From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 07:56:55 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] This patch set represent Marvell mvpp2 driver fixes In-Reply-To: References: <1498033898-15650-1-git-send-email-stefanc@malvell.com> <06d7bf5a-2c63-824c-126a-1754cfc2f0d6@denx.de> <4c1eaf4a-cfd7-4cf0-8a92-6a5958731cf0@denx.de> Message-ID: <90703c73-8f63-25bb-1de5-c8886825f807@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Joe, On 08.08.2017 17:57, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Stefan (and Stefan), > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: >> Hi Joe, >> >> On 11.07.2017 10:04, Stefan Roese wrote: >>> >>> On 21.06.2017 10:31, stefanc at malvell.com wrote: > > Huh? Sent from a typo email address? Where is the problem with the Stefan Chulski's email address? Sorry, I can't spot it. > That's pretty tedious. I > recommend fixing your git config. And if that's fine, I recommend > using patman so this won't happen again. > >>>> >>>> From: Stefan Chulski >>>> >>>> Issues were found during internal QA phase. >>>> >>>> Stefan Chulski (10): >>>> net: mvpp2x: Add GPIO configuration support >>>> net: mvpp2x: fix phy connected to wrong mdio issue >>>> net: mvpp2x: Enable GoP packet padding in TX >>>> net: mvpp2x: fix BM configuration overrun issue >>>> net: mvpp2x: decrease size of AGGR_TXQ and CPU_DESC_CHUNK >>>> net: mvpp2x: remove MBUS configurations from MvPP22 driver >>>> net: mvpp2x: Remove IRQ configuration from u-boot >>>> net: mvpp2x: Set BM pool high address >>>> net: mvpp2x: remove TX drain from transmit routine >>>> net: mvpp2x: Set BM poll size once during priv probe >>>> >>>> drivers/net/mvpp2.c | 189 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) >>> >>> >>> Joe, do you have any comments on these mvpp2 patches? >> >> >> Gently ping on these patches again. Joe, do you have any comments >> on these? Do you want to take these patches via your tree? Or >> should I push them if you don't have any objections? > > Reviewing now. I generally use patchwork to remember what I have to > do. I guess if I didn't rely on that I would set up better work queue > email filters. Sorry for the delay. > > I figured since the series is assigned to you in PW, that you wanted > it through your tree. I'm fine either way. I assume that Tom assigned them to me (I didn't do it at least). But I can definitely pull these patches via the Marvell tree, once all open issues are resolved and all patches have your Acked-by tag. Thanks for the review! Thanks, Stefan