From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Changing snd_hda_intel.power_save default value ? Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:19:44 +0100 Message-ID: <9247bda8-da84-81e0-7897-8a45008c0d10@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EB226709F for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:19:49 +0100 (CET) Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Vinod Koul , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi All, I'm working on trying to improve the OOTB power-consumption of Linux (Fedora Workstation) on laptops. One of the easy wins here is setting snd_hda_intel.power_save=1 I see that the default is configurable through a Kconfig option, currently Fedora is using the Kconfig default value of 0. So I'm wondering if there any known issues with changing the default to 1 ? I was also thinking that maybe an automatic value (SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE_DEFAULT == -1) might be a good idea, which would mean 0 normally except for PCI-ids which are markes with a MOBILE flag in their driver_data in the azx_ids pci_device_id table ? Regards, Hans