[PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Josh Elsasser]

Add the two 1000BaseLX enum values to the X550's check for 1Gbps modules,
allowing the core driver code to establish a link over this SFP type.

This is done by the out-of-tree driver but the fix wasn't in mainline.

Fixes: 6a14ee0cfb19 ("ixgbe: Add X550 support function pointers")
Signed-off-by: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
index 10dbaf4f6e80..9c42f741ed5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
@@ -2262,7 +2262,9 @@ static s32 ixgbe_get_link_capabilities_X550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
 		*autoneg = false;
 
 		if (hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core0 ||
-		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core1) {
+		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core1 ||
+		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_lx_core0 ||
+		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_lx_core1) {
 			*speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_1GB_FULL;
 			return 0;
 		}
-- 
2.19.1

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Josh Elsasser]

Add the two 1000BaseLX enum values to the X550's check for 1Gbps modules,
allowing the core driver code to establish a link over this SFP type.

This is done by the out-of-tree driver but the fix wasn't in mainline.

Fixes: 6a14ee0cfb19 ("ixgbe: Add X550 support function pointers")
Signed-off-by: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
index 10dbaf4f6e80..9c42f741ed5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
@@ -2262,7 +2262,9 @@ static s32 ixgbe_get_link_capabilities_X550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
 		*autoneg = false;
 
 		if (hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core0 ||
-		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core1) {
+		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core1 ||
+		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_lx_core0 ||
+		    hw->phy.sfp_type == ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_lx_core1) {
 			*speed = IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_1GB_FULL;
 			return 0;
 		}
-- 
2.19.1

Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Bjørn Mork]

Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com> writes:

> Fixes: 6a14ee0cfb19 ("ixgbe: Add X550 support function pointers")

Not that it matters much I guess, but I think LX SFPs were unsupported
at that time. The LX support appears to have been added under the radar
while refactoring ixgbe_setup_sfp_modules_X550em in commit e23f33367882
("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+")


Bjørn

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[=?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B8rn?= Mork]

Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com> writes:

> Fixes: 6a14ee0cfb19 ("ixgbe: Add X550 support function pointers")

Not that it matters much I guess, but I think LX SFPs were unsupported
at that time. The LX support appears to have been added under the radar
while refactoring ixgbe_setup_sfp_modules_X550em in commit e23f33367882
("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+")


Bj?rn

Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Josh Elsasser]

Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:

> Not that it matters much I guess, but I think LX SFPs were unsupported
> at that time. The LX support appears to have been added under the radar
> while refactoring ixgbe_setup_sfp_modules_X550em in commit e23f33367882
> ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+")

Looks like you’re right. Want me to respin with an additional “Fixes” tag?

- Josh

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Josh Elsasser]

Bj?rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:

> Not that it matters much I guess, but I think LX SFPs were unsupported
> at that time. The LX support appears to have been added under the radar
> while refactoring ixgbe_setup_sfp_modules_X550em in commit e23f33367882
> ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+")

Looks like you?re right. Want me to respin with an additional ?Fixes? tag?

- Josh

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Bowers, AndrewX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Elsasser
> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 12:58 PM
> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Josh
> Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP
> modules as 1Gbps
> 
> Add the two 1000BaseLX enum values to the X550's check for 1Gbps
> modules, allowing the core driver code to establish a link over this SFP type.
> 
> This is done by the out-of-tree driver but the fix wasn't in mainline.
> 
> Fixes: 6a14ee0cfb19 ("ixgbe: Add X550 support function pointers")
> Signed-off-by: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Bowers, AndrewX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at osuosl.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Elsasser
> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 12:58 PM
> To: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Josh
> Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP
> modules as 1Gbps
> 
> Add the two 1000BaseLX enum values to the X550's check for 1Gbps
> modules, allowing the core driver code to establish a link over this SFP type.
> 
> This is done by the out-of-tree driver but the fix wasn't in mainline.
> 
> Fixes: 6a14ee0cfb19 ("ixgbe: Add X550 support function pointers")
> Signed-off-by: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>

Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Jeff Kirsher]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 687 bytes --]

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:54 -0800, Josh Elsasser wrote:
> Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
> 
> > Not that it matters much I guess, but I think LX SFPs were
> > unsupported
> > at that time. The LX support appears to have been added under the
> > radar
> > while refactoring ixgbe_setup_sfp_modules_X550em in commit
> > e23f33367882
> > ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+")
> 
> Looks like you’re right. Want me to respin with an additional “Fixes”
> tag?

No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
have in my tree for validation and review.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Jeff Kirsher]

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:54 -0800, Josh Elsasser wrote:
> Bj?rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
> 
> > Not that it matters much I guess, but I think LX SFPs were
> > unsupported
> > at that time. The LX support appears to have been added under the
> > radar
> > while refactoring ixgbe_setup_sfp_modules_X550em in commit
> > e23f33367882
> > ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+")
> 
> Looks like you?re right. Want me to respin with an additional ?Fixes?
> tag?

No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
have in my tree for validation and review.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20181126/96702f71/attachment-0001.asc>

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Josh Elsasser]

Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:

> No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
> tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
> have in my tree for validation and review.

Thanks, let’s try that.

Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+”)

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Josh Elsasser]

Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:

> No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
> tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
> have in my tree for validation and review.

Thanks, let?s try that.

Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+?)

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[David Miller]

From: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:54:11 -0800

> Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
>> tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
>> have in my tree for validation and review.
> 
> Thanks, let’s try that.
> 
> Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+”)

Unfortunately, patchwork isn't smart enough to pick up Fixes: tags
still.

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[David Miller]

From: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:54:11 -0800

> Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
>> tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
>> have in my tree for validation and review.
> 
> Thanks, let?s try that.
> 
> Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+?)

Unfortunately, patchwork isn't smart enough to pick up Fixes: tags
still.

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Jeff Kirsher]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 730 bytes --]

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 20:52 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:54:11 -0800
> 
> > Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional
> > > "Fixes"
> > > tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the
> > > patch I
> > > have in my tree for validation and review.
> > 
> > Thanks, let’s try that.
> > 
> > Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for
> > X550EM_x SFP+”)
> 
> Unfortunately, patchwork isn't smart enough to pick up Fixes: tags
> still.

:-( I will get it added to the patch in my tree then.  Thanks Dave for
the info.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Jeff Kirsher]

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 20:52 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:54:11 -0800
> 
> > Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional
> > > "Fixes"
> > > tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the
> > > patch I
> > > have in my tree for validation and review.
> > 
> > Thanks, let?s try that.
> > 
> > Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for
> > X550EM_x SFP+?)
> 
> Unfortunately, patchwork isn't smart enough to pick up Fixes: tags
> still.

:-( I will get it added to the patch in my tree then.  Thanks Dave for
the info.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20181127/cb866a70/attachment.asc>

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Florian Fainelli]

On 11/26/2018 8:52 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:54:11 -0800
> 
>> Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
>>> tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
>>> have in my tree for validation and review.
>>
>> Thanks, let’s try that.
>>
>> Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+”)
> 
> Unfortunately, patchwork isn't smart enough to pick up Fixes: tags
> still.
> 

This is something that can be added easily in the patchwork
administration panel, maybe ask Jeremy or Stephen to do that?
-- 
Florian

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

[Florian Fainelli]

On 11/26/2018 8:52 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@appneta.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:54:11 -0800
> 
>> Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
>>> tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
>>> have in my tree for validation and review.
>>
>> Thanks, let?s try that.
>>
>> Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+?)
> 
> Unfortunately, patchwork isn't smart enough to pick up Fixes: tags
> still.
> 

This is something that can be added easily in the patchwork
administration panel, maybe ask Jeremy or Stephen to do that?
-- 
Florian