From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
phil@philpotter.co.uk, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: r8188eu: refactor rtw_ch2freq()
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 23:54:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d5cf235-27f0-9c7a-3659-d2b1fe7a02dd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32a2b74b-f541-ddf6-d8c9-6bd6ca0ad07b@gmail.com>
Hi Michael,
On 2/21/22 22:20, Michael Straube wrote:
>> I'm glad that Pavel noticed this change. This is a risky thing and
>> should have been noted in the commit message.
>>
>> Just from a review stand point it would be best to leave the original
>> behavior.
>>
>
> Do you mean to leave the whole original code including the 5 GHz
> frequencies? Or returning a default value if we have a channel value < 1
> or > 14?
>
IMO, your version is much cleaner than previous one. This table walk
seems really unreasonable, since 5 GHz support is really redundant (I
saw it in other thread)
I'd put just sanity check and return the default value from previous
version. Maybe even wrapped with unlikely() if we sure, that in normal
state we won't hit it ;)
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-20 15:48 [PATCH 0/3] staging: r8188eu: clean up rtw_rf.c Michael Straube
2022-02-20 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: r8188eu: remove 5 GHz channels from ch_freq_map Michael Straube
2022-02-21 17:13 ` Greg KH
2022-02-21 19:07 ` Michael Straube
2022-02-21 19:41 ` Larry Finger
2022-02-25 8:57 ` Greg KH
2022-02-20 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: r8188eu: refactor rtw_ch2freq() Michael Straube
2022-02-20 16:20 ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-02-20 16:30 ` Michael Straube
2022-02-21 12:22 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-21 19:20 ` Michael Straube
2022-02-21 20:54 ` Pavel Skripkin [this message]
2022-02-22 5:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-22 5:34 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-20 15:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: r8188eu: clean up rtw_rf.c Michael Straube
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d5cf235-27f0-9c7a-3659-d2b1fe7a02dd@gmail.com \
--to=paskripkin@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.