All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] lib: vdso: inline do_hres()
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:06:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cdb8a09-b1b6-c0a4-8b30-da095a9a660c@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8vbrpej.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>



On 01/10/2020 09:07 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christophe Leroy
>> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> do_hres() is called from several places, so GCC doesn't inline
>>> it at first.
>>>
>>> do_hres() takes a struct __kernel_timespec * parameter for
>>> passing the result. In the 32 bits case, this parameter corresponds
>>> to a local var in the caller. In order to provide a pointer
>>> to this structure, the caller has to put it in its stack and
>>> do_hres() has to write the result in the stack. This is suboptimal,
>>> especially on RISC processor like powerpc.
>>>
>>> By making GCC inline the function, the struct __kernel_timespec
>>> remains a local var using registers, avoiding the need to write and
>>> read stack.
>>>
>>> The improvement is significant on powerpc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>>
>> Good idea, I can see how this ends up being an improvement
>> for most of the callers.
>>
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-3-dima@arista.com
> 
> On the way to be applied.
> 

Oh nice, I get even better result with the way it is done by Dmitry 
compared to my own first patch.

On an mpc8xx at 132Mhz (32bits powerpc), before the patch I have
gettimeofday:    vdso: 1256 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-raw:    vdso: 1449 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-coarse:    vdso: 768 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic:    vdso: 1390 nsec/call

With the patch I have:
gettimeofday:    vdso: 947 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-raw:    vdso: 1156 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-coarse:    vdso: 638 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic:    vdso: 1094 nsec/call

So that's a 20-25% improvement.

I modified it slightly as follows:

diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
index 9e474d54814f..b793f211bca8 100644
--- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
+++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ u64 vdso_calc_delta(u64 cycles, u64 last, u64 mask, 
u32 mult)
  }
  #endif

-static int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clk,
-		   struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
+static __always_inline int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
+				   struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
  {
  	const struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts = &vd->basetime[clk];
  	u64 cycles, last, sec, ns;
@@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ static int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
  	return 0;
  }

-static void do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clk,
-		      struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
+static __always_inline int do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
+				     struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
  {
  	const struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts = &vd->basetime[clk];
  	u32 seq;
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ static void do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
  		ts->tv_sec = vdso_ts->sec;
  		ts->tv_nsec = vdso_ts->nsec;
  	} while (unlikely(vdso_read_retry(vd, seq)));
+
+	return 0;
  }

  static __maybe_unused int
@@ -95,15 +97,16 @@ __cvdso_clock_gettime_common(const struct vdso_data 
*vd, clockid_t clock,
  	 * clocks are handled in the VDSO directly.
  	 */
  	msk = 1U << clock;
-	if (likely(msk & VDSO_HRES)) {
-		return do_hres(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
-	} else if (msk & VDSO_COARSE) {
-		do_coarse(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
-		return 0;
-	} else if (msk & VDSO_RAW) {
-		return do_hres(&vd[CS_RAW], clock, ts);
-	}
-	return -1;
+	if (likely(msk & VDSO_HRES))
+		vd += CS_HRES_COARSE;
+	else if (msk & VDSO_COARSE)
+		return do_coarse(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
+	else if (msk & VDSO_RAW)
+		vd += CS_RAW;
+	else
+		return -1;
+
+	return do_hres(vd, clock, ts);
  }

  static __maybe_unused int

---

Christophe

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] lib: vdso: inline do_hres()
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:06:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cdb8a09-b1b6-c0a4-8b30-da095a9a660c@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8vbrpej.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>



On 01/10/2020 09:07 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christophe Leroy
>> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> do_hres() is called from several places, so GCC doesn't inline
>>> it at first.
>>>
>>> do_hres() takes a struct __kernel_timespec * parameter for
>>> passing the result. In the 32 bits case, this parameter corresponds
>>> to a local var in the caller. In order to provide a pointer
>>> to this structure, the caller has to put it in its stack and
>>> do_hres() has to write the result in the stack. This is suboptimal,
>>> especially on RISC processor like powerpc.
>>>
>>> By making GCC inline the function, the struct __kernel_timespec
>>> remains a local var using registers, avoiding the need to write and
>>> read stack.
>>>
>>> The improvement is significant on powerpc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>>
>> Good idea, I can see how this ends up being an improvement
>> for most of the callers.
>>
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-3-dima@arista.com
> 
> On the way to be applied.
> 

Oh nice, I get even better result with the way it is done by Dmitry 
compared to my own first patch.

On an mpc8xx at 132Mhz (32bits powerpc), before the patch I have
gettimeofday:    vdso: 1256 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-raw:    vdso: 1449 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-coarse:    vdso: 768 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic:    vdso: 1390 nsec/call

With the patch I have:
gettimeofday:    vdso: 947 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-raw:    vdso: 1156 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-coarse:    vdso: 638 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic:    vdso: 1094 nsec/call

So that's a 20-25% improvement.

I modified it slightly as follows:

diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
index 9e474d54814f..b793f211bca8 100644
--- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
+++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ u64 vdso_calc_delta(u64 cycles, u64 last, u64 mask, 
u32 mult)
  }
  #endif

-static int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clk,
-		   struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
+static __always_inline int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
+				   struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
  {
  	const struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts = &vd->basetime[clk];
  	u64 cycles, last, sec, ns;
@@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ static int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
  	return 0;
  }

-static void do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clk,
-		      struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
+static __always_inline int do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
+				     struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
  {
  	const struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts = &vd->basetime[clk];
  	u32 seq;
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ static void do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
  		ts->tv_sec = vdso_ts->sec;
  		ts->tv_nsec = vdso_ts->nsec;
  	} while (unlikely(vdso_read_retry(vd, seq)));
+
+	return 0;
  }

  static __maybe_unused int
@@ -95,15 +97,16 @@ __cvdso_clock_gettime_common(const struct vdso_data 
*vd, clockid_t clock,
  	 * clocks are handled in the VDSO directly.
  	 */
  	msk = 1U << clock;
-	if (likely(msk & VDSO_HRES)) {
-		return do_hres(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
-	} else if (msk & VDSO_COARSE) {
-		do_coarse(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
-		return 0;
-	} else if (msk & VDSO_RAW) {
-		return do_hres(&vd[CS_RAW], clock, ts);
-	}
-	return -1;
+	if (likely(msk & VDSO_HRES))
+		vd += CS_HRES_COARSE;
+	else if (msk & VDSO_COARSE)
+		return do_coarse(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
+	else if (msk & VDSO_RAW)
+		vd += CS_RAW;
+	else
+		return -1;
+
+	return do_hres(vd, clock, ts);
  }

  static __maybe_unused int

---

Christophe

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] lib: vdso: inline do_hres()
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:06:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cdb8a09-b1b6-c0a4-8b30-da095a9a660c@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8vbrpej.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>



On 01/10/2020 09:07 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christophe Leroy
>> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> do_hres() is called from several places, so GCC doesn't inline
>>> it at first.
>>>
>>> do_hres() takes a struct __kernel_timespec * parameter for
>>> passing the result. In the 32 bits case, this parameter corresponds
>>> to a local var in the caller. In order to provide a pointer
>>> to this structure, the caller has to put it in its stack and
>>> do_hres() has to write the result in the stack. This is suboptimal,
>>> especially on RISC processor like powerpc.
>>>
>>> By making GCC inline the function, the struct __kernel_timespec
>>> remains a local var using registers, avoiding the need to write and
>>> read stack.
>>>
>>> The improvement is significant on powerpc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>>
>> Good idea, I can see how this ends up being an improvement
>> for most of the callers.
>>
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-3-dima@arista.com
> 
> On the way to be applied.
> 

Oh nice, I get even better result with the way it is done by Dmitry 
compared to my own first patch.

On an mpc8xx at 132Mhz (32bits powerpc), before the patch I have
gettimeofday:    vdso: 1256 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-raw:    vdso: 1449 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-coarse:    vdso: 768 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic:    vdso: 1390 nsec/call

With the patch I have:
gettimeofday:    vdso: 947 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-raw:    vdso: 1156 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic-coarse:    vdso: 638 nsec/call
clock-gettime-monotonic:    vdso: 1094 nsec/call

So that's a 20-25% improvement.

I modified it slightly as follows:

diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
index 9e474d54814f..b793f211bca8 100644
--- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
+++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ u64 vdso_calc_delta(u64 cycles, u64 last, u64 mask, 
u32 mult)
  }
  #endif

-static int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clk,
-		   struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
+static __always_inline int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
+				   struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
  {
  	const struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts = &vd->basetime[clk];
  	u64 cycles, last, sec, ns;
@@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ static int do_hres(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
  	return 0;
  }

-static void do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, clockid_t clk,
-		      struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
+static __always_inline int do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
+				     struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
  {
  	const struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts = &vd->basetime[clk];
  	u32 seq;
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ static void do_coarse(const struct vdso_data *vd, 
clockid_t clk,
  		ts->tv_sec = vdso_ts->sec;
  		ts->tv_nsec = vdso_ts->nsec;
  	} while (unlikely(vdso_read_retry(vd, seq)));
+
+	return 0;
  }

  static __maybe_unused int
@@ -95,15 +97,16 @@ __cvdso_clock_gettime_common(const struct vdso_data 
*vd, clockid_t clock,
  	 * clocks are handled in the VDSO directly.
  	 */
  	msk = 1U << clock;
-	if (likely(msk & VDSO_HRES)) {
-		return do_hres(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
-	} else if (msk & VDSO_COARSE) {
-		do_coarse(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
-		return 0;
-	} else if (msk & VDSO_RAW) {
-		return do_hres(&vd[CS_RAW], clock, ts);
-	}
-	return -1;
+	if (likely(msk & VDSO_HRES))
+		vd += CS_HRES_COARSE;
+	else if (msk & VDSO_COARSE)
+		return do_coarse(&vd[CS_HRES_COARSE], clock, ts);
+	else if (msk & VDSO_RAW)
+		vd += CS_RAW;
+	else
+		return -1;
+
+	return do_hres(vd, clock, ts);
  }

  static __maybe_unused int

---

Christophe

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-11  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-23 14:31 [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] powerpc/32: switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] lib: vdso: ensure all arches have 32bit fallback Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:07   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:07     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:07     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 20:56     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 20:56       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 20:56       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:02       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 21:02         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 21:02         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-25  2:05   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-25  6:01   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-30 12:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:27     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:27     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-02 11:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-02 11:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-02 11:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-09 15:43       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-09 15:43         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-09 15:43         ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] lib: vdso: move call to fallback out of common code Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:24   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:24     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:24     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:41     ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:41       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:41       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:09       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:09         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:09         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-25  2:19   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] lib: vdso: Change __cvdso_clock_gettime/getres_common() to __cvdso_clock_gettime/getres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] lib: vdso: get pointer to vdso data from the arch Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:27   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:27     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:27     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:53     ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:53       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:53       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:15       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:15         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:15         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:41         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:41           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:41           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 14:46         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-12-24 14:46           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-12-24 14:46           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] lib: vdso: inline do_hres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  2:29   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:29     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  2:29     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-30 12:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-30 12:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 21:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:07       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:07       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11  9:06       ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-01-11  9:06         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11  9:06         ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] lib: vdso: make do_coarse() return 0 Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] lib: vdso: don't use READ_ONCE() in __c_kernel_time() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  1:58   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:58     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:58     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:12     ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:12       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 11:12       ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:04       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:04         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:04         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 21:12   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11  8:05     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11  8:05       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11  8:05       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11 11:07       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11 11:07         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11 11:07         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-13  6:52         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-13  6:52           ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-13  6:52           ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] lib: vdso: Avoid duplication in __cvdso_clock_getres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24  1:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:59     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24  1:59     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] powerpc/vdso32: inline __get_datapage() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] powerpc/32: Switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-25  6:54   ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-09 17:52 ` Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin() Christophe Leroy
2020-01-09 20:07   ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-09 20:07     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-09 20:07     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-10  6:45     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-10  6:45       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-10  6:45       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11 11:33       ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-11 11:33         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-11 11:33         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-16 18:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-16 18:10           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-16 18:10           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19  8:45           ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-19  8:45             ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-19  8:45             ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-19  9:52             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19  9:52               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19  9:52               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19 13:08               ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-19 13:08                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-19 13:08                 ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8cdb8a09-b1b6-c0a4-8b30-da095a9a660c@c-s.fr \
    --to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.