From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eads, Gage" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Add stack library and new mempool handler Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 20:49:08 +0000 Message-ID: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E542107EF@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20190401211429.20282-1-gage.eads@intel.com> <20190403200916.16349-1-gage.eads@intel.com> <4770051.yqIPWfFot0@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "arybchenko@solarflare.com" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "gavin.hu@arm.com" , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" , "nd@arm.com" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2845920 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 22:49:12 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4770051.yqIPWfFot0@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 3:40 PM > To: Eads, Gage > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.matz@6wind.com; arybchenko@solarflare.com; > Richardson, Bruce ; Ananyev, Konstantin > ; gavin.hu@arm.com; > Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com; nd@arm.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/8] Add stack library and new mempool > handler >=20 > 03/04/2019 22:09, Gage Eads: > > v7: > > - Add rte_branch_prediction.h include to rte_stack_std.h for unlikely() > > - Add rte_compat.h include to rte_stack.h for __rte_experimental >=20 > There is another error when compiling for Arm: >=20 > lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h:76:2: error: > implicit declaration of function 'RTE_ASSERT' Fix incoming. Looking through the rest of that header, I don't see any othe= r externally defined macros/data structures/functions/etc. that would need = another include. Also note that v7's ci/Performance-Testing build fail (http://mails.dpdk.or= g/archives/test-report/2019-April/079261.html) is because dpdklab applied t= he patch on commit 3c45889189924067, which is older than the 128-bit CAS pa= tch.