From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7C5C3A5A4 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D5422CE3 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:01:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566666082; bh=PsVYKPeLGylvxL45W+0jiW0BvrVx3hxT1IbOp37s3uY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ctIzB9X/BOPRd2Bqq8flSv8XZg0/hqbChRgl6AxDdHPg5PcSJGtj2HGR8AN2UjQ2+ NrnUwoHqIh8x8phvuUJCFGuTZIAyr8u5njFAHXDWbzllvqAs0mukOEQfMMLirYt4LN FvwT5NlsXhfkSLk76kE66c37fG/uNZt92mqboEfM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727786AbfHXRBW (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:01:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60956 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726343AbfHXRBV (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:01:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-9-64-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.9.64.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3114B2173E; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:01:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566666080; bh=PsVYKPeLGylvxL45W+0jiW0BvrVx3hxT1IbOp37s3uY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=vnnK2pS8/apoAAIk2CKDr8RgnnrAdqSSrkzaMaTBVWHIMIiyWYhCEJPsFRhFdpG+C ST4RlLDYWvS61K84aKOXBzIBnWhauWZc8/7HzBOIPbx87UY6x41Az8D11CKj4gUezU U1PKUbubQNg1TvgRGYaK0kokrhS3e1FL9Tb1SKOg= Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/135] 5.2.10-stable review To: Greg KH Cc: Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, shuah References: <20190822170811.13303-1-sashal@kernel.org> <00216731-a088-7d47-eafb-70409f876bda@kernel.org> <20190824023829.GE9862@kroah.com> <20190824153348.GA27505@kroah.com> From: shuah Message-ID: <93850e40-7df9-b5db-bda4-5b4354d2c3f3@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 11:01:19 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190824153348.GA27505@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/24/19 9:33 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 09:21:53AM -0600, shuah wrote: >> On 8/23/19 8:38 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:41:03PM -0600, shuah wrote: >>>> On 8/22/19 11:05 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.10 release. >>>>> There are 135 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Responses should be made by Sat 24 Aug 2019 05:07:10 PM UTC. >>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.10-rc1.gz >>>> >>>> I am seeing "Sorry I can't find your kernels". Is this posted? >>> >>> Ah, Sasha didn't generate the patch but it was still listed here, oops. >>> He copied my format and we didn't notice this, sorry about that. >>> >>> As the thread shows, we didn't generate this file this time to see what >>> would happen. If your test process requires it, we can generate it as I >>> don't want to break it. >>> >> >> It will make it lot easier for me to have continued support for patch >> generation. My scripts do "wget" to pull the patch and apply. > > Ok, we will get this back and working, sorry about that. > Great. Thanks for accommodating my workflow. thanks, -- Shuah