From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Petersson, Mats" Subject: RE: hvm_init_ap_contexts Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:49:41 +0100 Message-ID: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E1A00@sefsexmb1.amd.com> References: <45E70280.8090208@cea.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message In-Reply-To: <45E70280.8090208@cea.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: PUCCETTI Armand , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com=20 > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of=20 > PUCCETTI Armand > Sent: 01 March 2007 16:43 > To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > Subject: [Xen-devel] hvm_init_ap_contexts >=20 > Why is there an argument returned in the function below (of hvm.h),=20 > knowing that there is void? >=20 > static inline void > hvm_init_ap_context(struct vcpu_guest_context *ctxt, > int vcpuid, int trampoline_vector) > { > return hvm_funcs.init_ap_context(ctxt, vcpuid, trampoline_vector); > } Seems broken (or rather "unnecessar and confusing" to me - fancy submitting a fix? >>From what I can tell, this has been "broken" for quite some time, and as of about 2000 changesets, the return-type of that function hasn't changed.=20 -- Mats >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >=20 >=20 >=20