From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6E8C433E0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24BA207D0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:03:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D24BA207D0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=weilnetz.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37914 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l491h-00045j-J7 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:03:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l490G-0003cc-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:02:28 -0500 Received: from mail.weilnetz.de ([37.120.169.71]:33878 helo=mail.v2201612906741603.powersrv.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l490E-00070v-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:02:28 -0500 Received: from edv-macbook-pro.fritz.box (p5b1511bf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.21.17.191]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.v2201612906741603.powersrv.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FDAADA0E46; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:02:23 +0100 (CET) To: Richard Henderson , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= References: <20210125144530.2837481-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20210125144530.2837481-5-philmd@redhat.com> <20210125164746.GE3538803@redhat.com> <992cbe66-dfae-7950-0d92-516b2f0c9717@redhat.com> <9f22d4b0-34ca-6798-3661-36057609c152@weilnetz.de> <30cc0c14-fbec-bb21-2b6b-8e295029bc1f@linaro.org> From: Stefan Weil Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] meson: Warn when TCI is selected but TCG backend is available Message-ID: <8f1f2dc6-5ad2-7d48-c2f9-9afa1e4d4065@weilnetz.de> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:02:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <30cc0c14-fbec-bb21-2b6b-8e295029bc1f@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.120.169.71; envelope-from=sw@weilnetz.de; helo=mail.v2201612906741603.powersrv.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 25.01.21 um 20:02 schrieb Richard Henderson: > On 1/25/21 8:58 AM, Stefan Weil wrote: >> I have no evidence that TCI is less reliable than TCG, so I would not = write that. > It can't pass make check-tcg. Where does it fail? Maybe an expected timeout problem which can be=20 solved by increasing the timeouts for TCI? I have just run a local test of `make check-tcg` with native TCG and=20 with TCI and did not see a difference. But I noticed that in both cases=20 many tests show "skipped". Stefan