From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sujit K M Subject: Re: mq_timedrecieve timeout accuracy Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:15:09 +0530 Message-ID: <921ca19c1003240645s5c69fde9l464618ec7aa644af@mail.gmail.com> References: <6d09081c1003240527r471ee34etbba11b4b7c7e92b3@mail.gmail.com> <8226231.1269436934345.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail10.arcor-online.net> <6d09081c1003240637w28ee6861tfcef4c7876ef3e40@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "M. Koehrer" , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, rachana.rao@in.abb.com To: Pradyumna Sampath Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:37261 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755331Ab0CXNpK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:45:10 -0400 Received: by pva18 with SMTP id 18so409876pva.19 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:45:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6d09081c1003240637w28ee6861tfcef4c7876ef3e40@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > time =3D schedule_timeout(timeout); =46ine. > Maybe this is why produces a timeout that is inaccurate. Shouldnt it > be schedule_hrtimeout ? Does the RT Patch change anything. OR is it the same. > > regards > /prady > > -- > http://www.prady.in > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-us= ers" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > --=20 -- Sujit K M blog(http://kmsujit.blogspot.com/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-user= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html