Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390: Kconfig: Fix indentation and add comments

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com>,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juerg Haefliger <juergh@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390: Kconfig: Fix indentation and add comments
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 10:15:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d86b87edc9c9fa33b6a18fac8b160ee56e6a07c.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520115708.147841-2-juergh@canonical.com>

On Fri, 2022-05-20 at 13:57 +0200, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> The convention for indentation seems to be a single tab. Help text is
> further indented by an additional two whitespaces. Fix the lines that
> violate these rules.
> 
> While add it, add trailing comments to endmenu statements for better
> readability.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
[]
> @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ config RANDOMIZE_BASE
>  	  as a security feature that deters exploit attempts relying on
>  	  knowledge of the location of kernel internals.
>  
> -endmenu
> +endmenu # "Processor type and features"

An endmenu comment is relatively unusual.

$ git grep '^endmenu' -- '*/Kconfig*' | wc -l
394
$ git grep '^endmenu.*#' -- '*/Kconfig*' | wc -l
20

I believe it doesn't really help readability.