From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:39274 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbeCPQUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:20:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 024/110] btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , dsterba@suse.cz, Christoph Biedl , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Liu Bo , David Sterba References: <20180307191039.748351103@linuxfoundation.org> <20180307191042.810088712@linuxfoundation.org> <1521139304@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <20180316123049.GC25079@kroah.com> <20180316132202.GB8297@twin.jikos.cz> <20180316140256.GA9735@kroah.com> From: Anand Jain Message-ID: <8ebec52c-0953-aa6c-3e77-876097aaa353@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 00:21:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180316140256.GA9735@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/16/2018 10:02 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:22:02PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:30:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 07:55:42PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: >>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote... >>>> >>>>> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >>>> >>>>> commit 3c181c12c431fe33b669410d663beb9cceefcd1b upstream. >>>> (...) >>>> >>>>> If the filesystem is always used on a same endian host, this will not >>>>> be a problem. >>>> >>>> >From my observations I cannot quite subscribe to that. >>>> >>>> On big-endian systems, this change intruduces severe corruption, >>>> resulting in complete loss of the data on the used block device. >>>> >>>> Steps to reproduce (tested on ppc/powerpc and parisc/hppa): >>>> >>>> # mkfs.btrfs $DEV >>>> # mount $DEV /mnt/tmp/ >>>> # umount /mnt/tmp/ >>>> >>>> This simple umount corrupts the file system: >>>> >>>> # mount $DEV /mnt/tmp/ >>>> mount: /mnt/tmp: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on $DEV, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. >>>> >>>> # dmesg: >>>> BTRFS critical (device ): unable to find logical 4294967296 length 4096 >>>> BTRFS critical (device ): unable to find logical 4294967296 length 4096 >>>> BTRFS critical (device ): unable to find logical 18102363734671360 length 16384 >>>> BTRFS error (device ): failed to read chunk root >>>> BTRFS error (device ): open_ctree failed >>>> >>>> Also fsck is of no help: >>>> >>>> # btrfsck $DEV >>>> Couldn't map the block 18102363734671360 >>>> No mapping for 18102363734671360-18102363734687744 >>>> Couldn't map the block 18102363734671360 >>>> bytenr mismatch, want=18102363734671360, have=0 >>>> ERROR: cannot read chunk root >>>> ERROR: cannot open file system >>>> >>>> >>>> Trying mount or fsck on a little-endian system does not help either. So >>>> I consider the data on that device lost - luckily I use btrfs only for >>>> files where a backup exists all the time. >>>> >>>> >>>> Reverting that change restored the previous error-free behaviour. I >>>> didn't check HEAD, i.e. v4.16-rc5, since the upstream commt was the last >>>> that affected these files. Still I could give this a try if anybody >>>> wishes so. >>> >>> That sucks. Can you test Linus's tree to verify the problem is there? >>> I'll gladly revert this if Linus's tree also gets the revert, I don't >>> want you to hit this when you upgrade to a newer kernel. >> >> I'll push a fix for the upcoming rc but I think it would be better to >> remove the broken patch from stable kernels ASAP, so I'd recommend to >> revert it now. > > Now reverted, thanks. Thanks ! Sorry for the mess. -Anand > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >