From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 00/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: add MSI interrupt support Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:56:26 -0700 Message-ID: <90b882fa-8a10-089a-eb2d-c7deaa611526@codeaurora.org> References: <1476899512-20431-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20161020094838.GY2467@localhost> <20161020164321.GZ2467@localhost> <37baf7db-1e14-4027-9397-70649e8fa946@codeaurora.org> <20161021065723.GA2467@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:57792 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933352AbcJUP4b (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:56:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161021065723.GA2467@localhost> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, agross@codeaurora.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 10/20/2016 11:57 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: >> It looks like patches were applied out of order. > When applying, if I get a conflict I try to skip them. Typically subsequent > patches fail, sometimes they apply. I think couple of them did in this case > > It built for me, 0day also gave me success report, so unless we have bisect > regression, I would like rest of the patches on top of this please.. > OK. Let me work on it. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:56:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V6 00/10] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: add MSI interrupt support In-Reply-To: <20161021065723.GA2467@localhost> References: <1476899512-20431-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20161020094838.GY2467@localhost> <20161020164321.GZ2467@localhost> <37baf7db-1e14-4027-9397-70649e8fa946@codeaurora.org> <20161021065723.GA2467@localhost> Message-ID: <90b882fa-8a10-089a-eb2d-c7deaa611526@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/20/2016 11:57 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: >> It looks like patches were applied out of order. > When applying, if I get a conflict I try to skip them. Typically subsequent > patches fail, sometimes they apply. I think couple of them did in this case > > It built for me, 0day also gave me success report, so unless we have bisect > regression, I would like rest of the patches on top of this please.. > OK. Let me work on it. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.