From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com (mail-wr1-f66.google.com [209.85.221.66]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2710F6010D for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id t18so17243253wrx.2 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 04:34:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0FpqvZjECH5vO2vXvuv36MvmueI2fzY2fI++8aAyljo=; b=fSZXfJ5ZwgYFsWAec5PW4wSaT6G4whhP6Ob667jfncoTe9aQqyqqnojAfkQqOIeZ8y RJ6rXQTnFz8T0oo6DAhTuj2DlrhI45DVyEhiJ5qRanYDD4FuThfXDSzDF6b+EoaPaP4t vcRCzPxRKZ9gw7cgSyrL/ehepJHkrLksYAcpI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0FpqvZjECH5vO2vXvuv36MvmueI2fzY2fI++8aAyljo=; b=Kact/QrJoHYGZSxkNSAbpuP98FLfZ2Op37jE1efRhBVnX2Av1hm/HqLfKjxmmUK5EV PGhd+hUbdE4d/de7xZIw1bJm4jhWqSVsQjt7ynEHz8fv+AZWl9nB2LcZF/Qh7t0mPs77 GQ+jwv7ucOLyojv9TX9UY5TxH110FpRBEJacW2LFND5qrLxfFKh2+HwxxoVmeVfnq1ga wykdz/VMSukfi27P1wZnZke93T60guuwnnR0sZpFSC4hfcRpD6p9mrDiyUtZ/7jgRuCm BQllwsn5f8nQfm/moOwOZ1UY5Cz8QswmU7gzxkef3L9XrNot7YEqE+TdNR3MmUb9qnXC xRzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXV15LU+Ip7c4PKrjsBl5SCLZsutl+1ZbxyoHrO4OngTVJt4UFJ spMd08lyks8RsscIo5p5amDkkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy9wOQiD0cDaQJlJnyuv/EjHluS9FITZrvF7AxsMgLhGoLH+6/3ZmZzXYm7VfnKYZpXKUGCJg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd46:: with SMTP id h6mr6600412wrs.170.1551962041697; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 04:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o30sm5736556wro.57.2019.03.07.04.33.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Mar 2019 04:34:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d5794a8bfe5ac118a77efbdb4b8f712d53116c6.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Zhixiong Chi , "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 12:33:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20190307065138.54589-1-zhixiong.chi@windriver.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.31.90-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] core-image-minimal-initramfs: add libgcc into the initramfs image X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 12:34:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 18:00 +0800, Zhixiong Chi wrote: > It's not for dependency of the package in the initramfs image, > > just for the multithread application while the customer use initramfs > image. > > Since we use PACKAGE_INSTALL to override the rootfs in the initramfs > bb > file, > > so we couldn't use the IMAGE_INSTALL_append to add the package in > the > local.conf. > > Did you think if it should be added into the image? :-) > > I know the initramfs is just to bootup the system. If the customer > want to support the multithread app, they can use the other types of > the image. The customer needs to depend on libgcc in their app, or their initramfs, we're not adding random dependencies to the initramfs "just in case". Cheers, Richard