Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/hmm: hmm_range_fault() NULL pointer bug

[Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>]

On 8/26/19 11:09 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:02:12AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>>
>> On 8/24/19 3:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>>>> Although hmm_range_fault() calls find_vma() to make sure that a vma exists
>>>> before calling walk_page_range(), hmm_vma_walk_hole() can still be called
>>>> with walk->vma == NULL if the start and end address are not contained
>>>> within the vma range.
>>>
>>> Should we convert to walk_vma_range instead?  Or keep walk_page_range
>>> but drop searching the vma ourselves?
>>>
>>> Except for that the patch looks good to me:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>
>>
>> I think keeping the call to walk_page_range() makes sense.
>> Jason is hoping to be able to snapshot a range with & without vmas
>> and have the pfns[] filled with empty/valid entries as appropriate.
>>
>> I plan to repost my patch changing hmm_range_fault() to use
>> walk.test_walk which will remove the call to find_vma().
>> Jason had some concerns about testing it so that's why I have
>> been working on some HMM self tests before resending it.
> 
> I'm really excited to see tests for hmm_range_fault()!
> 
> Did you find this bug with the tests??
> 
> Jason
> 

Yes, I found both bugs with the tests.
I started with Jerome's hmm_dummy driver and user level test code.
Hopefully I can send it out this week.