> When two threads run coroutine-sigaltstack's qemu_coroutine_new()
> concurrently, they may interfere with each other: One of them may revert
> the SIGUSR2 handler to SIG_DFL, between the other thread (a) setting up
> coroutine_trampoline() as the handler and (b) raising SIGUSR2.  That
> SIGUSR2 will then terminate the QEMU process abnormally.
> 
> We have to ensure that only one thread at a time can modify the
> process-global SIGUSR2 handler.  To do so, wrap the whole section where
> that is done in a mutex.
> 
> Alternatively, we could for example have the SIGUSR2 handler always be
> coroutine_trampoline(), so there would be no need to invoke sigaction()
> in qemu_coroutine_new().  Laszlo has posted a patch to do so here:
> 
>   https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-01/msg05962.html

I indeed like that one, but also concur that simplicity trumps the
uncertainty of a larger patch.  Let's get things unbroken before we
worry about optimizing things to avoid the mutex.

> 
> However, given that coroutine-sigaltstack is more of a fallback
> implementation for platforms that do not support ucontext, that change
> may be a bit too invasive to be comfortable with it.  The mutex proposed
> here may negatively impact performance, but the change is much simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> ---
>  util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-27 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25 12:03 [PATCH] coroutine-sigaltstack: Add SIGUSR2 mutex Max Reitz
2021-01-25 21:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-26 12:44 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-26 13:16   ` Max Reitz
2021-01-26 20:06     ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-26 16:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-01-27 19:13 ` Eric Blake [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c766d8d-4deb-ccef-1be1-a26a6654a88a@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.