From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, PDS_BAD_THREAD_QP_64,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D89C433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A81B613D6 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233556AbhEUOKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 10:10:05 -0400 Received: from mx01-sz.bfs.de ([194.94.69.67]:9768 "EHLO mx01-sz.bfs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232170AbhEUOKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 10:10:05 -0400 Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (exchange-sz.bfs.de [10.129.90.31]) by mx01-sz.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23F2A20655; Fri, 21 May 2021 16:08:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bfs.de; s=dkim201901; t=1621606121; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m0KBNvFtJO6NXDKZV6z6PKytEDf0WPO9H0CTy0gHsD4=; b=kYCN3fZLoUN2W46uyqxT10Fc/RzDHnAM0wTc+KOSXwdJgsM0prDS7Gp2jSnwnCpesC0rej BML7yimzFUscf0ANaFInjW/6ZbBO9s0e/bkbJdiAUZb3UJFK1NyZ9kDktw7SWFocaYbRK3 JhDdhPN9BwOol5bN3hfARg5alrUCmrrfsg4d2OP1/R0YnRYnl1mECoieODlQXZ/iuEOeUg hA2aF4+QEl2KkM2IPf4q7+e30mtQa/ImmLm9ZWvFMOYymiKcRENzgPR8ozgh0ZhwnS8d1r WEmvVHL+OcAZxEInKiqhI2Dm2RThOlID+Ep1aIWTQWjeyEK3iM6x4GvkHeP4mg== Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (10.129.90.31) by SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (10.129.90.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2242.4; Fri, 21 May 2021 16:08:40 +0200 Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern ([fe80::7d2d:f9cb:2761:d24a]) by SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern ([fe80::7d2d:f9cb:2761:d24a%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.008; Fri, 21 May 2021 16:08:40 +0200 From: Walter Harms To: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" CC: "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: AW: AW: Re: Thread-Topic: AW: Re: Thread-Index: AQHXTPMWVIcs2d4EfEKcaQoC4sfWeqrtpqiAgAA6BXz//+6JAIAAJiPX Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:08:40 +0000 Message-ID: <904f79501b114346a3e7bd84efb13a6a@bfs.de> References: <60a57e3a.lbqA81rLGmtH2qoy%Radisson97@gmx.de> <6d2849cd-d8af-0539-e579-3201daed6ab1@gmail.com> <9baa6f3ac0dd45b4b75a11044dd0f0ed@bfs.de>,<763071ea-e70d-ef89-8455-da7662e67518@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <763071ea-e70d-ef89-8455-da7662e67518@gmail.com> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.137.16.40] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-14.0.0.3080-8.6.1012-26172.000 x-tm-as-result: No-10--3.218200-5.000000 x-tmase-matchedrid: 1S6u5QTQd1vRubRCcrbc5grcxrzwsv5u3dCmvEa6IiGoLZarzrrPmUYj NK+Q6GZAMYarc+woSczVeptTRKjYpdSefNlpHYemF3wQ0cu1bTMzTATDGmcD/j+B/tp8itBTpai fMRbHH7mrLIIv7em00K5svhqHJ8Su+TcmArI4kFrc+EHoN3gzlyBP+xe0Zet/Y4zJvUjGrxWLa/ 0H8DRDQZ0Ag7ACu4P/dqQQIhr5j4vfkJeYYItMRTkWEAXjjR2RnnjOyk87HN98YCCIGSc4tfFnz pYjk62hAfQ5bTA9gjWPWx38Q1qIm/iaJZQRpNA+194/5X9VfCwiJN3aXuV/oVEPmF4mfG4ru+Ub Xqs0HDcDCvV3UwP6eNRkgfXwQXSR7GX0c1UlalyVjmqvt/p8cjXN9+/4/e70lwV2iaAfSWeDGx/ OQ1GV8t0H8LFZNFG7doMssNsUwYX2pH88br2lQAWphomgN7PjVLyDG+34W+5xqRKs5yxY0FYSqY XZTfrLEGaWAtDHqNsFIeOmxHSEY8j8Qji4Huh5jyEn4YaUvO/e4R8pXaDytwntx4SzZN2w0zUHR QIpp96lf7LKrFw+x9Tq6WfhLX2j x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No x-tmase-result: 10--3.218200-5.000000 x-tmase-version: SMEX-14.0.0.3080-8.6.1012-26172.000 x-tm-snts-smtp: E9E00CCC6579601C64DAA9DF18BF4668AE3610475AEAC8DFD6D977157E6A13E22000:9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: mx01-sz.bfs.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-15.00 / 7.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.00)[21.24%]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[bfs.de:s=dkim201901]; WHITELIST_LOCAL_IP(-15.00)[10.129.90.31]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[vger.kernel.org,gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org (before we misunderstand each other i do not insists on that patch) The function is available and that should be documented. They seem available for some time, but glibc says: These functions=20 exist for compatibility reasons. What is about a merger with lgamma() ? adding to the notes section something like that: glibc version Glibc has a gamma() function (and _r) that is equivalent to=20 lgamma(3) and computes the natural logarithm of the Gamma function. That function is deprecated and should not be used in newer programs= .=20 re, wh ________________________________________ Von: Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Mai 2021 15:29 An: Walter Harms Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org; Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) Betreff: Re: AW: Re: WARNUNG: Diese E-Mail kam von au=DFerhalb der Organisation. Klicken Sie nic= ht auf Links oder =F6ffnen Sie keine Anh=E4nge, es sei denn, Sie kennen den= /die Absender*in und wissen, dass der Inhalt sicher ist. Hi Walter, On 5/21/21 3:11 PM, Walter Harms wrote: > I will not argue that the function is deprecated. > > NTL i added the gamma_r function that are missing > and changed the wording for the description. I think > it is better than in lgamma especially for signgam. > I noticed that it should be more obvious. > > re, > wh I never used these functions, so I don know for sure. Isn't gamma_r(3) just an (obsolete) alias for lgamma_r(3)? If so, lgamma_r(3) is already documented, and the gamma(3) manual page already points to it. I don't see why gamma_r(3), which is obsolete, should be documented. Thanks, Alex -- Alejandro Colomar Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/