From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6270FA373D for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 07:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234799AbiJ0Hw5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:52:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55118 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233974AbiJ0Hwx (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:52:53 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6450AC09A4 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 959BF66028B1; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 08:52:49 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1666857170; bh=2ckvdLsZ8CotfrVFln8EXVlUdBz1dfcyRH8Dif/TH+0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=oYfBE5VlCAbNeG49FfqtEoqVJ/EPBcfsNFVyUtSE1McxVfgN2l5iel173ERd0TOTC GB+/79+Q1UJ9jb5EOAHEWcp8ok/Pp/NOxxLtkVNJ2frHhOA2U4L2GKGar57VRLsnwi 8VrR+iXOiyBfsT7ak9dQpfcftvzGiibLAWo5/ex7hL4XcSQLzkDw1DXHE1Ju4SLkko dVhkKCp2osgH14MRsJEN+vGlz29pMF/X+pjC5RjRRr6kB0FgDQzd/0HI/U3QaEHVel JfduYRQiGkkSo6P0JJKNXwWII5P3eYOkfLmUp3d/D0HGxDWZrfcAagXEC85R7CJDlw +acdQwINniOPw== Message-ID: <8e727fd0-cfa6-1b1f-e000-bd3ccd9e34d8@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:52:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: it6505: Fix return value check for pm_runtime_get_sync To: Pin-yen Lin , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20221027032149.2739912-1-treapking@chromium.org> Content-Language: en-US From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20221027032149.2739912-1-treapking@chromium.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 27/10/22 05:21, Pin-yen Lin ha scritto: > `pm_runtime_get_sync` may return 1 on success. Fix the `if` statement > here to make the code less confusing, even though additional calls to > `it6505_poweron` doesn't break anything when it's already powered. > > This was reported by Dan Carpenter in > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1fMCs6VnxbDcB41@kili/ > > Fixes: 10517777d302 ("drm/bridge: it6505: Adapt runtime power management framework") > Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno