From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: TXEMA LOPEZ <tlopez@aotek.es>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:53:34 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] fixup section problem.
Message-ID: <918EB199DDDFFA42BEA2EB3A1C6021F301555677@CORREO>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Grant,
My intention is not to submit the patch. It could add some noise in all the U-Boot architectures without add any new functionality or improvement. Furthermore, my impression is that Wolfgang was not very interested in this patch so I gave up this work. Anyway, I can submit the patch to you out of the U-Boot-users list.

Best regards,

Txema

 -----Mensaje original-----
De: 	glikely at gmail.com [mailto:glikely at gmail.com]  En nombre de Grant Likely
Enviado el:	lunes, 12 de febrero de 2007 5:45
Para:	TXEMA LOPEZ
CC:	Wolfgang Denk; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto:	Re: [U-Boot-Users] fixup section problem.

On 11/3/06, Txema Lopez <tlopez@aotek.es> wrote:
> I think the method I suggest you using a new define It's quite
> reasonable. I'll summit the patch for the Lite5200's and the rest of
> boards will be not affected. If someone want to use or test the fixup
> relocation for his board only has to do two changes:
>             - cleanup the fixup section from the text section in  the
> u-boot.lds file.
>             - define CFG_FIXUP_RELOCATION in the board configuration file.

Txema,

How's your work on this patch coming along?  I've got the same problem
with new code that I've written for the Xilinx virtex boards.  I don't
want to do the manual relocation hack, so I'm very much looking
forward to seeing your fix.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195