From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87A7C433EF for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 21:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232163AbiDIVdV (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 17:33:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231915AbiDIVdV (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 17:33:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6B7E1033; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 14:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id n9so10852724plc.4; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 14:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bXHLCa3dfzOIhVpo6ukpcQv28YFp7azGl7372EerRWE=; b=MW0T7rAGnneZdsW/GewBji04ECXWXw5jdFtHtuxEqvQokJavApef+EeyEAI1Ym45iY bpLW3vtiKZjz7KMujAB/aMDbY1J576TpiGzYbL13UfuXV7y8YFLrnBe9iWAroDlPa9KM M2OWZQiyVe5BnUulZtb7QCQ6yqX6/gNrlPLJQbmqaOghB98EeqgTRLtxFvSWSoM19GZo jlzG8sIJHaET0DAnUGpBG1gwMQGX/hUp4gRYZEerlXOetWTQW9CrZNrJwu3sWUUWCnHM Lov0x9FNO6wuCBDYidT3nD/D/aZ5uQC95h/nK6SQ7VB9nV87fjbcVMX2BzjepYufx+bi bj3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dU2RD3mSA44+Y0cuuyXwOoTehJ2pR5q868266DSKU4X1tFNTh jOHP6T3QebEjC1tD/HKGank= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiPGUKhP2E6gW5QpL4MVOIoeilAzAEraJsHe/m5MbOTFLPTdAH4Z2mmESVNoclbygW2iyhcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2284:b0:157:110f:1b27 with SMTP id b4-20020a170903228400b00157110f1b27mr13411872plh.108.1649539871960; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 14:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:647:4000:d7:feaa:14ff:fe9d:6dbd? ([2601:647:4000:d7:feaa:14ff:fe9d:6dbd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z16-20020a056a00241000b004f3a647ae89sm31503976pfh.174.2022.04.09.14.31.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Apr 2022 14:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <924169bb-4a94-e9b1-1aeb-86c99e8637e7@acm.org> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 14:31:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC v2 0/8] improve tag allocation under heavy load Content-Language: en-US To: Jens Axboe , "yukuai (C)" , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, john.garry@huawei.com, ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com References: <20220408073916.1428590-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> <98d3b9b9-1786-837c-d316-cc991305c8aa@kernel.dk> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <98d3b9b9-1786-837c-d316-cc991305c8aa@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 4/8/22 19:28, Jens Axboe wrote: > The easiest is probably to try and send patches to a gmail account. If > you don't have one, just create one. That will help you see the issue > and verify whatever the fix might be. It might be a company email > server issue, hower. Hi Jens and Yu, I think it's a company email issue. Many servers that receive email rely on the SPF, DKIM & DMARC standards to determine whether or not to classify email as spam. I had to add the following rule to my inbox receive Huawei.com emails: Matches: from:(huawei.com) Do this: Never send it to Spam Thanks, Bart.