From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Ceresoli Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:06:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Future of linphone package, was: Re: [PATCH/next 2/4] DEVELOPERS: add initial list of Buildroot developers In-Reply-To: <87tweahar8.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <1471902678-18693-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1471902678-18693-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <670f6e5c-e513-6b3f-ed82-4da1ddc3d141@lucaceresoli.net> <20160823134138.6f9818ef@free-electrons.com> <20160823215041.358d2e66@free-electrons.com> <87h9abjjeq.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <408dea4c-03d3-9f30-9235-5ebcc721f58b@mind.be> <87tweahar8.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <8f200388-2ebd-b0e9-6df1-d0891d597e7e@lucaceresoli.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, All, On 24/08/2016 09:44, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle writes: > > Hi, > > >> > What do you think? > >> > >> If nobody cares about it, yes - Then I think we should deprecate it. > > > I say, leave it alone unless there are some annoying autobuild failures. There > > are hundreds of packages that nobody cares about, are we going to deprecate them > > all? > > Yeah, as long as it is not causing issues I'm fine with keeping it. Apparently nobody is interested in keeping this package up to date. Still it's not causing relevant build issues so at the moment, so I agree with Arnout: let's keep it where it is. Thomas, you can keep linphone under my name in the DEVELOPERS file, and I will look at build failures. If the effort to fix them will be too high I'll suggest to deprecate it. -- Luca