From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org, amit.kachhap@arm.com, andreyknvl@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:51:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <8cabc8ff-fe9f-f476-a58b-0bf0fb71c499@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190904114910.GY27757@arm.com> On 04/09/2019 12:49, Dave Martin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:29pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: >> Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t without >> the required fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. >> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >> --- >> v3 --> v4 >> - fix commit >> - added signal.h >> - added test description >> --- >> .../testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..08ecd8073a1a >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited >> + * >> + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack missing the mandatory FPSIMD >> + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test >> + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <stdio.h> >> +#include <signal.h> >> +#include <ucontext.h> >> + >> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" >> +#include "testcases.h" >> + >> +struct fake_sigframe sf; >> + >> +static int fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, >> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) >> +{ >> + size_t resv_sz, offset; >> + struct _aarch64_ctx *head = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf); >> + >> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ >> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) >> + return 1; >> + >> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); >> + head = get_header(head, FPSIMD_MAGIC, resv_sz, &offset); >> + if (head && resv_sz - offset >= HDR_SZ) { >> + fprintf(stderr, "Mangling template header. Spare space:%zd\n", >> + resv_sz - offset); >> + /* Just overwrite fpsmid_context */ >> + write_terminator_record(head); > > Strictly speaking, we may be throwing away more than just the > fpsimd_context record here. > > But I think the test works nonetheless. fpsimd_context is the only > record that's mandatory in any case. Ok > >> + >> + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc); >> + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 0); >> + } >> + >> + return 1; >> +} >> + >> +struct tdescr tde = { >> + .name = "FAKE_SIGRETURN_MISSING_FPSIMD", >> + .descr = "Triggers a sigreturn with a missing fpsimd_context", >> + .sig_ok = SIGSEGV, >> + .timeout = 3, >> + .run = fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd_run, >> +}; > > Assuming the comment I just posted on v3 of this patch makes sense to you, > > Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > Thanks Cheers Cristian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Cc: amit.kachhap@arm.com, andreyknvl@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:51:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <8cabc8ff-fe9f-f476-a58b-0bf0fb71c499@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190904114910.GY27757@arm.com> On 04/09/2019 12:49, Dave Martin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:29pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: >> Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t without >> the required fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. >> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >> --- >> v3 --> v4 >> - fix commit >> - added signal.h >> - added test description >> --- >> .../testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..08ecd8073a1a >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited >> + * >> + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack missing the mandatory FPSIMD >> + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test >> + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <stdio.h> >> +#include <signal.h> >> +#include <ucontext.h> >> + >> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" >> +#include "testcases.h" >> + >> +struct fake_sigframe sf; >> + >> +static int fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, >> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) >> +{ >> + size_t resv_sz, offset; >> + struct _aarch64_ctx *head = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf); >> + >> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ >> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) >> + return 1; >> + >> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); >> + head = get_header(head, FPSIMD_MAGIC, resv_sz, &offset); >> + if (head && resv_sz - offset >= HDR_SZ) { >> + fprintf(stderr, "Mangling template header. Spare space:%zd\n", >> + resv_sz - offset); >> + /* Just overwrite fpsmid_context */ >> + write_terminator_record(head); > > Strictly speaking, we may be throwing away more than just the > fpsimd_context record here. > > But I think the test works nonetheless. fpsimd_context is the only > record that's mandatory in any case. Ok > >> + >> + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc); >> + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 0); >> + } >> + >> + return 1; >> +} >> + >> +struct tdescr tde = { >> + .name = "FAKE_SIGRETURN_MISSING_FPSIMD", >> + .descr = "Triggers a sigreturn with a missing fpsimd_context", >> + .sig_ok = SIGSEGV, >> + .timeout = 3, >> + .run = fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd_run, >> +}; > > Assuming the comment I just posted on v3 of this patch makes sense to you, > > Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > Thanks Cheers Cristian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-09 17:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-02 11:29 [PATCH v5 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] kselftest: arm64: add skeleton Makefile Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-03 9:26 ` Amit Kachhap 2019-09-03 9:26 ` Amit Kachhap 2019-09-03 9:45 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-03 9:45 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 17:57 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 17:57 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-09 12:42 ` Amit Kachhap 2019-09-09 12:42 ` Amit Kachhap 2019-09-16 11:41 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-16 11:41 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:47 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:47 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-05 13:45 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 13:45 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 14:18 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-05 14:18 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] kselftest: arm64: add common utils and one testcase Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:47 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:47 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-06 10:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-06 10:26 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-16 11:40 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-16 11:40 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el[123][ht] Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-09 15:51 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-09 15:51 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:48 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-09 17:31 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-09 17:31 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size_for_magic0 Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-09 17:47 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-09 17:47 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-09 17:51 ` Cristian Marussi [this message] 2019-09-09 17:51 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-05 12:15 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 12:15 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 12:39 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-05 12:39 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-05 13:32 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 13:32 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-05 14:20 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-05 14:20 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-09 18:03 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-09 18:03 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-09 18:11 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-09 18:11 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp Cristian Marussi 2019-09-02 11:29 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:49 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-09 18:32 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-09 18:32 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-04 11:47 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Dave Martin 2019-09-04 11:47 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-10 12:25 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-10 12:25 ` Cristian Marussi 2019-09-16 12:14 ` Dave Martin 2019-09-16 12:14 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=8cabc8ff-fe9f-f476-a58b-0bf0fb71c499@arm.com \ --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \ --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \ --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.