From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] ethdev: Support VFs on the
	different PCI domains
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:19:29 +0100
Message-ID: <90a90355-4f83-1def-081b-070924dd60d0@intel.com>
References: <1472230448-17490-1-git-send-email-krytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1475237154-25388-1-git-send-email-krytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1475237154-25388-15-git-send-email-krytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com, zyta.szpak@semihalf.com,
 slawomir.rosek@semihalf.com, rad@semihalf.com,
 jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com,
 Kamil Rytarowski <kamil.rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Kamil Rytarowski <krytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773012952
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:19:33 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1475237154-25388-15-git-send-email-krytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Kamil,

On 9/30/2016 1:05 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> It's possible to have the same numbers for bus, device id and function,
> therefore we need to differentiate on domain.
> 
> This enables DPDK with multiple VFs on ThunderX 2-socket hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Czekaj <maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Rytarowski <kamil.rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zyta Szpak <zyta.szpak@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Slawomir Rosek <slawomir.rosek@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Biernacki <rad@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> index 382c959..01d5fb0 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_create_unique_device_name(char *name, size_t size,
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = snprintf(name, size, "%d:%d.%d",
> +	ret = snprintf(name, size, "%d:%d:%d.%d", pci_dev->addr.domain,
>  			pci_dev->addr.bus, pci_dev->addr.devid,
>  			pci_dev->addr.function);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> 

Is it possible to separate this patch from patchset, this is a ethdev
patch and it seems not directly related to the rest of the patchset?

Thanks,
ferruh