From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sricharan R Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] qcom: mtd: nand: allocate bam transaction Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:52:03 +0530 Message-ID: <906da0d9-2ef7-583a-4008-4f444eaa340b@codeaurora.org> References: <1498720566-20782-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> <1498720566-20782-6-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:34042 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752564AbdGCIWO (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 04:22:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1498720566-20782-6-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Abhishek Sahu , dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com, richard@nod.at, cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, architt@codeaurora.org Hi Abhishek, <..> > +/* Allocates and Initializes the BAM transaction */ > +static struct bam_transaction * > +alloc_bam_transaction(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, unsigned int num_cw) > +{ > + struct bam_transaction *bam_txn; > + > + bam_txn = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn), GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (!bam_txn) > + return NULL; > + > + bam_txn->bam_ce = > + devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->bam_ce) * > + num_cw * QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_CMD_ELEMENTS, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!bam_txn->bam_ce) > + return NULL; > + > + bam_txn->cmd_sgl = > + devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->cmd_sgl) * num_cw * > + QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_CMD_SGL, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!bam_txn->cmd_sgl) > + return NULL; > + > + bam_txn->data_sg = > + devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->data_sg) * > + num_cw * QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_DATA_SGL, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!bam_txn->data_sg) > + return NULL; > + > + nandc->max_cwperpage = num_cw; > + > + return bam_txn; > +} > + > static inline struct qcom_nand_host *to_qcom_nand_host(struct nand_chip *chip) > { > return container_of(chip, struct qcom_nand_host, chip); > @@ -1868,6 +1958,8 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host) > mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &qcom_nand_ooblayout_ops); > > cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size; > + nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage, > + cwperpage); > > /* > * DATA_UD_BYTES varies based on whether the read/write command protects > @@ -2010,6 +2102,19 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc) > dev_err(nandc->dev, "failed to request cmd channel\n"); > return -ENODEV; > } > + > + /* > + * Initially allocate BAM transaction to read ONFI param page. > + * After detecting all the devices, this BAM transaction will > + * be freed and the next BAM tranasction will be allocated with > + * maximum codeword size > + */ > + nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc, 1); > + if (!nandc->bam_txn) { > + dev_err(nandc->dev, > + "failed to allocate bam transaction\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > } > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nandc->desc_list); > @@ -2153,6 +2258,17 @@ static int qcom_probe_nand_devices(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc) > if (list_empty(&nandc->host_list)) > return -ENODEV; > > + if (nandc->dma_bam_enabled) { > + free_bam_transaction(nandc); > + nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc, > + nandc->max_cwperpage); Somehow, looks like something is missing because, nandc->max_cwperpage passed from here is used in alloc_bam_transaction, but it is assigned in the same function ? Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus