From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Clear scanline waits after disabling the pipe. Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <8u3s94$g6qrom@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> References: <1281519096-5152-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <1281519096-5152-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <20100811082323.0ada8b9b@virtuousgeek.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB609E7B1 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:13:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100811082323.0ada8b9b@virtuousgeek.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:23:23 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Have we confirmed that this one actually works? That's what testers are for ;-). > It seems safe enough, > though Eric's comment about idling things first still applies, right? Yes, this merely attempts to hide the fact that we are doing the wrong thing, not to actually correct our behaviour. -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre