Re: [PATCH] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Fix missing setting address

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 27/04/2022 12:26, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> CC sergey's new address
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:57 AM Zhengxun <zhengxunli.mxic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In the RPC manual mode, if the data direction is not set
>>> (such as the flash erase command), the address misses the
>>> setting.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengxun <zhengxunli.mxic@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c b/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
>>> index 45eed659b0c6..9dd27c6307f7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
>>> @@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ int rpcif_manual_xfer(struct rpcif *rpc)
>>>                 }
>>>                 break;
>>>         default:
>>> +               regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMADR, rpc->smadr);
>>>                 regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMENR, rpc->enable);
>>>                 regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPCIF_SMCR,
>>>                              rpc->smcr | RPCIF_SMCR_SPIE);
> 
> This patch never received review comments.
> As of commit fff53a551db50f5e ("memory: renesas-rpc-if: Correct QSPI
> data transfer in Manual mode") in v5.16-rc1, RPCIF_SMADR is written
> before the switch() statement, hence this patch can be ignored.

Thanks Geert. The patch was not sent to proper folks and mailing lists
(only linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org seams reasonable) so there is
little way it would be ever reviewed.

Zhengxun,
Please use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the list of people and lists
to CC/address.


Best regards,
Krzysztof