From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/32] video/msm_fb: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueues Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:14:11 -0800 Message-ID: <8ya7hdsg5j0.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110103170615.GB2285@redhat.com> <1294078245.18295.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20110125134558.GY27510@htj.dyndns.org> <1295978420.25496.18.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:14664 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752051Ab1AYTOM (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:14:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1295978420.25496.18.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (Daniel Walker's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:00:20 -0800") Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Walker Cc: Tejun Heo , Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Huntsman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:45 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: >> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:06 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >> > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: >> > > > With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues. Drop >> > > > msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo >> > > > Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka >> > > I'm not the right person, CC according to MAINTAINERS >> > >> > ARM/QUALCOMM MSM MACHINE SUPPORT >> > M: David Brown >> > M: Daniel Walker >> > M: Bryan Huntsman >> >> Oops, sorry about that. So how does the patch look? Are you gonna >> take it through msm tree or shall I take it? > > David ? > > Daniel Is it difficult for you to test this change, Daniel? I can pull it in once we verify it still works. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.